Comments (35) | Add a comment
New OSHA rule requiring more violations ruffles feathers
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
The state of Nevada plans to crack down on unsafe conditions at construction sites and other workplaces, but local builders say the effort isn't needed and will result in unwarranted citations written to meet quotas.
The Nevada Occupational Safety and Health Administration now requires its 41 investigators to find serious, willful repeat violations on at least half of their inspections. Before Friday's change, state inspectors were averaging 22 percent on finding serious, willful repeat violations.
The nationwide OSHA average for inspections resulting in that level of violation is 79 percent.
"The feds told us, 'You guys need to improve your game,' " said Steve Coffield, chief administrative officer of Nevada OSHA. "They're not saying we have to go out and find serious citations at every place we go because we're not going to. But they are saying that our performance basically has to work toward being as effective as federal OSHA's."
That explanation doesn't satisfy some local contractors, who say the rule amounts to a quota that will prompt inspectors to hunt for major violations that don't exist.
"It's like telling policemen they have to write more tickets. They'll stop you in a 55 mph zone and say you were going 56," said Bob Potter, president and chief executive officer of Affordable Concepts, a Las Vegas construction company that builds schools, banks, medical offices and restaurants. "It's important for contractors to maintain an exemplary safety record, but under this new guideline, I can assure you it will be impossible."
The new policy comes from a 2009 U.S. Department of Labor investigation into Nevada OSHA following a rash of workplace deaths from 2004 to 2009. High-profile fatalities included six construction workers at CityCenter, two at Cosmopolitan and two maintenance workers at The Orleans. From January 2008 to June 2009 alone, 25 Nevadans died on the job.
In an 80-page report on its findings, the Department of Labor criticized Nevada OSHA for failing to cite serious, willful repeat violations of safety laws and for failing to determine if companies ever fixed hazards noted in previous citations. The report added that Nevada OSHA's inspectors showed limited understanding of construction-safety hazards.
Coffield, who took the chief administrator job in September 2009, a month before the feds released their report, said it's not clear why state inspectors averaged 22 percent on finding serious, willful repeat violations. It could be because inspectors saw serious problems and intentionally ignored them, or because inspectors weren't trained well enough to spot on-the-job dangers.
The federal report's 18 recommendations included more training programs.
Nevada OSHA is also bringing on three staff trainers to meet the requirement, and will add four inspectors, boosting its ranks by nearly 10 percent, to 45, later this year. At the peak of the state's building boom, from 2006 to 2007, it had 38 inspectors.
Potter and other builders said the hiring "flies in the face of logic."
The agency will increase its investigative activities in the midst of a recession that wiped out nearly 100,000 construction jobs in the state, Potter notes. In mid-2006, Nevada had 148,800 construction workers, with one OSHA inspector for every 3,916 workers. Construction employment in the state has fallen to 54,700, and by fall, OSHA will have one inspector per 1,216 laborers.
"It's kind of like going and fixing the gate on the corral after all of the horses have left," Potter said. "They're absolutely right -- there were some significant violations on CityCenter. But they're taking the entire construction industry to task because of the violations of one general contractor. It's not fair at all.
"If you hire many more inspectors than you had before, and create an atmosphere where they're required to write more citations, you're going to develop a situation where the bulk of citations are going to be meritless," he added.
Nor do officials with the Las Vegas chapter of the trade group Associated General Contractors believe the new violations policy is necessary.
"We would agree it's not needed. We think that the majority of Southern Nevada contractors are incredibly safe," said Mandi Lindsay, the association's government affairs director. "What happened with CityCenter was an anomaly. We were in record growth with respect to building at that time. The reality is, there are only a few bad seeds out there. They should concentrate on those (companies), as opposed to a mass effort of looking at everyone."
