Business

Parts of valley see improvements in home prices in 2010

  • John Gurzinski/Las Vegas Review-Journal

    A bank-owned home at 1504 N. Winwood St. is pictured Feb. 2 in the 89108 ZIP code of Las Vegas. The area saw flat home values in 2010. Of 56 ZIP codes in the valley, 13 showed appreciation in values, two were flat and 30 had depreciation limited to single digits. » Buy this photo

By Hubble Smith
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Feb. 13, 2011 | 2:02 a.m.
Updated: Feb. 13, 2011 | 5:15 a.m.

The "Biggest Loser" in Las Vegas is not a reality TV show, the university football team or even the unfortunate saps who keep the lights aglow on the Strip.

It's homeowners in ZIP code 89119 around McCarran International Airport, where the median home price dropped 24 percent, or $20,000, last year to $65,000, Las Vegas-based research firm SalesTraq reported.

The residential area borders a mix of industrial zoning and the average home is nearly 32 years old, or twice the Las Vegas Valley average, SalesTraq President Larry Murphy said. It's also got a heavy concentration of lower-priced apartment conversions.

Runner-up was ZIP code 89015 in Henderson, which saw a decrease of 17 percent, or $20,504, in median home price to $99,496. In terms of absolute value, homes in ZIP code 89144 in the Summerlin community lost $21,500, or 12 percent, to $163,500.

The best thing that can be said about Las Vegas home values is they've ended their precipitous fall and have actually risen in some parts of the valley, an analysis of sales by ZIP code showed.

Of 56 ZIP codes in the Las Vegas Valley, 13 showed appreciation in home values, two were flat and 30 had depreciation limited to single digits. That's welcome news from 2009 when every ZIP code showed depreciating values and the average decline was 23 percent.

Murphy makes the caveat that no two homes are exactly alike, and that a comparison of median prices simply means half the homes in a particular area sold above the median and half sold below.

"Everyone takes a look at this and makes the erroneous assumption that this is my house," Murphy said of his ZIP code analysis. "This is not your house. It's all the houses in your neighborhood, all the condos, all the apartment conversions. It even includes mobile homes."

Foreclosures and short sales -- which account for roughly 70 percent of all sales -- continue to place downward pressure on Las Vegas home prices. The government's Home Affordable Mortgage Program and Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative accomplished little in stemming Nevada's foreclosure crisis.

Inventory of homes for sale in Las Vegas climbed to 21,656 at the end of last year, an increase of about 2,000 homes from the previous year, a result of weak demand and tighter lending requirements.

For the first time in three years, Las Vegas didn't make the list of U.S. cities with the steepest declines in home values, often dominated by areas that were hardest-hit by the housing bust. They include Miami; Orlando, Fla.; Atlanta; and Chicago, real-estate website Zillow.com reported.

Overall, the median Las Vegas home price fell to $120,000 in 2010, a decrease of $4,500, or 4 percent, from the previous year, SalesTraq reported.

On the plus side, top gainers were ZIP codes 89030 in the middle of North Las Vegas and 89109 around the Las Vegas Country Club, each posting an 11 percent increase in home values. ZIP code 89109 led Las Vegas with a 60 percent decline in 2009.

"Some of this has to do with where we are on the recovery curve," Murphy said. "My feeling is we're at the bottom of it. Areas that went down the earliest and fastest will also be the earliest and fastest to come back up."

Murphy said he wouldn't be surprised to see about half of the valley's ZIP codes finish in neutral to slightly positive territory this year.

"I think Las Vegas as a city is ahead of the national recovery curve, probably six months to a year ahead of the rest of the country," Murphy said. "My point is we're probably the single most affordable major metropolitan area in the country."

David Brownell of Keller Williams Realty said the Las Vegas housing market stayed pretty constant in 2010 without a lot of surprises.

"Those who projected the beginning of a turnaround were left to grasp a few glimmers of hope that came to pass and those who warned of another year of further crashes throughout the market -- the doom-and-gloomers -- were also off the mark," he said.

Inventory declined in December for the first time since April, but remained 50 percent above 2009 levels, taking out pending and contingent offers. Real estate-owned, or bank-owned, and short-sale inventory rose 58 percent and 68 percent, respectively.

"The next wave of REOs may be upon us," Brownell said. "We shall see."

He counted 1,880 bank-owned home sales in December, the highest number since March. The general consensus that short sales -- or lender-approved sales for less than the mortgage balance -- would surpass REOs in 2010 proved to be wrong, he said.

They came close in June, when 34 percent were short sales and 38 percent were REOs, but the spread widened toward the end of the year as REOs accounted for about half of December sales.

SalesTraq's Murphy put the REO inventory at 12,442, including 3,433 available on the Multiple Listing Service, leaving an unlisted inventory of 9,009 bank-owned homes.

