Comments (9) | Add a comment
Wynn investor will have to wait on documents
-
Jerry Henkel/Las Vegas Review-Journal
Wynn Resorts attorney Kirk Lenhard argues Thursday in Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez's court in the case of Okada v. Wynn in the Regional Justice Center. » Buy this photo
Tools
More Photos
-
Kazuo Okada
-
Steve Wynn
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Wynn Resorts Ltd. board member and largest stockholder Kazuo Okada will get his chance to examine normally confidential company documents, but his win comes with a large asterisk.
At a Thursday morning hearing, Clark County District Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez ruled that his position as director allows him to delve into company records as long as his requests are "reasonable."
She gave the company two weeks to review Okada's list, document by document, and either allow him access or reject it. She will then decide at a Feb. 23 hearing whether Okada has the right to see any documents Wynn deems confidential.
In wrapping up the brief hearing -- neither Okada nor company Chairman and CEO Steve Wynn were in the courtroom -- Gonzalez said she had "serious questions" about some of Okada's requests, but that others would likely pass muster. She did not tip her hand, however, about any details.
In his Jan. 11 complaint, Okada demanded documents that would trace how $120 million that he invested in the company's predecessor a decade ago was spent; the circumstances of a $135 million contribution to the University of Macau last year; and a revised 2010 shareholder agreement that followed the divorce of Steve Wynn and board member Elaine Wynn. The agreement allows Steve Wynn to vote not only his stock but also Okada's and Elaine Wynn's, about 40 percent of the total.
Okada was the lone dissenter when the 12-member Wynn board approved the University of Macau donation. The lawsuit blew into the open a boardroom dispute that had previously been shielded from outsiders. In fact, Okada's ouster as vice chairman last October, a post he had held since October 2002, was announced only the day after he filed his lawsuit.
A week after going to court, Okada upped the ante with a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that said he would nominate his own slate of three directors at the next annual meeting, plus a fourth if Elaine Wynn chose to step down.
The public relations firm that Okada retained in connection with the fight called the court ruling "a validation of Mr. Okada's role as a director."
Okada, a citizen of Japan who lives in Hong Kong, controls 19.7 percent of the Wynn stock through Aruze USA, a unit of his Universal Entertainment Corp. Universal Entertainment's website goes so far as to describe Wynn Resorts as a joint venture between it and Steve Wynn.
Wynn Resorts declined to comment Thursday. But in an interview with the Las Vegas Review-Journal on Feb. 1, Steve Wynn predicted that the case "will be easily dismissed."
Okada's representatives maintain that their client has a right to know how the company is spending his investment.
"The right to inspection is essential to good corporate governance," Okada attorney Gidon Caine argued at the hearing. Later, he added, "Mr. Okada should have the same right of inspection of the records that Steve Wynn does."
But Wynn Resorts attorney Kirk Lenhard sought to set the case in the broader context.
"What we are asking today is to protect the integrity of the board of directors," Lenhard said.
Instead of going to court, he contended that Okada should have laid out his case at the next board of directors meeting, scheduled for Feb. 24. Taking the issue to court, he said, threatens to "emasculate" the board to suit just one director and could lead to "corporate chaos" for companies incorporated in Nevada.
The subtext to the dispute, mentioned only obliquely at the hearing, is the $2 billion Manila Bay Resorts in the Philippines. Universal Entertainment broke ground on the project last month, although Wynn Resorts has shunned any involvement out of concern that it could siphon customers away from its Macau property and future developments.
Wynn has said that Okada had "gotten himself into trouble" with Manila Bay, but has not provided details
"Mr. Okada does, in fact, have interests that are adverse to the company," Lenhard said in court.
Contact reporter Tim O'Reiley at toreiley@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-5290.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Please finish this story and ask Gonzalez what "serious concerns" she has about some of the questions asked by Okada. This guy put 120 million into the business - what in the world is going on in there that is NOT his business?
EYE-ON-VEGAS: Something is wrong with me. 11 to 1 ... Until I read your comment, the thought of Elaine is 1 of 11 never occurred to me. Thank you for clearing me.
Now we wil find out who contributed the most to the elect Gonzalez campaign.
Four of the twelve board members also serve on the Wynn Macau board. All financials are available online at Wynn Investor Relations. For those interested always check Las Vegas based publicly traded casino company's Proxy Statements--I guarantee you will be so outraged per executive compensation, remuneration and perks that you won't drive within a mile of any of the respective properties--ever again. Back to the subject: Mr. Okada's dissenting vote is of interest. Why? Was it based on business ethics? In fact, Elaine Wynn voted "yea." Consequently, the "grease money" passed her personal ethical threshold. At least Judge Gonzalez has recognized a director's fiduciary duty and the standard of reasonableness. What choice did Mr. Okada have--the odds were 11 to 1. Wynn's attorney K. Lenhard's statement is actually an expression of how futile it would have been for Mr. Okada to present his request to the board.
Kazuo Okada got hosed
Mrs. Ed, you are probably right. But if Mr. Okada wins, I hope he contributes to our school system instead of Macau. It is refreshing to me to be with you all people here. I was writing to crime area and some of them are gruesome with police beating innocent citizens. From now on, I will read you and other people's comment here than getting angry there all the time.
Wynn will never see a dime of my money, nor almost all of my friends. In fact, I can't think of one local who ever goes there. His Vegas property is dying - only Macau is keeping them afloat.
TWO WEEKS TO COOK THE DOCUMENTS ????
Wynn is obviously being racist against this investor because of his national origin.