But it doesn't matter how much construction and business activity has dropped in Nevada, Coffield said. The federal government still requires inspectors to find more violations. He added that Nevada OSHA offers a free consulting service through which businesses can invite inspectors to job sites to point out hazards. The agency won't cite companies for violations found during voluntary consultations.
He also said there are no performance incentives to meet the quota, or punishments for failing to meet it. Inspectors who miss the mark just get more training.
"Besides, if you're following the rules, and OSHA comes to visit you, you're not going to have a problem," Coffield said.
Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Ok here is a comment. You don't like what NV OSHA is going to do regarding stepping up on violations? Well I guarantee you that you will really not like it when the FEDs come down on things because NV OSHA can't do their job and prevent on the job accidents, not to mention deaths. The FEDs will be 100 times worse then anything that NV OSHA could do. So go ahead and belly ache over what NV OSHA is going to do and see what happens, because you will really be bellyaching when the FED crack down. Yeah, there maybe plenty of safe companies out there, but I can tell you that even those can use wake up calls from time to time so they don't relax so much as to get someone killed. Construction industy you did not police your own and now it is coming back to haunt you. You were so concerned about making the bucks that things got away from you, so now it is time to pay the piper, so do me a favor and just shut the hell up.
Federal MSHA is NO better than NV Mine Safety Training Section, having refused to do a walk on safety inspection @ Round Mountain Gold Corp for a TIMELY complaint filed with-in 60 days of reported safety, health, harassment violations and false records to MSHA with Boulder City with Tim Fisher and John Melfly. Nevada miner workers continue to have no Safety Oversight in Nevada. Big Mining is to big to be held accountable and working miners suffer for the payoff to Nevada's top elected officials. According to a letter from MSHA Dr Gregory
Wagner to Paul Rupp. . . " a cab fire in a moving haul truck (as reported) must burn before for 30 minutes before MSHA will investigate". Nevada miners have no safety oversight in Nevada! PRupp B125 SP NV 89047
Federal MSHA is NO better than NV Mine Safety Training Section, having refused to do a walk on safety inspection @ Round
obviously just another money grab from the private sector to the public parasites, lmao, now that the lemonade stands have to have permits I guess these new "inspectors" will be checking them out for violations, when is enough , enough ? Just what any industry needs, more inspections, permits, fee's, licenses , taxes............the public parasites will suck the blood out of everything until there is nothing left for anyone, then they will try to suck the blood out of each other.............pathetic public parasites running this country into bankruptcy.
Steve Coffield NV OSHA C.A.O. and Ed Tomany NV Mine Safety and Training Section C.A.O. are a big part of the problem. After ALL when a C.A.O. Top safety Wonk says we do not know why. . . its easy to see Nevada suffers from bad management at the top of workers safety programs. It all starts at political donations to Nevada's upper elite elected officials. Try and get a walk on safety inspection for formal violations and false record keeping in Nevada's mining industry.
Does anyone here know why, and under what circumstances OSHA was created? What is the purpose of OSHA? Anyone know?
What this will become (or already is) is a tool for unions to use against employers (businesses). OSHA complaints, fines etc... just more of the...well, you know...Chicago way mentally flowing down from the DC.
VOTE RIGHT FOLKS - WE need people in office that have real AMERICAN VALUES, TRADITIONS and PRINCIPLES. The type that made this the strongest, Bravest, most Prosperous nation on Earth.
MORE government. Higher taxes.
Nevada Dept of Business and Industry is the very essence of corruption. NV OSHA Steve Coffield was promoted from with-in at a time when new management was sorely needed. NV Mine Safety and Training Section Ed Tomany and Jeff Bixler and other officials continue to violate the oath and bond for the pay check received while refusing to perform required inspection of violation(s) and records of the violators. NV Mine Safety and Training Section Officials continue in violation of NRS safety standards, their oath and bond and committing serious civil rights violations by their actions. PRupp B125 SP NV 89047
How about a new OSHA citation and rule. No workers allowed on the job site that don't speak ENGLISH!