Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
Business


More Las Vegas homes head to auction block

More than 60 bank-owned and privately owned homes valued from $200,000 to $1.5 million will be auctioned Saturday at 10 a.m. at Fiesta Henderson.

Kris McCormack, owner of Las Vegas-based RealEstateAuctionByOwner.com, said she plans to conduct foreclosure auctions monthly.


Most Popular Stories
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK: The readers have voted: These Southern Nevada companies know how to keep workers happy
  • REAL ESTATE: Homebuilders hunt for land
  • INSIDE GAMING: Sanitizing slots, cards a priority for casinos
  • Home sales, median prices rise in valley
  • TIVOLI VILLAGE: Work intensifies at mixed-use center, with first phase to open in December 2010
  • NEVADA ECONOMY: State showing some life at last
  • MARKETPLACE: Herbst Gaming reduces staff
  • NEVADAN AT WORK: Twenty-year veteran of openings prepares for CityCenter
  • Pinnacle CEO resigns
  • Michigan resident is youngest to win World Series of Poker Main Event




  • Home auctions are becoming more common in Nevada as the number of foreclosure filings increases to a rate three times the national average. The state had 5,116 filings in June, about one out of every 200 households, Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac reported.

    The auction process is comfortable for buyers because of its "nonconfrontational" format, McCormack said. Prospective bidders can view the properties and get purchasing terms at the company's Web site.

    A recent auction held by Dallas-based Hudson & Marshall in which some 90 foreclosed homes were auctioned drew criticism from local real estate agents.

    Eric Young of Liberty Realty said he tracked the auctioned properties through the Multiple Listing Service and only one property showed a change in status from "available" to "pending" in the first week after the Aug. 5 auction.

    The MLS status for 16 of the 83 homes sold at the auction suggests that the high bidder at the auction may have met the reserve requirement of the banks, Young said.

    Andrew Pugh of SellFastLV.com said the Marshall & Hudson auction may be more "hollow" than he thought.

    "It looks like the banks are asking for higher bids from anybody on 16 of the properties that were supposedly auctioned off," he said. "I wonder if the winning bidders backed out or the banks are just fishing for more money?"

    A classified advertisement in the Las Vegas Review-Journal shows a foreclosed three-bedroom, two-bath home available for $49,900 in central northwest Las Vegas. The cheapest home at Hudson & Marshall's auction was a 770-square-foot condominium on West Bonanza Road that was listed at $75,000.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 27 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    jdk wrote on September 03, 2007 10:31 PM: Here is the bottom line and it doesnt take a rocket scientist to come up with the following conclusion.

    Until wages come up dramatically in this city and Las Vegas gains more major corporations like Microsoft or Boeing real estate in Las Vegas will either continue to drop or stay cool.

    In Las Vegas from 1999 to 2005 prices escalated at ridiculous levels as compared to other parts of the country.

    Due to income levels not increasing at the same rate, and rent being considerably cheaper then say California, real estate values in Las Vegas will drop until the prices are more realistic. Eventually prices will go up again, but only with time, inflation, increased wages, and rental rates.

    Otherwise it would be better for an investor to rent low, and save residuals for other investment opportunities. Even a decent CD rate at 5.30 percent which is FDI insured is better than investing savings in any real estate that will depreciate even by small margins.


    Report abuse

    Average Vegas wrote on August 24, 2007 08:41 AM: To all those who claim Vegas has affordability issue: Average price of a home in U.S. is supposedly $240,000. So Vegas is near average! So you need to move to one of the many other towns that have lower than average prices okay.


    Report abuse

    David Sieradzki wrote on August 23, 2007 08:47 PM: I am a Home Inspector that has owned a home in Henderson. I see a lot of homes all over the United States, and follow the market closely. I can say that these homes are never going to sell like thay did in 2001 if these people think that they are going to get $500,000 for a $250,00 home. If the people would sell the home for a realistic price, they would not be in forclosure, and not effect the family credit report.


    Report abuse

    Court of Realistic wrote on August 23, 2007 05:54 PM: Decision: Realistic is right, Even More is wrong. They could even afford a fixed-rate loan. If not, they should get a condo and "work their way up" (which is a traditional rule), as is the tradition of "saving" (rare quality these days) and putting a large down.

    Even More, go to California and then explain the "rule". Then go all over the country (average price is around $200K), and try again. Don't forget about $160K condos!!!


    Report abuse

    Game Show!!! wrote on August 23, 2007 05:38 PM: Bob Jack, you assume equity exists to drop prices. Most people in trouble, were irresponsible and manipulated for 100% financing (i.e., loan = value). Many are now upside down (i.e., loan > value). They walk, prompting foreclosure. I agree with the others that Lenders use the auctions to try get more, based on the "hype" generated in the auction process that drives prices up (bidder battles and bidder fever. The auction last month even had an organ player to electify the crowd. It was sooo silly! Most just spectate. It was like watching a Game Show!


    Report abuse

    willy wrote on August 23, 2007 05:23 PM: I'd like the RJ to send Hubble out and do a good story investigating how much of the problem is caused by way too many agents still trying to make a living. In my 3-4 block area I counted 11 houses for sale, every one had a different agent. Of those 8 of them seemed severely overpriced based on what Zillow says the value is. Now Zillow isn't the authority, but I get a sense this is a common theme throughout the Valley. These desperate agents won't say no to home sellers who refuse to accept market conditions. If we cut out a lot of these struggling agents and were left with stronger agents who have a backbone not to list something that has zero chance of selling, that 30,000 inventory would drop significantly.

    Fact is I think a lot of people are listing their houses with little need to sell. They'd like to sell at their price, but if they don't get it they will just keep it out there in hopes a sucker comes along.

    So Hubble Smith, why don't you try to figure out of the 30,000 listings out there, how many are actually serious sellers. I'd guess a better inventory number would be 15-18k homes with the rest just dreamers who will still own their home a year from now.


    Report abuse

    Vegas Radar wrote on August 23, 2007 04:52 PM: Just in case you missed it yesterday PO- I'll post it here again for you

    The sky is falling if your Countrywide
    The sky is falling if you want a loan over 417K
    The sky is falling if you counted on the make-believe equity in your home
    The sky is falling if you work in anything associated with real estate

    Buh-Bye


    Report abuse

    Vegas Radar wrote on August 23, 2007 04:25 PM: Realstic, an INTEREST ONLY LOAN!!!!
    WTF? Why even buy?
    Do YOU have an IO loan?
    If you do than your an idiot
    If you don't-go do it and tell me about what a good deal that is


    Report abuse

    kenodave wrote on August 23, 2007 03:17 PM: Keep talking Realistic, you might convince yourself.


    Report abuse

    Even more realistic wrote on August 23, 2007 03:16 PM: Using time tested rules, a family with a 60K annual income cannot afford to borrow more than 180K (3x their annual income). So yes, a 260K house is too expensive.


    Read All Comments