CoreLogic, a Santa Ana, Calif.-based foreclosure information tracker, recently reported that one-fifth of Las Vegas homeowners with a mortgage are 90 days delinquent on their payment, which equates to about 75,000 homes facing foreclosure or short sale.

This pipeline of distressed sales will keep Las Vegas home prices down for the next couple of years, Murphy said.

The good news is that Las Vegas homes are the most affordable in the country and very attractive to retiring baby boomers who don't care about the area's 15 percent unemployment rate, he said.

"They still see all the positives that were here before and they don't need a job, so who cares?" Murphy said. "They've still got to sell their home back in Minnesota or somewhere, so we're not going to see the influx until they can get rid of their property in other parts of the country. But when they can get the same house here for half of what it is back there, you may see some baby boomers drop their price by one-third or more and come out here and get the same house for half as much. That may be one saving grace for our market."

As far as buying a home based on a particular area of Las Vegas, Murphy said it would depend on the buyer's motive. An investor might want something affordable that can easily be rented out, while an owner-occupant would look at neighborhood amenities and other criteria.

"That's going to vary with each individual. For me, I'm going to buy something in a golf course community," Murphy said. "Bottom line is if you can afford to buy, now is the time because there's a great selection of homes. If you want to look like a genius in five years, buy real estate today in Las Vegas."

Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. Star_Dancer Feb. 18, 2011 | 10:20 p.m. Report Abuse

    gbigs: "81% of Vegas homes are UNDERWATER. there is no turnaround in housing in Vegas. these stories are horribly malicious. you will not see home buying before the jobless rate reverses, and you wont see that in Nevada for decades."
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
    So true. I'm letting my home go. Appraised in 2006 for $295K and now worth $80K. You can all put me down and say what you want but I'M losing thousands that I have put into my home over the last 22+ years. I bought a 5th wheel and a truck and that's where I'll be living. I'm not waiting around for this market. This article is BS.

  2. team nohrden Feb. 15, 2011 | 2:51 p.m. Report Abuse

    If you drive around any neightborhood in the Las Vegas Valley you are guranteed to see a vacant house if not multiple per street. Most people are just letting these house go which can take a while for the banks to foreclose. One thing many people have decided to advantage of are short sales. Short Sales will outnumber foreclosures but there are many people that don't know what alternatives to foreclosure are available. www.stevenohrden.com

  3. mrability Feb. 14, 2011 | 4:44 p.m. Report Abuse

    housing is a loosers game

    welcome to the american nightmare losers

    lol

  4. justanoguy Feb. 14, 2011 | 1:29 p.m. Report Abuse

    "the highest number since March. The general consensus that short sales -- or lender-approved sales for less than the mortgage balance -- would surpass REOs in 2010 proved to be wrong, he said."

    Short sales will NEVER surpass REO's in actual sales because more then half of short sales DO NOT close and end up as Bank Owned Properties....

    Whoever came up with that General Consensus statement is WAY off the Mark..

    And that is the first time I've ever heard anybody make that prediction... so I don't think it was a "General Consensus"..

  5. husky Feb. 14, 2011 | 11:09 a.m. Report Abuse

    @gbigs, I'm not sure if this is true, but it may explain why the banks are not lending.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssl5yb7FewA

  6. gbigs Feb. 14, 2011 | 8:24 a.m. Report Abuse

    i see most here do not understand what is happening. they are cash buyers because they are buying short, discounted big, from the banks, and the banks are NOT lending on these properties.

    in other words, these are BETS that housing will not drop another 50%. these people will lose.

  7. husky Feb. 14, 2011 | 7:57 a.m. Report Abuse

    Since 50% of all sales are now cash buyers, I would say that's a very good indicator of putting your cornflakes somewhere close to the milk. Go and look at the tract homes they are talking about, the only way these homes sold the first time was because you didn't need any cornflakes to get them.

  8. gbigs Feb. 14, 2011 | 6:51 a.m. Report Abuse

    nothing negative about telling the truth. go ahead, buy something vegastart, put your cornflakes where your milk is.

  9. Marky Mark Feb. 13, 2011 | 8:45 p.m. Report Abuse

    Beware, there is another wave of ARM's resetting soon and Chase and B of A is resuming their foreclosures. In about 3 or 4 years we might start seeing small price increases overall...

  10. VirginMaryTheShlut Feb. 13, 2011 | 7:57 p.m. Report Abuse

    Overpaid 100 gs for mine worth every penny though to have bought a home with no asholiation . Man up you - you sighned the
    papers- pay up - Who cares what its worth any ways - WHY NOT TRY TO CLIMB BACK INTO THAT CAVE YOU CRAWLED OUT OF AT YOUR BIRTH - INSTEAD OF COMPLAINIG OR WALKING AWAY- ON A SERIOUS NOTE GOD BLESS US ALL-
    AND GOD FORSAKE US ALL TOO- ITS ALLGOOD IN THE HOOD

Read All Comments

Thursday, May 24, 2012
Clear Clear, 83° Weather Forecast