Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Saturday
Mar 20, 2010
Some Clouds
Some Clouds 62° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Business


Tough spot for some lenders

Stung by foreclosed properties, hard- money officials lack license to manage

Nevada's hard-money lenders, who use investor money to make development loans secured by real estate, now face a dilemma.

The vast majority of hard-money loans have been foreclosed on in the wake of the collapse of the real estate bubble.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Dispute settled, Strip resort renamed
  2. Trump project will cut smaller checks
  3. Sandra Bullock still poised for successful future
  4. Community banks endure hurt
  5. IN BRIEF
  6. In Brief
  7. Nevada businesses support clean-energy measure
  8. Titus, Berkley say they will vote for House bill; 'public is demanding this,' says Titus
  9. Demi Moore's Twitter account part of suicide help
  10. NV Energy tests smart meters in new valley initiative

  • NV Energy tests smart meters in new valley initiative



  • But at the same time, the hard-money lenders don't want to abandon investors who now hold interests in foreclosed properties, said Corrine Cordon, president of Capella Commercial Mortgage and president of the Private Lenders Group.

    Many hard-money lenders would now like to manage those properties. The problem is: Most hard-money lenders don't have a real estate license required for managing properties.

    Mortgage Lending Division Commissioner Joseph Waltuch discussed the issue Friday with 30 hard-money lenders at the Bradley Building, 2501 E. Sahara Ave. Another dozen participated by teleconference from Carson City.

    The commissioner regulates mortgage brokers, including those who solicit investor money to make hard-money loans backed by real estate. The loans typically had double-digit interest rates that attracted many investors looking for higher interest than they could earn on bank accounts and certificates of deposit.

    Real estate values collapsed over the last couple of years in the wake of massive residential mortgage defaults. More than $1 billion in hard-money loans are now delinquent or foreclosed. Few borrowers are current on hard-money loans.

    Some investors in hard-money loans have traded their stakes in foreclosed real estate for interests in business trusts established by hard-money loan brokers. Others object to the business trusts and complain they have no way of finding other investors who share ownership with them in foreclosed properties.

    While the names of investors are public record, Waltuch said giving out contact information could be a violation of privacy laws. He suggested giving investors in hard-money loans an opportunity to waive their privacy rights so that other investors could contact them.

    Waltuch said he also could adopt a regulation, directing lenders who manage foreclosed real estate to obtain property management licenses from the Real Estate Division.

    However, Waltuch fears that it will take longer than a year to get new regulations adopted, approved by the Legislative Counsel Bureau and certified by the secretary of state. In a year, the state Legislature will be convening for its next regular session.

    David Goldwater, president of Goldwater Capital and an influential former Democratic assemblyman, said many hard-money lending rules should be handled through legislation rather than regulations.

    "We could be here for months debating these issues," Goldwater said.

    Cordon urged the division to start writing new regulations.

    Waltuch said the division could write proposed regulations that could serve as guidelines for hard-money lenders while waiting for approval of the rules or new legislation.

    "The Legislature has directed us to act (on regulations), and we will act, and we can do most of this, if not all of it, by regulation," Waltuch said.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Huh? wrote on February 06, 2010 07:16 PM: There's no "tough spot" here... if they do not financially qualify for a loan (20% cash down and the loan does not exceed 25% of their real income) and if Harry or BO does not "legislate" they get a loan anyway... then deny them THE loan. What's so tough about this?


    Report abuse

    sircules wrote on February 06, 2010 11:08 AM: To Just Tired...

    LLC's insulate you from personal liability related to the property. They are a good thing, not a bad thing. Why do believe that hard money lenders should offer to manage REO's for free? Do you have any idea how much work, money and man-hours it takes to manage a portfolio of REO's? It literally takes a full time staff. You are far better off paying a professional group to manage it for a small fee than trying to do it yourself. A professional staff will get more of your back money back for you than you and 20 other small investors running around like chickens trying to manage your own property. Do you know how to pursue personal guarantees of the original borrower? Or to manage capital call short falls for critical expenses? Or to search out and negotiate with developers that may want to develop your property? Or when to sell and when to hold? I assure you that there is a lot you do not know about this subject.


