Business

Las Vegas home prices fall below 2000 levels with no relief in sight

  • LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

  • LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

  • Jessica Ebelhar/Las Vegas Review-Journal

    A for sale sign stands Tuesday in front of a home on Solana Del Norte Way in North Las Vegas. SalesTraq says the median existing-home price is $110,000. » Buy this photo

  • Las Vegas Review-Journal File Photo

    Home prices in Las Vegas are at their lowest in 11 years, a new report from Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller shows. » Buy this photo

By Hubble Smith
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Mar. 29, 2011 | 7:30 a.m.
Updated: Mar. 30, 2011 | 6:42 a.m.

Maybe this is the Final Four.

Home values in Las Vegas, Atlanta, Detroit and Cleveland are now below January 2000 levels, according to a report released Tuesday.

The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller 20-city index shows price declines in 19 cities from December to January. Eleven of them are at their lowest level since the housing bust, in 2006 and 2007. The index fell for the sixth straight month.

The only market where prices rose was Washington, D.C., where homes prices gained 0.1 percent month over month.

"The housing market recession is not yet over, and none of the statistics are indicating any form of sustained recovery," said David Blitzer, chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor's.

The pain is not uniform, however. It is worse in cities where foreclosures and short sales are dominating the market and pushing home prices down. That includes Detroit and Cleveland, which are struggling with weak local economies. And it includes Las Vegas, Miami, Phoenix, and Atlanta, which are also reeling from overbuilding during the housing boom.

Las Vegas has led the nation in foreclosures since the subprime mortgage crisis emerged, knocking down home prices 60 percent from their peak.

The median new-home price fell 9.2 percent from a year ago to $188,900 in February, the lowest it has been since 2002 when it was $183,557, Las Vegas-based SalesTraq reported.

SalesTraq figures say the median existing-home price is down 5.4 percent to $110,000, roughly the same as 20 years ago or 1991.

Housing analyst Larry Murphy of SalesTraq said the Case-Shiller index is a "wonderful tool" to compare home prices across the board in 20 cities, but it doesn't include auction sales and doesn't show how the market "shakes out" for itself.

"They're only off by a few years -- like 10 years or something," he said.

Murphy predicted more pain.

"We're not out of the woods yet. I'm standing by my prediction of still a couple more years. We've still got a lot of foreclosure shadow inventory in the pipeline."

RealtyTrac Inc. forecast that foreclosure filings might climb about 20 percent in 2011, reaching a peak for the housing crisis.

In the latest report, California cities are faring better. San Diego was the only city besides Washington, D.C., where home prices have risen year over year.

The Case-Shiller gauge, which was created by economists Karl Case and Robert Shiller, is based on a three-month average, which means the January data was influenced by transactions in December and November.

TOUGH MARKET TO SELL

What does that mean for local buyers and sellers?

It's a tough environment to sell a home in Las Vegas right now, but you can get a property sold, said Mark Stark, owner and broker of Prudential Americana Group.

The key is finding a Realtor who understands the market and does their homework, he said.

"You can't toss a house on the market, and it sells. You need someone to do an evaluation of what's going on in that area. Everybody says prices are going down. I can show you areas in town where prices are going up. It depends on the location, the price range, the product type, the amenities," Stark said.

But the pain is acute for homeowners.

Las Vegas homeowner Greg Adamour said he would like to see people become more proactive in motivating banks and politicians to initiate economic reforms.

"They exacerbated the problem, and now they don't care. They're ambivalent," said Adamour, who bought a house at Rhodes Ranch 10 years ago for $415,000 that he now is trying to short-sale for $340,000. It once appraised for more than $900,000.

"It's very unfortunate for us baby boomers who invested in the system. We feel like we've been exploited," he said.

GOVERNMENT ROLE UNDER SCRUTINY

As long as the government continues to handle the foreclosure crisis the way it has, there will never be enough aggregate demand in the housing market to put a floor under prices, said Leonard Tekaat, a retired economic analyst in Bakersfield, Calif.

With Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in federal conservatorship, servicers of mortgage loans don't have enough options to offer struggling homeowners, Tekaat said.

Former Freddie Mac economist Arnold Kling testified Tuesday before the Senate Banking Committee that the most urgent need for housing finance policy today is to ration the use of government-subsidized mortgage credit.

"There is a way to guarantee reliability of mortgages that does not require a government agency," said Kling, a member of the financial markets working group at George Mason University. "The solution is for most borrowers to make down payments of 20 percent, which was typical before the madness of the last two decades.

"What should we say to someone who wants to buy a $200,000 house but has only $5,000 saved up? In most cases, we should say the same thing we would say if they wanted $200,000 in poker chips in Las Vegas or $200,000 worth of stock. We should just say no," Kling said. "With good loans, the mortgage finance business will take care of itself."

Most economists don't see a rosy road ahead.

"Prices will continue to move downward probably for the rest of the year," said David Semmens, a U.S. economist at Standard Chartered Bank in New York. "They won't turn around until you have consumers feel that housing is genuinely cheap and until they feel a lot more secure in their labor-market position."

The Associated Press and Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. Lolly Apr. 14, 2011 | 6:40 p.m. Report Abuse

    When City Center closes there will be more vacant homes.

  2. mrability Apr. 4, 2011 | 10:20 a.m. Report Abuse

    Boot the losers from that stucco shack

    give them 30 days,then sell that crap shack for half the cost to the next sucker

  3. ucmbnko Apr. 3, 2011 | 9:11 p.m. Report Abuse

    why should the taxpayers pay for your home which you shouldn't have ever been in in the first place, nor that you can afford today? who's to say you didn't take out a home equity loan and spent the money on frivolous stuff and now you want tax payer's to cover your home and toys?

  4. mrability Mar. 31, 2011 | 8:54 p.m. Report Abuse

    gbigs

    your mother

  5. gbigs Mar. 31, 2011 | 2:47 p.m. Report Abuse

    Vegas comes in 51st behind DC in education, jobless, foreclosures. this is the city of Harry Reid, of mrability, poor, dumb, white-trash. When the teachers unions come whining to Sandoval, have them explain Vegas.

  6. mrability Mar. 31, 2011 | 11:37 a.m. Report Abuse

    GR8Teacher , Really? LOL Hows that teacher pay working for ya?

    And gbiggot

    How about ,a spelling bee?

    Your biggest problem,is you are a right winger tea bag loser

  7. gbigs Mar. 31, 2011 | 11:29 a.m. Report Abuse

    mrability is a loon. his grammar and spelling are not his biggest problem.

  8. mrability Mar. 31, 2011 | 10:31 a.m. Report Abuse

    Peter Griffin

    Fair enough peter

  9. GR8Teacher Mar. 31, 2011 | 10:31 a.m. Report Abuse

    Sorry Peter griffin...Okay...I was an English major...and mrability’s grammatical errors impede his argument. Sounds like a bunch of BS to me...literally.

  10. Peter Griffin Mar. 31, 2011 | 10:15 a.m. Report Abuse

    @MRABILITY I have NEVER claimed to be an english major. I am a LITERATE person. Most of the people who respond to you mention your "LACK OF ABILITY" when you write. WE ARE NOT ALL ENGLISH MAJORS. HOWEVER, I will not attack another veteran. I am sure we have chewed some of the same mud so I will simply leave it at that. WHOOOWWAAAAAAH!!

Read All Comments

Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Mostly Clear Mostly Clear, 91° Weather Forecast