Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Living

Thursday
Mar 18, 2010
Mostly Cloudy
Mostly Cloudy 64° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Living


Language packs a punch in culture

'Tropic Thunder' latest movie to make a point by playing off viewer sensitivities

Francisco Menendez recently told some colleagues that he had caught a showing of "Tropic Thunder," the Ben Stiller-Robert Downey Jr. summer hit that last weekend remained the No. 1 movie in the country.

"And somebody said, 'Oh, you saw it in a place where there were no pickets?' " said Menendez, chairman of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas' film department.


Most Popular Stories
  1. High hopes turn to broken dreams for several local projects
  2. Celebrities aren't the only ones who say Scientology helps them
  3. Las Vegas reaches out to college students looking for cheap fun
  4. Time for men to grow up, seek real intimacy over porn
  5. Plenty of reasons to just say no to Leno
  6. Las Vegas pawnshop center of new reality series
  7. Facts meet logic in ticket game
  8. New church offers public information center to explain Scientology
  9. Junior League honors women at local benefit
  10. Not a down moment in 'Musical of Musicals'




Menendez suspected picketers might be upset that Downey plays nearly the entire film in blackface. But, he recalled, "they said, 'No, it was about the disabilities.' "

During the movie, and in service to a key plot point, the word "retard" and its variations are used liberally. That has prompted criticism from disability rights groups and, in some cities, protests outside theaters showing the movie.

Although the medium (a comedy) and the focal point (a word that isn't a racial slur) may be a bit out of the ordinary, the film has reignited American culture's continuing debate about what can, or should, be said and done in the name of art.

The scene at issue in "Tropic Thunder" is a conversation between actors about how to win awards by playing mentally challenged characters. Downey's character advises Stiller's that Oscar voters prefer only partially challenged characters, and that playing "full retard" never wins awards.

Boycotts of the film have not occurred in Las Vegas, but several moviegoers who saw it last week at Galaxy Theatres at the Cannery had no problem with the scene.

"It's just real slapstick" and typical Hollywood comedic fodder, said Jim Chilton of Florida, who was in town visiting his daughter.

"That's just Hollywood," he said. "It's a movie, and if it offends you, then don't go to it."

"The controversy didn't offend me personally," said Jevon Yeretzian, 26, who saw the film with his brother, Shahe, 23.

But, said Jevon -- who's stationed in Korea with the Air Force and was in Las Vegas to visit Shahe -- "I can definitely see how it could offend others."

Linda Smith hasn't seen the movie. But Smith, chief development officer of Opportunity Village and the mother of a son with Down syndrome, is not sure the use of "retard" or variations of it are ever warranted.

Media portrayals of the disabled can be powerful, said Smith, who considers 1988's "Rain Man" a "landmark movie on a lot of different levels, because you saw that this (character) was profoundly disabled, yet you loved this character."

Smith saw that movie with her son. And, while leaving the theater with Chris, "people were turning around and smiling at him and looking at him and accepting him," she said. "That's vivid in my memory."

And if she and Chris were to see "Tropic Thunder"? "I don't know that there would be the same reaction," Smith said.

Given the movie's use of a word employed solely as a mean-spirited epithet, Smith isn't sure she'd want to see "Tropic Thunder" herself, even though "I don't know I'd be one of those outside boycotting it."

Nell Minow, who writes "Movie Mom," a column on Beliefnet.com in which she evaluates movies from a parent's perspective, argues that protesters' ire is misdirected.

"Tropic Thunder" doesn't lampoon the disabled, Minow said during a recent phone interview, but, rather, the self-absorption of Hollywood and actors who offer one-dimensional portrayals of the disabled and then congratulate themselves for it.

"As a person with disabled family members and whose first job was working with what we then called the 'retarded,' I've been appalled at movies that get all kinds of critical praise, like 'I Am Sam' and 'Forrest Gump,' because I think they're terrible portrayals of disabled characters," Minow said.

"Too often in movies, the disabled aspect is the character's defining trait," Minow continued, and disabled characters exist only to "inspire people and/or give (other characters) an important lesson about compassion. That's about it, and this is wrong. Disabled people are interesting human beings who've got really interesting stories to tell."