    Report abuse

    Scott wrote on February 06, 2010 11:03 AM: Ummm....where to begin?

    Hard money lenders are totally screwed because they don't have a license to manage property! Uh...then go get one? Last time I checked real estate school took about 12 weeks and if you can do basic math you should be able to pass. I have worked with plenty of real estate bimbos who probably couldn't even pass the GED so there is no way getting that license is difficult.

    Secondly...to those who complain that hard money lenders screwed the investors our of their hard earned money....OF COURSE THEY GOT SCREWED. If you were investing in a hard money lending syndicate it was inherently VERY VERY RISKY! Do you think people were paying 10%-18% on those loans because they were a good credit risk?

    Hard money by very definition basically means you are going at it the hard way!


    Report abuse

    Wes wrote on February 06, 2010 10:18 AM: I did not know we had a shortage of Real Estate Licensee's that are property managers. Why do they not employ these brokers already licensed?


    Report abuse

    1Raven wrote on February 06, 2010 08:24 AM: Obama has reason to know his recent nationalization of the home mortgage market will both destroy housing as an appreciating investment and evaporate equity in homes belonging to millions of Americans.

    The Treasury Dept. recently removed a $200 billion cap on aiding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac providing each company a taxpayer blank check to cover mortgage losses. Because the two companies secure 70% of new home mortgages, that will leave only a tiny number of private mortgage lenders. Meanwhile Rep. Barney Frank is again advocating loans to unqualified-homebuyers foreseeable to cause more foreclosures, forcing down home prices that support $Trillions in bank held mortgages: U.S. taxpayers just spent $billions to prop up banks after the sub-prime mortgage crash. Dropping home selling prices are already causing local governments to collect less property tax, forcing layoffs of government employees. Consequently CA and other States are now raising State income and other taxes to recover lost revenues.


    Report abuse

    just tired wrote on February 06, 2010 07:39 AM: Most investors are disgusted with the Hard Money Lenders that recklessly endangered their livelihood by continuing to encourage ever increasing loan amounts on undeveloped properties even, in my opinion, when the "insiders" knew they were beginning to have a problem.

    The hastily passed AB 513, section 8, which deals with defaulted deeds of trust was written in such a simplistic form that people don't like to "read the words" of it when trying to determine what it means. Remember that "the words speak for themselves."

    From my perspective, AB 513 allows for 51% of the beneficial interests to make decisions for 100% of the owners in most cases of making decisions regarding either the current defaulted deeds of trust, or even after foreclosure regarding property ownership and operating decisions.

    Unfortunately, too many people will never agree with the majority and withhold their support for the majority vote and either not participate at all or purposely hinder movement going forward without some "additional" consideration for their vote....hmmmmmm.....sounds like Congress!!

    This problem of non-cooperation and mistrust is ever present throughout society, and will hinder the ability to manage these deeds and/or properties on a go-forward basis.

    The Hard Money lenders want to manage to keep their doors open, by extracting more fees from those that have lost all current cash flow from their investments, in addition to the hundreds of millions of dollars of equity investment that is worth, perhaps, 15-30 cents on the invested dollar...of course without 51% agreeing to sell at a low level, this equity is illiquid.

    The investors in these deals would be naive to think that the hard money lenders have the investors best interests in mind....they only have their own interests in mind, otherwise they would offer to manage for free!!

    I challenge them to offer just that!!


    Report abuse

    roger wrote on February 06, 2010 06:07 AM: Hard money investors lost their investments and homeowners lost their equity, so where did the money go? Maybe the owners and executives of these companies? The money went to someone. Now, who exactly was regulating this business? Under what lending guidelines and federal regulations did these businesses operate? They have a nearly 100% default rate and people are blaming banks for making bad loans? Gee I wonder how many loans coming from these outfits were no doc loans? These defaulting loans were made to buyers who never should have gotten loans, they pushed up demand and caused all our prices to go up. Now they default and we all lose big time, who can I talk to about that?