Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

Neon


MEDIAOLOGY: TV newscasts bribing viewers to boost ratings

Gasoline is the new sex. Sweeps-wise, that is.

That hallowed quarterly ritual -- in which ratings are measured and ad rates reset -- was once synonymous with the nastier side of The Nasty. Strippers, streetwalkers, sleazy clubs and pimp interviews -- their faces shrouded in shadows -- overran November newscasts.


Most Popular Stories
  • MEDIAOLOGY: Channel 8 crosses privacy line with Fredericks story
  • Chart House opening at Golden Nugget
  • SHOW REVIEW: Frank Caliendo
  • INTERVIEWS: David Copperfield
  • MIKE WEATHERFORD: Union bashes Newton on Web
  • Gift of Lights adds sparkle to holidays
  • PLAYER'S EDGE: Stations, Fiestas giving reel players cash bonuses every minute
  • RESTAURANT REVIEW: Origin India
  • MOVIE REVIEW: "The Blind Side"
  • THEATER CHAT: Curtain call insulting to gays




  • Sex is still semisexy to sweeps. Stations didn't suddenly go celibate and snap a chastity belt on those stories. But they aren't such potent viewer aphrodisiacs anymore to sex-soaked Sin City in porn-addled America.

    And when the economy goes flaccid, what's sexier than sex is ... fuel? If gasoline is erotic, KTNV-TV, Channel 13 is Angelina Jolie. Nude. In a Hustler video.

    A recent 6 a.m. newscast on Channel 13 exemplified the excessiveness, devoting more than nine minutes over seven segments and several teasers to gushy, giddy coverage revealing the Fabulous Freddy's station to which viewers could flock for their free-gasoline giveaway. Channel 13's Amanda Sanchez, flanked by Melanie and Michael of KSNE-FM 106.5, was forced to shill about all the fab fun and frivolity at Freddy's. Chopper dude Paul Hollenbeck even hovered overhead for an aerial view of the balloon-festooned site.

    Holy bribery, Batman! An over-the-top reminder of how watch-to-win means bribe-to-watch.

    Promotions and contests are embedded in the TV news playbook nationwide, as well as in other media, including newspapers. KVBC-TV, Channel 3's "Give & Win" is quasi-altruism, shelling out $500 to viewers, another $500 to their chosen charities. KVVU-TV, Channel 5's "Fox-5 Rewards" showers viewers with merchandise and trips. Over the years, stations elsewhere have shamelessly abused the concept with giveaways climaxing at $1.5 million.

    While nowhere near that obscene level, Channel 13's gas-o-rama could still fuel a backlash against their credibility.

    Morning newscasts are loosey-goosier than later broadcasts, but this tipped over toward radio's business model of making love to sponsors. (C'mon down, we're broadcasting live from whatever business coughs up our ad rates!) Still, most radio is not tethered to journalistic concerns. Channel 13 created its own (non)news, then covered it with embarrassing enthusiasm. In sophisticated markets -- what we might aspire to be -- that's known as unsophisticated. With stations so awash in cacophonous talk/reality twaddle every day, news is a protected corner of credibility. Or should be.

    What's the long-term upside? Temporary, artificial ratings bumps are built on fake appeal. Viewers lured by free goodies rather than good journalism probably will skedaddle once swag shrivels up, rather than cement an allegiance to a station's real purpose of newsgathering.

    But by then, so what? Sweeps are done, ratings are up, advertisers are set. It's enough to give guardians of journalism a bad case of gas.

    Contact reporter Steve Bornfeld at sborn feld@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0256.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Steve wrote on November 20, 2008 08:38 AM: Try not conveniently ignoring the point of the column. It says newspapers are among media that have contests and of course they have ads. What papers don't do is write big stories covering, and flacking, their own contests, inappropriately letting promotions drive segments of editorial, which is what 13 did. It's about the separation between promotion and editorial. You might want to respond to what the column actually did say.


    Bill wrote on November 20, 2008 07:19 AM: Very good, Steve, and I wouldn't be able to enter the paper's contests nowadays anyway. The web pages are so crammed with flashing ads they crash my browser.


    Steve wrote on November 20, 2008 03:31 AM: ...because the newspapers NEVER have contests...