Baby boomers come face to face with America's faltering economy - Living

PRINT THIS Popular

Sep. 21, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Baby boomers come face to face with America's faltering economy

By JOHN PRZYBYS
REVIEW-JOURNAL

Baby boomers Natalie and Doug Ahlstrom look over the investments they have planned for retirement.
Photo by John Gurzinski.

Like most first- and middle-wave baby boomers, Natalie and Doug Ahlstrom can feel their retirement getting closer and closer all the time.

Natalie, a self-employed bookkeeper, and Doug, an architect designer, are both 51. And, even as they continue to sock money away in their retirement accounts, a less-than-vibrant economy is making them re-think their golden years.

Most Popular Stories

WHAT'S FOR SUPPER?: These Las Vegas personalities deserve 'turkey' status

'Regis and Kelly' bringing chat to Strip

MIKE WEATHERFORD: Comedian gives back for holiday

BAZAARS: Consumers, charities benefit from sales at holiday bazaars

MIKE WEATHERFORD: Days of markups coming to end?

THE R-J GOES TO A PARTY: Nevada Cancer Institute honors Heather Murren

HUMAN MATTERS: Text messaging and love can be a tricky combination

THE R-J GOES TO A PARTY: UNLV Foundation's dinner honors donors

LEGENDARY LAS VEGAS HEADLINERS: RUSTY WARREN: Life of the Party

SSSSSHH: Hey, Keep It Down

The basic problem: a stock market that "keeps going down and not up," Natalie says.

For retirement-minded boomers, the current economic slowdown -- not to mention last week's dizzying stock market -- couldn't have come at a worse time. And, for boomers who haven't saved as much as they should have or would have liked to, it's serving as one very stark wake-up call.

Tom Salway, a registered investment adviser with ING Financial Partners who also teaches retirement planning at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, senses boomers' apprehension about retirement often, even among boomers who've planned well.

"When they come in here to make a decision to retire, it's probably the most fearful, scary time of their lives," Salway says. "They're just looking at me, pleading with me: 'Are you sure we're OK? Are you sure we can do this?' "

In April, AARP commissioned a survey of people age 45 and over to see how middle-age and older Americans are responding to the current economic slowdown.

According to the survey, 63 percent of respondents say they own stocks individually or through mutual funds, IRAs or 401(k) retirement plans. Of those, 72 percent say they've lost money on those accounts over the past 12 months. (Of course, the survey was taken before Monday's precipitous stock market decline.)

The survey also said 23 percent of boomers who have lost money in stocks say those losses have prompted them to postpone plans for retirement. And, for those between 55 and 64 years old, 32 percent say their losses have done so.

Current economic conditions aside, many boomers simply aren't putting enough money aside for retirement. Salway estimates that, based on class members' responses, "maybe 5 percent are truly in a financial position (for) what we'd call a, quote, 'comfortable' retirement."

Why aren't more boomers saving as well as they should? First, Salway says, is the fact that "very few of the people coming through the door have a pension anymore."

Boomers' parents probably enjoyed the benefit of a pension, in which they would receive a set amount monthly after working for their company for a specified number of years. Today, such plans aren't as common, and boomers themselves bear the burden of putting money aside in IRAs or other self-funded retirement plans.

"So all they're counting on is 401(k) plans," Salway says. "And, many of them, raising children and families, didn't really contribute as much as they should have, and wish they would have, over the years."

Procrastination also is a factor, and for a generation that always has defined itself first and foremost by its youth, a simple denial of aging surely hasn't helped.

"Most people don't even really get serious about saving for retirement until age 40," Salway says. "Then, all of a sudden, you really are in midlife: I was 45, then all of a sudden I was 50. Where did those years go?

"The good news is, realistically, most people's highest income-earning years are in their 40s and 50s," Salway adds. "And, at that time and place, they usually do get serious and do start putting money into (retirement) plans.

"But, if you're 55 or 57 and haven't started a retirement plan, you'd better plan on working until at least 75. You've waited too long, and it's not gonna happen in five years."

As a generation, boomers also might have held a different attitude than their parents about saving and spending money. To put it bluntly: Moms and dads placed a premium on saving and thrift, and boomers haven't.

