Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Neon


SHOW REVIEW: 'X Burlesque'

Baring It All: Gimmick-free 'X Burlesque' doing just fine




You'd think a topless show would be the safest bet on the Las Vegas Strip.

But even with a head start -- four years of operating in different places with various titles -- "X Burlesque" has found it's not easy being the fifth or sixth of anything. Not even when you're selling bare bodies, one of the city's most valued commodities.


Most Popular Stories
  • MEDIAOLOGY: Channel 8 crosses privacy line with Fredericks story
  • Chart House opening at Golden Nugget
  • SHOW REVIEW: Frank Caliendo
  • MIKE WEATHERFORD: Union bashes Newton on Web
  • INTERVIEWS: David Copperfield
  • Gift of Lights adds sparkle to holidays
  • PLAYER'S EDGE: Stations, Fiestas giving reel players cash bonuses every minute
  • UP IN THE AIR: Jets ready to roar at Nellis air show
  • RESTAURANT REVIEW: Origin India
  • THEATER CHAT: Curtain call insulting to gays




  • When the revue moved into the Flamingo Las Vegas early last year, it had to fight for attention. "Crazy Girls" has longevity. "Bite" has a gimmick (vampire babes!). "Crazy Horse Paris" has European prestige. "Fantasy" has live singing and (gasp!) a dude or two to enhance the couples appeal.

    Perhaps understandably, "X Burlesque" seemed as though it was working too hard to be hip and edgy. But producers Angela and Matt Stabile kept tinkering and reworking their revue as it turned the corner on its first year in February.

    The Flamingo got behind the show with a two-year extension and promotional branding in the outlying casino area. "X" is now the one topless revue you can see seriously late at night: midnight, three times per week. And it's no longer the newest kid on the block, thanks to "Ooh La La" at nearby Paris Las Vegas (which seized the title "X" once had for best sense of humor).

    "X" still doesn't have that easy way of explaining where it fits. But that's a challenge for the marketing folks, not one that burdens audiences once they're in the room. Angela Stabile may sum it up best when she says the goal is to be "super sexy but also really fun at the same time."

    I don't know if "credible" is too serious a word for a topless show, but it's easier to praise "X" for what it's not: seedy, derivative or overly silly.

    The changes all have been for the better. A burlesque-looking curtain now covers the stage's roommate set for The Second City comedy troupe, but still creates a screen for video projections. New choreography is by Enrique Lugo, who did some audacious work for the departed "Fashionistas," and here keeps the seven women moving with rock 'n' roll athleticism that doesn't sacrifice the provocative for artsy indulgence (the same cannot always be said of the projected graphics).

    And it's awkward to say it, but new comedian Nancy Ryan fits the show better than the late, great Pudgy. The comedian born Beverly Wines, who died in December, did more of an act than conventional stand-up. She gave "X" a retro-camp flair which justified the "Burlesque" in the title, but was out of place with the rest.

    Ryan is a better blend with the rest of the show's contemporary thrust, while doing the same job of evening the score for the women attending with their menfolk. She's good at crowd banter, heckling a father-son team with New Jersey sass and telling the son, "Your house is blocking the driveway. You better move it" when he bolts for a restroom retreat.

    The things that haven't changed are most of what made the original "X" stand out when it debuted at the Aladdin in 2002. The women keep their own hairstyles and individuality, and each is featured in a solo number. The music is fresh, and most pieces don't bother you with the entire song. A girls 'n' guns tribute to the military without corny music? It boggles the mind.

    A couple of numbers now qualify as classics: a bathtub seduction paced by stage blackouts and a piece where you see only three pairs of legs and not the rest of their owners.

    "X Burlesque" doesn't reinvent the wheel, or even the girlie show. But for a show without a gimmick, it's doing just fine.

    Contact reporter Mike Weatherford at mweatherford@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0288.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    LANE wrote on June 10, 2009 03:28 PM: SAW X-BURLESQUE AT THE END OF MAY. HAD TO BE THE WORST TOPLESS SHOW I HAVE EVER EXPERIENCED IN THE 10 YEARS I HAVE GONE TO VEGAS. MUSIC LOUD TO AN EXTREME. COMEDIAN WAS TERIBLE AND THE GIRLS, ALTHOUG FULL OF ENERGY, WERE NOTHING TO LOOK AT.


    Angela Stabile wrote on July 10, 2008 07:54 AM: Wayne should actually see the new show before making a comment like this. He hasn't. I'm surprised at such unprofessional behavior from a veteran in show business. The girl Wayne is dating is no longer in the show.


    WAYNE BRADY wrote on May 30, 2008 02:26 PM: This show sucks!!!