Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Neon


MEDIAOLOGY: Line between television ads, news blurs

Why, thy Lord of Holy TV Ad Revenue?

You visit upon us the plague of commercials as we wander the vast desert of television. A more merciful deity creates DVRs to smite such pestilence with a mighty finger on the fast-forward button. Why, then, must you countersmite us by delivering this evil unto the Promised Land of Regularly Scheduled Programming?


Most Popular Stories
  • MEDIAOLOGY: Channel 8 crosses privacy line with Fredericks story
  • Chart House opening at Golden Nugget
  • SHOW REVIEW: Frank Caliendo
  • MIKE WEATHERFORD: Union bashes Newton on Web
  • INTERVIEWS: David Copperfield
  • Gift of Lights adds sparkle to holidays
  • PLAYER'S EDGE: Stations, Fiestas giving reel players cash bonuses every minute
  • RESTAURANT REVIEW: Origin India
  • THEATER CHAT: Curtain call insulting to gays
  • MOVIE REVIEW: "The Blind Side"




  • Money, doofus.

    Since its 2006 debut, the "More" morning show on KVVU-TV, Channel 5, with its fluffy souffle of entertainment/food/fashion fodder, has used euphemistically titled "integrated content": ads dressed as program segments -- produced by Fox-5 -- presented within the context of lifestyle news. Despite labeling as advertiser-sponsored in a screen graphic, its production polish purposely lends it a feature-news feel, and its presence on "More," rather than as a stand-alone ad or infomercial, validates that.

    Consumerism masked as journalism.

    Example: A recent spot celebrating how Clear Choice Dental implants rescued Tony Curtis' celebrity chompers. "Entertainment Tonight"-type touches included clips of "The Defiant Ones" and young-stud footage of Curtis, with newsy narration by Fox-5's Claudine Grant and a current Curtis interview. That's after a Clear Choice ad aired during a standard commercial break.

    "It's growing in frequency," Fox-5 news director Adam P. Bradshaw says about the practice nationwide. "We've kept it down to a certain number per week. Some weeks we may have three, some only one."

    As the economy hurtles down a gully -- 2009 industry predictions are for a 15 percent nose dive in local TV advertising -- Fox is particularly partial toward paid programming and promotions. Some stations drop them in during nonpeak hours, but Fox-5 also forks over a 1-to-2 p.m. chunk in the guts of its daytime lineup. Last summer's appearance of McDonald's iced-coffee cups on the pre-"More" morning show presaged last month's move as Fox became the first major network to regularly program long-form infomercials, replacing Saturday morning kids' fare with "Weekend Marketplace."

    Bradshaw notes that "integrated content" never appears on straight newscasts and differentiates between Grant as an entertainment correspondent and hard news reporters.

    Journalistically justified? No -- even on a show with stories that dissolve faster than cotton candy in an 8-year-old's mouth. Celeb silliness doesn't pack the serious wallop of crime, accidents and politics, but it's still regarded as news (especially in the TMZ era) rather than blatant product hustles, and subject to traditional reporting standards. Stripped of a label that muddies its meaning, "integrated content" is simply advertising cloaked in a pretense of news.

    That smudges the line between story and sales pitch for viewers, and breaches the journalism equivalent of separation of church and state.

    Even if, journalistically, "More" is less a state than a post-office box.

    Contact reporter Steve Bornfeld at sbornfeld@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0256.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Brian wrote on February 12, 2009 09:53 PM: Every morning show in the country does it -- it's just a matter of whether they tell you or you figure it out yourself.


    Steve wrote on February 12, 2009 05:28 AM: hey Ned...I'd rather be loud and #1 than quiet, boring, bad and number 2, 3, or 4.


    Ned wrote on February 12, 2009 05:11 AM: KVVU doesn't offer news or journalism. What it offers is an embarrassing mess of loud people who behave as if they can not read or write. The station doesn't even know it's own address. "Local. Las Vegas." The station is in Henderson. Do they know the difference between the two cities? Or, are they lying? What do they have against us people who live in Henderson? I like Henderson.


    Mike wrote on February 12, 2009 04:42 AM: Good observations, Steve...Even this is not as annoying as the local network affiliates wasting newscast time doing "stories" about what's on Survivor or Dancing With the Stars.