Comments (134) | Add a comment
NV Energy looks at 5 percent rate increase to cover electricity conservation costs
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Oct. 21, 2010 | 8:43 a.m.
Wednesday brought a first look at how Nevada's new electricity rate-recovery process will work, and that glimpse included word of a potential rate increase of just less than 5 percent for Southern Nevada customers of NV Energy.
A 2009 state law requires power utility NV Energy to change how it accounts for the financial effects of its energy-efficiency programs. The company once included conservation costs in the general rate cases it submits to the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada every three years, but it now must file those efficiency expenses separately each year.
In its first individual energy-efficiency filing Wednesday afternoon, NV Energy said it would need an April 1 rate increase of just less than 5 percent in Southern Nevada to recoup expenses and revenue lost to power conservation. But company officials said other types of filings could curb that impact, and the new filing schedule will save consumers money in the long run.
"Through demand-side management (efficiency programs), ratepayers benefit from the avoided cost of more-expensive generation and purchased power," said Robert Stewart, NV Energy's senior vice president of customer relationships. "These programs are more cost-effective than building new generation."
Eric Witkoski, the state consumer advocate who represents the interests of utility ratepayers, didn't respond to a request for comment on the new filing.
But Stephen Wiel, the Nevada representative for advocacy group Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, agreed that the new filing process would benefit utilities and consumers alike.
"If it's a 5 percent increase, it's in order to avoid a future increase of over 10 percent to generate electricity for customers to waste," Wiel said. "This is going to keep the company investing in demand-side management, and that's good for customers."
The new filing schedule's twin purposes are to provide incentives for utilities to develop energy-efficiency programs and to eliminate the interest costs that come with paying for those conservation programs over time.
Take those incentives first.
Energy efficiency carries an up-front price for NV Energy. In its Wednesday filing, the utility said its conservation efforts will cut about 5 percent from the revenue the Public Utilities Commission will allow it to capture in 2011, including $71 million in expenses such as rebates to consumers who participate in conservation programs, and $35 million in lost revenue as ratepayers use less juice.
Absent a mechanism to recover that revenue, the expenses would discourage any utility from promoting power savings, which would in turn raise long-term costs for ratepayers, Stewart said.
"The energy-efficiency programs that we run are generally twice as cost-effective as building power plants or purchasing power," he said. "Those savings free up capacity to serve other customers and allow us to avoid building power plants."
The new filing structure also should mean lower interest expenses.
Under the previous energy-efficiency recovery regime, NV Energy could recapture conservation costs only every three years, when the law requires the utility to file general rate cases to recover operating expenses.
In that three-year period, interest would accrue on NV Energy's conservation-related losses. Moving recovery to an annual process eliminates those ratepayer-funded carrying expenses, some of which can cost millions of dollars, Stewart said.
Although the requested increase is around 5 percent, Stewart said, it is too early to say what will happen to rates when the tariff kicks in on April 1. That's because the Public Utilities Commission will weigh the rate at the same time it determines quarterly adjustments in the price NV Energy pays for the power it buys from outside generators.
Those tweaks could counterbalance the energy-efficiency increase.
Stewart said energy prices are too volatile for him to forecast purchased-power rates as far out as the spring, but those costs have been on the downswing. The Public Utilities Commission cut NV Energy's purchased-power rates in Southern Nevada by 1.6 percent on Oct. 1, thanks partly to a continued slide in year-over-year natural-gas prices.
There will be a transition period for the new conservation filing schedule because some energy-savings costs are still stranded in the existing general rate structure. Sometime in 2013, NV Energy will account for all of its efficiency costs annually and separately from its general rates.
Consumers should know about one other major rate-filing tweak.
The Nevada Legislature in 2009 also changed NV Energy's general rate filing schedule. Previous law required the company to file its general rate cases in December, with new rates subsequently kicking in the following June.
In an effort to buffer consumers from potential rate boosts in the warmest part of the year, the Legislature moved the filings to June, with rate changes effective in December.
Under the new law, NV Energy will file its next general rate case in June, which means it'll come 2½ years after the utility's last filing, instead of the three years the law mandates. After 2011, the general rate case schedule will return to its full three-year cycle.
Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@review journal.com or 702-380-4512.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
There is change coming. Harry Reid is not going to be part of it. We'll have a Senator who represents Nevada's interests, and not their own---change is coming...and Harry--you're done.
What is Harry's position on?
"stimulus, healthcare reform, card-check, GM takeover or cap-and-trade"
"stimulus, healthcare reform, card-check, GM takeover or cap-and-trade"
"stimulus, healthcare reform, card-check, GM takeover or cap-and-trade"
It's the heart of the dems agenda---but he never wants to talk about it? Why is that??
While 57 percent say the Tea Party will not be a factor in their vote for Congress, fully 70 percent of voters support the "main issues the Tea Party has raised" -- calling for lower taxes, less government spending and less government regulation. That includes 49 percent of Democrats.
EDITORIAL: Reid blocks ACORN probe
Tracking abuse by political allies could be 'distracting'
ACORN -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now -- is stinking up Washington.
And this is far more significant than if a suspiciously large number of operatives for a purely "private" outfit had been found systematically bending and breaking the law, because ACORN receives and spends taxpayer money -- lots of it -- and had carried the imprimatur of official partnerships with the IRS, the Census Bureau ... the kind of "cred" that in the political world comes only from "who you know."
Yes, ACORN has friends in high places -- friends who are still stonewalling attempts to trace where all that tax money went ... perhaps because they know who still has cookie crumbs all over their hands.
Al Jazeera News Middle East
Iraq war 'lost' says top Democrat
The US war in Iraq is lost and a further build-up of US troops in the country will not recover the situation, the senior Democrat in the US senate has said.
"This war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week," Harry Reid, the senate Democratic majority leader, told reporters.
Reid, who held talks with George Bush on Wednesday, said he told the president that he thought the war could not be won through military force.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2007/04/2008525142923542568.html
VOTE
Harry had a quite a good thing going with Acorn last time around. Don't think so much help will be thee this time.
House Votes to Strip ACORN Funding
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09/17/house-votes-to-strip-acorn-funding/
There is no stink that does not cling to your hero renostarman. You'll have to get used to it, people know and they will fight back now. Harry Reid and his crooked machine are going to lose this election. No "Acorn" no union payoff no Soros international money will save him. He is done.
"..among those in the Democratic consulting class, there’s a gloomy acknowledgment that many of the incumbents the DCCC has spent millions of dollars to protect won’t be coming back to Congress."
“Everybody that is tied will lose, and everyone that is ahead by a few points will lose because of the GOP wave,” said one party media consultant who is involved in a wide array of House races. “There are going to be some surprises.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/44448.html#ixzz145ybS2LP
Solar and wind receive subsidies of over $23/Mwh (megawatt hour) compared with $1.59/Mwh for nuclear, $0.44/Mwh for conventional coal, and $0.25/Mwh for natural gas.
For your home they want a 90% increase in the price of your electricity costs.