"One of the things I find interesting is what our parents thought of as necessities versus what our generation thinks of as necessities," says Steve Budin, a certified financial planner with The Budin Group. "Is high-speed Internet access in the house a necessity? Is a cell phone a necessity? Is cable (TV) a necessity?"

"I think they had a different philosophy," boomer Natalie Ahlstrom agrees. "They were frugal. They didn't spend on a lot of the material things I think our generation was more able to do and probably does to too much of an extreme."

Natalie Ahlstrom also recalls that her parents paid cash for everything. "They never had credit. The only thing they had credit on was their house, and they paid that off prior to my even being born. So they were focused on not owing anybody anything."

At 65, Judy Anderson is, technically speaking, just outside the boomer demographic. But hers is the face of what many boomers' retirements might look like.

Anderson, a former customer service manager for an Oregon manufacturing firm, retired at 55, mostly, she says, "because I planned well."

"I came out here thinking I would retire," she continues. "But I got bored so, of course, I took a job, but I didn't really like that. So, I'm a career volunteer."

Anderson regularly volunteers for AARP Nevada and as a trauma intervention volunteer. While she continues working because she wants to, not everybody she knows is as fortunate.

"Some of my friends who have already retired and started to enjoy retirement are now thinking, 'I need to get back to work' " Anderson says, primarily because rising prices for just about everything have made them fear they're going to outlast their retirement savings.

And, on the other side of the gold watch divide, Anderson knows of older workers who have postponed retirement completely. "You may have thought five years ago what your retirement date was going to be," she says. "But it's changed. It's totally changed."

That's not necessarily bad. The idea of "retirement" is "a lot different now than it was when our parents retired," Budin says.

"The reality is retirement was never intended to be what we think it is. Back in the old days, people retired because they were a year away from death. People are living longer and now have the ability to travel and do things they may not have been able to do while they were working."

Retirement today is "not sitting on the porch reading the paper all day," Budin says. "It's reading the paper in the morning and going to play golf in the afternoon, or going to do volunteer work, or going to work part time at a profession."

Salway sees many retirees who "do not go back full time, but they are getting jobs just because they want to have a little extra cash. They make enough money from their retirement plans to cover their nut, but they enjoy that dinner out once in a while."

However it all shakes out, contemplating an ever-approaching retirement is enough to make a boomer finally begin to take seriously mom and dad's frugal ways.

"For sure," Natalie Ahlstrom says. "It's a matter of, 'OK, I need to rethink where I'm putting my money or what I'm spending my money on, because I do only have 10 or 15 years.' "

It's probably no different, she suspects, than "when a financial planner is trying to tell a 20- or 30-year-old, 'You should put this aside every week, blah, blah, blah,' and hopes they'll listen.

"When we get here at 40 or 50," Natalie Ahlstrom says, "we're saying, 'Oh, we didn't listen, either.' "

Contact reporter John Przybys at jprzybys@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0280.

