Comments (65) | Add a comment
Resort fees let guests choose options, experts fear backlash
-
John Locher/Las Vegas Review-Journal File Photo
MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay are both owned by MGM Resorts International. » Buy this photo
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Feb. 22, 2011 | 7:26 a.m.
Would you plunk down $30 to guarantee that a king-size bed would be waiting for you in Las Vegas?
Although mandatory resort fees have spread among many Las Vegas resorts during the recession, MGM Resorts International has quietly added several options in recent weeks. Besides the bed fee, which allows guests at Mandalay Bay their choice of a king or two queens, MGM now lists differing surcharges for differing check-out or check-in times at several properties and has extended the resort fee to the Bellagio for the first time.
But a $20 charge to guarantee a nonsmoking room at the MGM Grand was quickly snuffed out after it threatened to billow into a public relations fiasco.
"These options provide yet another tool for us to personalize the guest experience, according to each guest's individual preferences," MGM officials said in a statement. "We're receiving some very positive feedback from guests."
Not all of the MGM hotels have the new fees. The ones put into effect vary by property.
But some industry experts wonder whether that will lead the hotels down the same runway as the airline industry, which has become a lightning rod of consumer antipathy for charging extra for everything from checked baggage to food to seat assignments.
Some hotels around the country have listed extended time fees, said Bobby Bowers, senior vice president at Smith Travel Research. Such options largely disappeared during the tight economy.
However, Bowers added, "I don't think I've seen a bed size fee before. It's hard for me to fathom. I think there is definitely the danger of people feeling nickeled-and-dimed for everything they do."
Despite the complaints directed at airlines over what management terms unbundling or a la carte pricing, the extra revenue has contributed to the industry's best profits in years. Many airline executives go out of their way to highlight fee income in Wall Street presentations.
Starting in the current quarter, MGM told gaming industry analysts that it would create a separate line item in its financial reports to show the revenue that comes from the resort fees. That comes against a backdrop of Las Vegas room rates falling 22 percent since 2007, a source of concern to securities analysts, and only recently started to rebound.
MGM acknowledges that some guests might not care about bed size, but others could find them "very important features that can make or break the vacation experience. Guests enjoy the option to guarantee these amenities and leave nothing to chance."
Industry consultant Randall Fine of the Fine Point Group said the latter factor distinguishes the hotel fees from their airline counterparts.
"The airlines took away things that were free and then started charging for them," he said. "But the hotels are offering a service they don't now. How many people leave town on red-eye flights and would like extra time in their rooms?"
On the other hand, Caesars Entertainment has made a point of marketing itself as fee-free and will stay that way.
"When we quote a room rate, that's what people pay," said spokesman Gary Thompson. "We don't believe it's in the interest of customers to charge for things they may not use."
Resort fees began to pop up on hotel bills about a decade ago and brought the industry a black eye because they often were not disclosed until guests checked out. Litigation in Florida led to them being listed up front, said Joseph McInerney, CEO of the American Hotel & Lodging Association.
But the new generation of fees started appearing after MGM finished installing the necessary software. Potential guests must check them to add them to the bill.
What quickly drew the attention of anti-tobacco groups was the $20 the MGM Grand charged for the guarantee of a smoke-free room.
"In typical Sin City logic, the MGM fee punishes good behavior and rewards your vices," wrote Christopher Elliot, the ombudsman for National Geographic Traveler magazine. "Instead of paying extra to smoke in your room, you'll be asked to shell out more to be shielded from cancer-causing fumes."
MGM then dropped the nonsmoking fee.
"We regret having implemented this policy before recognizing the inappropriate message it might have sent to some of our customers," MGM spokesman Alan Feldman said in a statement.
Instead, the hotel cannot provide everyone their expressed preferences, much as airline passengers can be stuck in the middle seat on crowded planes.
But with the lodging industry recovery still in its early stages, said Bowers, "I think continuing to sell value is the way to play it."
Contact reporter Tim O'Reiley at toreiley@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-5290.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
well i guess that i will be staying at Caesars the next time round. All the additional costs (some hidden) are quite annoying. I dont mind paying a higher rate knowing that the price quotes for a room is the price you pay
My goodness, (fill in the blank with whatever "702" you are today)... you cannot seem to get your fill of union advocacy, can you? I didn't read your previous postings, because all of your postings are the same. Greedy corporations who must turn a profit in order to remain (by definition) a greedy corporation, run by "greedy corporate fat cats" (your own words). You are a shill for the union. I am concerned with MGM's bottom line regardless of their embrace of unionism. If you are/were a stockholder, (which I doubt) so are you. That is what this fee is about. Not about unionism and their ability to destroy a company. There are plenty of threads in the forum that deal with that fact. MGM is looking out for my best interest by instituting fees that add to their bottom line. And if and when MGM decides to embrace wholesale unionism, I might divest my portfolio of MGM stock because that is the beginning of the end for profit.
Maybe you didn't read my eariler post where I stuck up for the hotel's and all the fees they waive on a daily basis? I don't hate retired people, as a matter of fact I too owned MGM stock purchased in Nov at 12.10 and sold in Jan at 15.43. All I said is quit blaming the wrong people for the way the hotel is operated. If you want to do any "bashing|" go after the source of the problem, the people running the place, not the Union's. Get your facts right before you accuse someone of being a "hater", read my other post.
Why, suz702? My retired mother owns stock in MGM, as do I. She profits when the greedy corporate "fat cats" improve MGM stock by improving the MGM bottom line. Do you hate retired, old people too? Are they greedy for wanting a return on their investment? Or perhaps, profit is bad? Marxists hate the concept of profit. Are you sure you are not yet another incarnation of BillofRights702?
By the way, none of the MGM properties in Las Vegas are Unionized, Altho we are working on organizing them. So instead of all the Union bashing, how about putting the blame where it belongs on the greedy corporate "fat cats".
From an article on this topic in the Sun: "What’s more, Las Vegas hotels that formerly charged taxes only on the room cost are increasingly taxing the added fees as well, which can inflate the total bill."
mgm greed will be punished for many years
starting with sh tt y center
Just another excuse to relieve us from the weight of our hard earned dollars, down with MGM and all those "Resort Fee" crooks!
I was just pricing my next Vegas trip. All MGM properties are now off my list regardless of which of their properties are implementing this scam. Keep your options you slimeballs!
It is a money maker pure and simple. Resorts pay taxes to the local, state and Federal government on room rental. They DO NOT have to pay taxes on fees. Improves the bottom line. It is the very same reason that the low cost airlines hit you with fees... they don't have to fork over that 7% that takes away from their bottom line. There is no difference between a $100 hotel and a $80 hotel with a $20 resort fee. The hotels don't pay taxes on the $20 fee. It adds up. Who REALLY doesn't like this situation is Prince Harry and Chuck "Slick" Schumer. Harry and Chuck want their money. Your money belongs rightfully to The Government, not the Capitalist oppressors who offer you a service. Like a hotel stay.