Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Business

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
Business


Harrah's ordered to hand over bettor's documents

A Clark County District Court judge on Friday ordered Harrah's Entertainment to turn over documents related to gaming activities of a high-roller accused of bouncing checks totaling $14.75 million at two of the company's casinos.

Omaha, Neb., businessman Terrance Watanabe is facing up to 28 years in prison on four felony counts of theft for writing bad checks in 2007.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Boyd won't bid on Station Casinos' properties
  2. Silverton to restore part of employees' slashed pay
  3. Bank of NLV ordered to increase its capital
  4. Shares of gaming companies wilt in July
  5. IN BRIEF
  6. FTC: No more upfront fees for companies to help consumers



Watanabe lost nearly $127 million in 2007 at Caesars Palace and the Rio. He paid $112 million of the debt but is disputing the rest, claiming Harrah's reneged on promises to return some of his losses. He also argues that he was too intoxicated to be held accountable for his losses. He claims Harrah's supplied him with drugs and alcohol to lower his capacity to act competently.

Harrah's, which is not a party to the state's case against Watanabe, sought to quash a defense subpoena for the documents. The company said complying would put an unreasonable and oppressive burden on the company.

Judge Jennifer Togliatti limited the documents that need to be turned over to the defense to those from Jan. 1, 2007, to Jan. 31, 2008.

The defense had asked for documents about Watanabe's activities from Jan. 1, 2006, to April 28, 2009.

The documents ordered turned over include logs on Watanabe's gaming activities and casino markers, pre-shift briefing notes on Watanabe, his history of casino credit at Harrah's Entertainment, records of any prescription and nonprescription drugs provided by casino employees, and records of alcoholic beverages served to Watanabe.

Togliatti also agreed to review in private surveillance video, audio recordings and photographs that the defense says might show Watanabe was too incapacitated to make sound judgments.

She also requested to view in private documents submitted by Harrah's to the Nevada Gaming Control Board regarding Watanabe's activities during 2007.

Gaming regulators have opened an investigation into whether Harrah's violated any gaming laws in its handling and treatment of Watanabe.

Harrah's attorney Dominic Gentile said after the hearing that the company agreed all along that Watanabe is entitled to materials relevant to his defense.

"But what the judge said today is that a criminal defendant like Mr. Watanabe doesn't get to go on a fishing expedition," Gentile said. "We're very pleased with this ruling."

Watanabe's trial is scheduled to begin July 12.

Contact reporter Arnold M. Knightly at aknightly@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (20)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

A Gamble wrote on February 04, 2010 03:01 PM: The $$$ amount is irrelevant. A bounced check is a bounced check. He shouldn't have written a check if he knew it would bounce. The more money someone has, the more entitled they feel they are. I'm not a casino lover, but if you are blowing that kind of cash versus helping others who are in financial trouble in this day & age, then you deserve everything you get...or should I say lose.


Report abuse

lou wrote on February 03, 2010 09:59 PM: Isn't it ironic that they are accusing a whale of "going on a fishing expedition"? LOL


Report abuse

Frank wrote on January 30, 2010 07:23 PM: Harrahs got 112M dollars out of one guy, it's ridiculous that they are going after another 15M, their greed may cost them the whole amount.


Report abuse

Bradgore wrote on January 30, 2010 06:14 PM: DMCVvegas: I agree with your opinion on donation. I used the term based on what he recieved vs. what he paid as a loose metaphor. I simply feel that the cold and heartless corporate mentality of the gambling purveyors is brought to the surface here. I understand the logic in that he lost and must pay. I also believe this is not a good thing for society. Globally gambling is viewed as a serious public health problem for very good reason. We disagree I am sure and I respect your opinion. I would prefer to work in a cancer research institute and relate more to the thrill of winning in that realm. It is the marketing of gambling to the masses, and the thrill that you speak of, that points society (and this man) more in the direction of the casino and farther away from endeavors that benefit humanity. The man in the article could of done something great for his community. Instead he went to a gambling joint in Las Vegas. Sad story.