Share & Save

Leave Your Comment	30 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Please enter your name Name: Please enter your email Email: Please enter a comment COMMENTS : (word count limit is 300) You have reached the maximum number of words allowed Current Word Count: Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background. Vegas Business Operator wrote on September 25, 2008 12:06 PM: And when Barack Hussein Obama takes office you can bet this economy will melt away. If he's elected I will close my business in December. 12 great employees out of work and their families without health care. Under Hussein's tax plan I will be branded as a "rich person" because I choose to be productive (not a welfare rat!) and in business. My actual net take home pay is about equal to a firefighter or a cop, and I'll be "rich?" Obama is a confused elitist hater! I'll close in December while I can on my terms, before Hussein's "Nanny State" starts to unfold! NObama! Vote McCain! McCain has the balls to call "BS" when needed, he's not a pandering south-Chicago slum lord's debt collector! I'll take McCain (Proven Honor, Tested by Time, a Lifetime of Service!). Hussein only has 143 actual logged days of Senate service. OOPS! 144, since his daddy had to call him back to Washington today to actually do his job!!!!!! McCain/Palin!!!!!!!!!!! Its the only choice to save the ecomony and keep us safe from the murdering terrorists that Hussein refuses to even acknowledge! Ron Danes wrote on September 24, 2008 08:23 PM: McCain tried to pull a fast one on the public with his ploy to suspend the campaign because he knows he will be exposed at the debate. I was watching Sarah Palin being interviewed on the news earlier today, and boy, was she lost. It was like a deer caught in the headlight. No wonder the McCain campaign tries so hard to shield her from questions that required a bit more reasoning and knowledge than just reading from a teleprompter. This woman, ladies and gentlements, is a mere heartbeat away from becoming president of the U.S. and considering McCain age, the possibility is scary. McCain botched his running mate selection but he can't just dump her now. That would look really bad on his decision-making process, so we the public are stuck with someone that any reasonable person would say is not qualified for any leadership position. She was beyond clueless. By the way, I just checked my Tivo, the interview was with Katie Couric. Just watch the interview and see if you can stop cringing at the thought that she could be president. Don Osborne wrote on September 24, 2008 04:33 PM: With all the problems regarding the economy: I notice that Obama who hasn't been present in the Senate much this or last year is more interested in shooting his mouth off rather than being in Washington D.C. with McCain and the others. I also notice that this Congress has the lowest rating of any and yet they were going to straighten everything out within days of coming to power---7+ YEARS AGO!!! And what a mouth! Harry(stinky pinky) Reid. What a sick joke all these politicians are. Rob L wrote on September 23, 2008 10:51 AM: Hmm, no one mentions France's double digit unemployment rate, a tax rate of upwards of 75%, virtually no GDP growth or the rash of racial violence caused by segregation that would make Alabama blush. If you are willing to take those "luxuries" for "free" healthcare then feel free to book one ofthe many flights that head for Paris each day. I would rather control my own destiny, plan for my own future and handle my own healthcare. I love how the "45 million Americans dont have health insurance" fact gets tossed about by those on the left. Why hasnt the rest of the world done the math and realize that 260 million do have health insurance and are pretty damn happy with it. So once again as is always the case with the democrats, lets screw the productive 85% to cuddle the non-productive 15%. steve wrote on September 23, 2008 09:45 AM: I'm 38 and single. I had a really good job in Las Vegas and I got laid off. I'm moving back to St. Louis to live with my parents and try to find work there. It is horrible to have to do that, but I know I'll be better at the other end of this economy. As your President wrote on September 23, 2008 09:32 AM: I will: 1. Limit welfare to truly disabled, saving billions of dollars. 2. Limit sec. 8 to apartments and for 1 year, saving billions of dollars. 3. Repeal the Community Reinvestment Act, saving billions of dollars. 4. Ban the Congressional Black Caucus 5. Ban Affirmative Action (anti-white) Programs 6. Deport illegal aliens, saving billions of dollars. 7. Require parents to pay $500-1,000/yr for child's education to help relieve taxpayers. 8. Give annual reparation checks to White Men (born after 1950). I will not bailout the losers, even if that restricts the losers from lending and issuing credit. Americans need to save (for retirement) and not be a "debtor nation", but saving/smart Americans scares Wall Street who wants Joe America to be Joe Debtor. BAJAJJO wrote on September 23, 2008 07:06 AM: WE CAN READ BOOKS, GO TO SEMINARS UNTIL YOUR SICK OF IT ALL. BUT IN MOST CASES, IT ALL COMES DOWN TO COMMON SENSE WHEN IT COMES TO PLANNING AND IMPLAMENTING YOUR OWN RETIRMENT FUTURE. SPEND IT ALL ON "THINGS" AND IN MOST CASES WHEN THOSE "THINGS" WEAR OUT YOUR LEFT WITH A MINIMUM OF SELF FINANCIAL PROTECTION. Hank Paulson wrote on September 23, 2008 03:14 AM: BOOMERS... LOL stoned hippies turned bloated greed monsters... truly Americas worst generation lolo wrote on September 22, 2008 12:37 PM: How typical. Find someone to blame. Point fingers at politicians. Shame on us. Sure there are some incidents beyond our control. However, in the end we have to rely on good old fashioned values to survive through the hard times. Arm yourself with knowledge instead of barking like wounded dogs. This article doesn't speak for everyone. Farth wrote on September 22, 2008 12:33 PM: Eight years of Bush/Cheney, more like Cheney/Bush, two years of Gibbons and what kind of a country and state do we have now? We went from the richest country to one with the most debt. Our annual deficit is running at about $500 billion a year. Nevada's unemployment rate is a 25-year high. It's time to make Cheney/Bush accountable, kick Gibbons and his buddy, Porter out of office so Nevada can get back on track again. Read All Comments