Business

Massachusetts gaming expansion cost Nevada firms plenty

By Howard Stutz
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Feb. 20, 2012 | 3:59 p.m.
Updated: Feb. 21, 2012 | 8:24 a.m.

The casino industry -- including several companies with ties to the Strip -- spent roughly $11.4 million over the past five years in lobbying Massachusetts lawmakers to approve casinos, according a review of records by the Associated Press.

A Las Vegas-based subsidiary of Wynn Resorts Ltd., Development Associates LLC, spent more than $863,000 on lobbying in the past three years, the records showed. Las Vegas Sands Corp. spent nearly $473,000 on lobbying.

In November, after a lengthy debate, lawmakers approved a bill that legalized three Las Vegas-style casino resorts and a slot machine parlor. The move opened the state to legalized gambling roughly 20 years after casinos opened in neighboring Connecticut. It was the largest single expansion of legalized gambling in Massachusetts since the state lottery was created 40 years earlier.

The bill allowed for a single casino in the Boston area, a casino in southeastern Massachusetts and one casino in any of the four counties in Western Massachusetts.

According to the Associated Press, overall spending on lobbying steadily increased year after year as pressure built to approve a gaming bill. In 2007, the total lobbying tab on the casino issue was nearly $1.3 million. By 2011, that grew to more than $3.1 million.

Many of the companies that lobbied hardest for the expanded gambling law are now actively pursuing the three casino licenses.

The company that spent the most on lobbying was Sterling Suffolk Racecourse, which runs the Suffolk Downs racetrack and is hoping to turn the East Boston facility into a destination casino in partnership with Caesars Entertainment Corp.

From 2007 to 2011, the racetrack spent more than $2.8 million on lobbying, according to the Associated Press review.

Wynn is also seeking the Boston-area license. He is in partnership with Robert Kraft, owner of the National Football League's New England Patriots, for a casino in Foxborough adjacent to the team's stadium.

Las Vegas Sands has not formally entered the Massachusetts casino derby.

M Resort owner Penn National Gaming spent nearly $197,000 on lobbying during the past five years, while MGM Resorts International spent $60,000. The companies are vying for the Western Massachusetts license along with Las Vegas-based Ameristar Casinos, which wasn't listed in the report.

The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, which has until July 31 to negotiate a gaming compact with the state for the southeastern license, spent nearly $850,000 on lobbying expenses in the past five years.

Developers seeking a casino license are required to pay $85 million for the license and invest $500 million into the project.

The state will have a 25 percent tax on gaming revenues.

Yet to be appointed members of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission will choose which casino proposals get the licenses and will also to regulate and investigate the new gaming facilities.

Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871. Follow @howardstutz on Twitter.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. oldPSUguy Feb. 21, 2012 | 6:25 a.m. Report Abuse

    This is exactly why Las Vegas needs to diversify its economy. We can't even depend on the casino establishment here to protect our industry. As gambling is seen as a panacea to budgetary woes elsewhere, gaming will open up to all comers and Las Vegas will be less unique.

  2. serious Feb. 21, 2012 | 5:32 a.m. Report Abuse

    Look for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe to partner with the Tribes behind Foxwoods or Mohegan Sun; why partner with the white man? The Nevada companies are no longer truly 'Nevada' companies, and due to their lobbying efforts over the past 20 years have caused Las Vegas to become a minor league player.

  3. Joe.Johnston Feb. 21, 2012 | 4:40 a.m. Report Abuse

    The article says, "spent roughly $11.4 million over the past five years in lobbying", to me the word lobbying should be replaced with the word, bribing, not just in this article but in everywhere. Lobbying is bribing/influence peddling.

  4. Art.Guterding Feb. 21, 2012 | 4:02 a.m. Report Abuse

    Mass state legislators are not helping the citizens of their state by approving these gameing liscences. Rather, they are just thinking of the tax revenue. lack of state fiscal dicipline cannot be off set by additional taxes. It only post pones the day of reconning. Someday they will have to tell of crumbling education and pension short falls.

  5. Southside Teddy Feb. 20, 2012 | 5:29 p.m. Report Abuse

    Howie you and i know who gets Boston, Gary Lovechecks, Wynn has odds on the Boston license Lovechecks is at 5/2 his money is talking.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Clear Clear, 89° Weather Forecast