Report abuse

DMCVegas wrote on January 30, 2010 05:23 PM: Wait bradgore, how is being rich and spending money in ways that entertain you without harming others "Bad Karma"?

Gambling is NOT a donation situation at all. It's strictly games of chance, with the thrill of winning whenever that happens to you. If he lost the money fair and square, he should pay his debts. If Harrah's did in fact allow him to play in an inebriated state, then that is in fact wrong, and they should be denied any moneys considered as their *winnings*.

Don't blame gambling here. Sure the games are stacked in a casino's favor, but that is apart of the price that you pay in order for a casino to offer a player those higher value stakes, not to mention host the games themselves and the guests in agreeable accommodations.

If you've got the money that you can afford to lose, and you yourself are a fair player who understands the risks involved, gambling is an honest trade and pastime for all involved.

People profit fairly, and even you your self benefit from the effects of gambling as you don't pay any State Income Tax on your wages. Now if you want to talk about dishonest gamblers who do in fact hurt people and profit off of the unbearable losses of people, we can discuss Investment Bankers and Hedgefund Managers...


Report abuse

bradgore wrote on January 30, 2010 04:53 PM: This seems a simple tragicomedy of the forces of greed and evil destroying the life and fortune of a rich man. Perhaps it is grand karma but the reality of the magnitude of what could be done with this amount of cash is sad to contemplate. Had he simply donated to a worthy cause back home he could of funded an entire cancer research facility for decades. Instead he made the error of comming to Las Vegas and donating to those who clearly have no sense of honor or appreciation for what he did donate and have the insane stance that, in the grand scheme of society, the donor is the criminal.


Report abuse

stationary wrote on January 30, 2010 04:21 PM: Hey, the man is cutting into Gary Fatboy's bonus. Of course Har de har hars will persue this into the next century, if necessary.


Report abuse

X Doc wrote on January 30, 2010 03:21 PM: It would be wise for Harrahs to forget about it,he 'll pay sometime in the future,maybe not ,but you have taken enough.Harrahs is embarrassing the State of Nevada and must be held accountable for bring greedy pigs.


Report abuse

John Boy wrote on January 30, 2010 01:30 PM: The guy has already paid back $112 million so obviously he has the $, maybe he has a case about the rest, who knows. All I know is the money sucking casinos could care less about this man, and I hope they eat the other $14 million!!


Report abuse

DMCVegas wrote on January 30, 2010 01:11 PM: Trying to tie George Bush into the argument has completely invalidated your point. The legal issues associated with asbestos predate either one of them. Get your facts straight.

As far back as the 1960s (and possibly earlier) evidence arose that asbestos posed a health hazard. Various industries that were involved with the mining and manufacture of products associated with Asbestos did suppress that information, yes. With mounting legal pressure, a voluntary reduction/suspension of Asbestos used in the construction industry in 1980 and earlier in the garment industries (fireproof clothing like head socks) led the the halting of lawsuits. That 20 year span is where the actual legal problems arose from.

Continuing on, what of my statement of Asbestos exposure is inaccurate? People have worked in office buildings for years and have been safe. Like I also said, automobiles themselves are the biggest consumers of Asbestos products to this day. But amazingly not everyone who has even been around a car has gotten sick from asbestos. Why is that? Well because you missed my earlier point, it's because of HOW you are exposed to Asbestos that can make you sick. Hold a chunk in your hand? No, you won't get cancer. Start crumbling some asbestos insulation in your hand and start sniffing it, or doing demolition work without proper respirators and ventilation in a building that contains it? Well then, that's a different story... So once again, what was I wrong about?

You want to do another comparison? Look at your lawn outside. There's a good chance that it's contaminated with anthrax, especially if it's sod imported from a farm. Does that mean if you go barefoot you're gonna die? No. You have to INHALE anthrax, just like Asbestos for either one of them to hurt you.


Read All Comments