Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Living


CANCER FIGHTER: TEST CAUGHT UP IN CONTROVERSY

Fear could keep people from useful colonoscopies




Know another potential victim in the public furor over reported unsafe health practices at several local endoscopy clinics?

The colonoscopy, the procedure that 40,000 patients were undergoing when they may have been exposed to HIV and hepatitis at a handful of outpatient surgical centers. In the wake of the revelations, valley physicians are hoping the crisis won't dissuade Southern Nevadans from undergoing the simple, painless, potentially life-saving procedure.


Most Popular Stories
  • LIFE ON THE COUCH: Frustrating 'Mad Men' season full of ups and downs
  • MIKE WEATHERFORD: Smaller fish finding more wiggle room on Strip
  • ON THE SET: CINEMA CITYLas Vegas is Cinema City
  • BAZAARS: Consumers, charities benefit from sales at holiday bazaars
  • TRIP OF THE WEEK: Rogers Spring a scenic natural oasis
  • More adults getting their kicks from playing soccer
  • HUMAN MATTERS: Life's journey includes pain of suffering
  • MIKE WEATHERFORD: Book reveals Gans' grudge
  • NFL FOOTBALL: LINE UP FOR A NEW SEASON
  • THE R-J GOES TO A PARTY: Las Vegas Philharmonic Guild aids Kids to Concert




  • Colonoscopy is "the gold standard for detecting and screening for colon cancer," said Dr. Sunil Sharma, chief of the gastrointestinal oncology program at the Nevada Cancer Institute, and "it's very important that that continue."

    As medical procedures go, a colonoscopy is, mechanically speaking, as straightforward as it gets. Using a long, flexible, camera-equipped tube, a physician examines the lining of the entire colon, looking for polyps -- abnormal growths that can become cancerous -- lesions or other suspect masses and taking biopsies as necessary along the way.

    Dr. Joseph Thornton, a colon and rectal surgeon and associate professor of surgery at the University of Nevada School of Medicine, said advances in both technology and equipment during the past 35 years have made colonoscopy a safe, effective means of detecting colon cancer.

    Colonoscopies even can play a key role in preventing cancer. During the procedure, a physician can remove polyps he or she sees in the colon. And, because colon cancers can begin as polyps, "taking out precancerous polyps before they turn cancerous can prevent you from getting cancer," Thornton said.

    According to Thornton, about 93 percent of colon cancer occurs after the age of 50. That's why it's recommended that people who haven't already had colonoscopies begin having them at age 50, and even earlier if a close relative has had colon cancer or certain other conditions exist.

    "The earlier we find (polyps), the better their survival statistics," Thornton said. "If you become symptomatic, that decreases the chance you will be catching this at an early stage and decreases the chances of a patient's survival."

    Yet, an estimated 50 percent of Americans who should be getting colonoscopies aren't. One reason, Sharma said, is that many regard colonoscopy as an uncomfortably intrusive procedure.

    "A lot of people don't like the idea of the prep and don't like the idea of not eating for 12 hours (beforehand)," Thornton added.

    Preparing for a colonoscopy includes dietary restrictions for a day or two and then, on the day before the procedure, taking strong laxatives to empty and cleanse the colon.

    Some patients are nervous about the procedure itself. "Most people ask me, 'Am I going to be asleep?' " Thornton said. "Yes."

    The procedure is painless. Dr. Jonathan Zucker, a Las Vegas anesthesiologist and president of the Nevada State Society of Anesthesiologists, said patients typically awaken afterward with "no memory of the procedure."

    Thornton said the colonoscopy itself usually takes 10 to 15 minutes, and, after awakening in the recovery room, patients usually are "out of the facility in 45 minutes."

    Colonoscopy is one of several procedures -- others include tests that detect blood in the stool, barium enemas and flexible sigmoidoscopy, in which only the lower portion of the colon is examined -- that can be used to help detect colon cancer. The most recent addition to the medical arsenal is the virtual colonoscopy, or CT colonography, which uses imaging technology to visualize the colon.

    Earlier this month, a national task force developed guidelines for employing CT colonography as a cancer screening measure. According to the American College of Gastroenterology, while CT colonography requires no sedation, it does require the same bowel prep routine as a standard colonoscopy.

    Sharma said virtual colonoscopy can be useful in instances in which a standard colonoscopy can't be done. But, he added, a standard colonoscopy permits a physician to remove a questionable polyp or lesion and take biopsies on the spot, while polyps found during a CT colonography must be removed later via a standard colonoscopy.

    Right now, Thornton said, "the gold standard by far is the colonoscopy. It offers direct visualization and you can do something (to a polyp) if you see it."

    But, whatever the technique, valley physicians hope that questions surrounding practices at the various clinics under investigation won't taint the worth of the colonoscopy itself.

    A colonoscopy "can make a real, huge difference in people's lives," Sharma said. "In a way, it's a tragedy if this kind of furor that's going on will actually diminish rates of screening."

    Colonoscopy, Thornton agreed, is "very fast, very efficient and, most of all, can prevent you from winding up with (cancer) surgery and the things that go along with a diagnosis of cancer."

    Contact reporter John Przybys at jprzybys@reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0280.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    GET IT NOW wrote on March 20, 2008 10:16 AM: If you need a colonoscopy, get it now as there is no better time.

    It's like a plane crash. The safest time to fly is after a catastrophic event. Everyone will be double checking everything.

    It's a year down the road when all the hoopla settles and clinics fall back into routine that you need to worry.


    Report abuse

    "SIN CITY" - well deserved-- wrote on March 20, 2008 04:09 AM: I am a retired RN already battling cancer. I had 3 exposures during the time frame at Shadow Lane & several before there as well. Each time was a horrific experience beyond belief of which I complained to many different sources every time. I was never recovered. Was hanging over a wheelchair, unable to dress myself or talk & pushed out of the place to my car. Last time there my appt. was at l:00 & I wasn't even taken back for the exam until close to 6:00 & left at 7pm. There were over 40 pts. before me, not enough chairs to even sit on, couldn't use the washroom because it was the filthiest I have ever seen in my life, etc. I could go on & on with many other situations through the years. I always called it the "drive thru" endoscopy center. Now I have to get tested again in a few more weeks because the tests I already had a few wks. ago were too soon after my exposure. I again have to wait & worry about the results & then be tested 6 mos. later again to ensure I don't convert to positive. I feared for my safety/life going there but it was the only place Sierra would allow me to go. I told them of my previous experiences & concern to no avail. Now, if I sue- I plan on sueing them as well. Others should hold their Insurance Companies accountable as well. I will never have another endoscopy procedure again unless it is at a hospital & hopefully never in this town. I'd rather take my chances!!!