Business

Regulator confident Web gaming can be policed

By Steve Tetreault
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU
Posted: Nov. 18, 2011 | 12:22 p.m.
Updated: Nov. 19, 2011 | 7:26 a.m.

WASHINGTON -- A top Nevada gaming regulator assured lawmakers Friday that Internet gambling can be policed with software that ferrets out cheaters and systems that identify underage and addicted players.

The comments from Gaming Control Board Chairman Mark Lipparelli were aimed at fears that online wagering could spin out of control if legalized by Congress.

He said his answer would be "an unconditional yes" if asked whether the gaming industry and states could deal with underage gamblers, betting addicts, money laundering and computer "poker bots" that enable players to cheat.

"You can probably get away with trying to cheat a system, but you will be uncovered fairly quickly," Lipparelli said. "The analytical tools that are being employed are very robust. You might be able to get away with it once, but you will leave big fingerprints behind."

Lipparelli's testimony came before a House commerce subcommittee studying online gambling in response to a bill to legalize web poker and another that would open the door to a broader array of games.

Also testifying were Frank Fahrenkopf, president and chief executive of the American Gaming Association; addiction researcher Rachel Volberg of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago; and Charles McIntyre, director of the New Hampshire lottery.

McIntyre came with a specific message: If Congress legalizes online poker, states have infrastructure in place through their lotteries to claim a piece of the action.

A path for the bills remains unclear. Industry officials say a poker-only bill is more likely to advance, but subcommittee chairman Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., made clear after the hearing that nothing will move fast, if at all.

Democrats Friday urged Bono Mack to hold another hearing to probe officials from the departments of Justice, Treasury and Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission, which would likely have a role in overseeing online gaming.

"For anything to continue to move, it would take more hearings, but at this point I have not said yes or no," said Bono Mack, who told the audience at Friday's hearing she was taking a "careful approach." She said it would probably be early next year before she sets the next steps, if any.

Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, chief sponsor of the poker bill, said "the votes are there" to pass his bill, but "if they want to have another hearing I am open to that."

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., is negotiating a separate online poker bill. Major casinos have held off backing any bill until his version emerges.

Earlier this fall, Barton and others pushed for the deficit reduction supercommittee to embrace the legalization of Internet poker before it reaches a deadline of next Wednesday. But the supercommittee remains deadlocked over issues much larger than card games and appeared unlikely Friday to come up with a solution to the debt crisis.

Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. Worldofslots Nov. 23, 2011 | 12:18 p.m. Report Abuse

    Funding toward the issue would not be allowed in online casino's if it was illegal. Protecting people from gambling can only happen if it's regulated. Otherwise online casino's are more underground and money for the issue is not there because it's not supported.

    Sharon
    worldofslots.com

  2. fast eddie Nov. 21, 2011 | 8:45 p.m. Report Abuse

    If they can catch cheaters? Why have they not arrested anyone. Every Cheater in the world is online playing poker. two plus two caught more than Poker Stars and if they get kickecd off they are back on in 30 minutes. The group from China was caught by Players not the site. What they are saying is if you win you will be investigated by the thousands of new online police? Or I guess you wont be allowed to talk on the phone or texr message even Skype from the privacy of your Home.

  3. gehrig Nov. 19, 2011 | 10:04 a.m. Report Abuse

    does this gaming "official" get paid by taxpayers ? ignorance cannot be fed at the public trough.

  4. JR Nov. 18, 2011 | 2:56 p.m. Report Abuse

    Hilarious! What happens if the internet sites get hacked? Then what? A bunch of empty promises by empty suits blinded by greed. Take a look at what happened with the Sony servers on their Playstation network. Hackers love a challenge, especially one involving corporate greed.

  5. Couch Potato Nov. 18, 2011 | 1:41 p.m. Report Abuse

    las vegas promises to prevent prostitution and crime from occurring and blah blah blah.
    why waste time and money on the charade phase of a scam with costly smoke and mirrors.
    just get on with it and start the profit sharing.

  6. William924 Nov. 18, 2011 | 1:36 p.m. Report Abuse

    Just like the Nevada regulators control skimming, what a joke!

  7. Warhammer Nov. 18, 2011 | 1:31 p.m. Report Abuse

    Congress has to get involved since they are the ones that made a federal law against on-line gaming.

  8. Couch Potato Nov. 18, 2011 | 12:44 p.m. Report Abuse

    they promise to make sure no bank bail outs will ever take place.
    why is congress hearing private business issues ?

  9. Squires.Bond Nov. 18, 2011 | 12:29 p.m. Report Abuse

    Just more foxes guarding the hen house. Don't believe anything the bought bureaucrats, bought politicians or bought police force tells you. They all lie. They've sold all decency. They've sold their consciences. A Faustian bargain as old as humanity.

  10. rdisman Nov. 18, 2011 | 12:27 p.m. Report Abuse

    LOL....So can online porn, online predators, online scams, online viruses, etc.

Read All Comments

Thursday, May 24, 2012
Clear Clear, 84° Weather Forecast