In "Tropic Thunder," the word "retard" is used to "show something about the person who said it," Minow said, and the film makes "a very trenchant and powerful argument in favor of the disabled being treated well by showing that the person who didn't understand was a nincompoop."

Similarly, even as Downey plays a white actor who darkens his skin to play a black character, the film is "very intelligent in giving the actual black character the power and moral weight in the movie," Minow said.

Crossing or at least dancing perilously close to the line of social acceptability isn't anything new, artistically speaking. Comedy, in particular, "has always poked fun at sacred cows," Menendez said. "That's one of its functions in society."

But effective comedy and satire also require that the audience consider a film "in its entire context," he continued, and not make a judgment simply on the basis of having seen a YouTube snippet or a trailer.

Words do have meaning, Minow said. "But we cannot let words be divorced from their context. That creates an inhibition in our frank discussion."

In a way, the "Tropic Thunder" debate mirrors the debate about whether racial slurs should ever be used in art, be it hip-hop, TV, movies or such acknowledged classics of literature as Mark Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."

Rainier Spencer, director of the Afro-American studies program at UNLV, doesn't favor racial slurs in any usage. But, he said, one consideration in judging whether to use them is to ask if "there is an artistic purpose to it."

That could take the form of a "documentary angle," he said, in which a film may depict somebody using a word because the character actually does or would. Or, Spencer said, it could take the form of using the word in the service of "lampooning" a larger issue.

Still, the reality is that somebody somewhere probably will be offended by just about anything. Jaq Greenspon, a master's in fine arts degree candidate and English composition instructor at UNLV, once sold a script for the TV series "Star Trek: The Next Generation" that was a takeoff of Stephen King's novel "Misery."

"The idea of the story was that somebody was an ardent follower of Picard and kidnapped him and wanted him, basically, to tell him about his exploits," Greenspon said. "What we were doing in fairly clear terms is, we were mocking the obsessed 'Star Trek' fan. In fact, that was why they bought the episode. Originally, they said, 'That's brilliant.' "

But, Greenspon continued, "the next producer said, 'We can't make fun of our fans.' "

So, Greenspon said, the script was rewritten.

Studios and artists often can be afraid of offending people, Greenspon said. And, on the other side of the artistic equation, audiences often can be "so quick to be offended that we don't actually look at the message. And there's the problem: As soon as you take something out of context -- as can be seen in any political ad of the last 25 years -- it's very easy to become offended by it."

Actually, Menendez joked, given "Tropic Thunder" and its deft evisceration of Hollywood and the actors who inhabit it, "I'm surprised actors aren't picketing the film."

Contact reporter John Przybys at jprzybys@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0280.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Joe C wrote on September 08, 2008 01:24 PM: This movie was hilarious and you didn’t feel it was insulting the way they used the word.
As a matter of fact Minow was completely accurate describing the scene and use of the retard word.

It you just want to laugh this is a moving to see.

Big blow up about nothing trying to make another made up PC cause to show others what power PC still has left. Gee,look what we did to the big shots in Hollywood and their movie.

Forget all this Bull and just see the movie and laugh. Great slapstick.


Report abuse

Justice wrote on September 08, 2008 01:05 PM: It seems like some people just can't take a joke. In all comedy, someone has to be the butt of the joke. That's the way it's always been. Humor is found in everyone, every group, every race. If you can't take a step back and laugh at yourself, then you have some serious issues. When Eddie Murphy in Raw (back when he used to be funny) made fun of a white guy dancing, I totally saw myself in that skit and said "OMG, that's me!" I had to laugh. Or when Brenden Frasier did Airheads making fun of Heavy Metal guys (which I was at the time playing in hair bands in Hollwyood) I didn't take offense, because I know who I am and that he was just doing a parody. Lighten up people and have a laugh. Life's too short.


Report abuse

Deidre wrote on September 08, 2008 09:50 AM: I agree Ted. This is a basic problem with our society today. There are groups that want to decide what I can watch on TV, listen to on the radio, watch in a movie theater, and it also goes as far as to try to determine what kind of sex or who I have sex with.


Report abuse

Ted wrote on September 07, 2008 07:57 AM: So called "rights groups" and PC police are certainly entitled to object to things they disagree with, and exercise their right not to go see a movie they find objectionable. The problem arises when they attempt to usurp the rights of other people to see it themselves. Tomato/Tomahto.