Amazed wrote on September 22, 2008 11:42 PM: Wow, Ticketfixer, Ticketbuster, and Abadcherry...it's very obvious you are a friend of Halverson. You call Ileen a fat troll?? She's a supermodel compared to Halverson. Helping family and friends with tickets is hardly something new in any courthouse. It sounds like nitpicking to me. Just another one of the ill-equipped Halverson's ploys for a power trip. She knew she didn't have what it takes to be a judge and had to find other ways to feel in control. How's the head, by the way?? Hahahaha!!!!

Ticketfixer UPD wrote on August 21, 2008 08:19 PM: Las Vegas Review Journal August 8, 2008

"When the ticket issue surfaced last year, court officials reviewed Spoor's e-mail but found no evidence of illegal activity.
Michael Sommermeyer, spokesman for the District Court, said Thursday that judicial executive assistants are allowed to refer individuals to lawyers for legal advice. Spoor's activity would fall under this category, he said.

When asked why tickets would be sent to a district judge, he said the judges are elected officials who sometimes receive tickets from their constituents.

He said that the public is free to send traffic tickets to judges at District Court but that it's up to the judge and staff whether they want to refer it to an attorney.

He said the practice was similar to Ticket Busters, the local legal service that advertises that it takes care of tickets."

PLEASE SEND YOUR TICKETS YOU WOULD LIKE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY FREE OF CHARGE TO EMAIL ADDRESS spoori@co.clark.nv.us or FAX: 702 671- 4606 Attention : Ileen Spoor.

Ileen's Phone and Fax #

Fax: 702-671-4606

This is Ileen Spoor's REAL work contact information

She will be glad to help you reduce your ticket bail amount, Change moving violations to a traffic citation all without leaving your homes/Offices. Free of Charge.

You can also send your requests for Jury Duty dismissal directly to Ileen. No reason for dismissal required.

Please include your phone number should Ileen have to contact you. Thank you.

ticketfixer wrote on August 21, 2008 01:17 AM: Las Vegas Review Journal August 8, 2008

"When the ticket issue surfaced last year, court officials reviewed Spoor's e-mail but found no evidence of illegal activity.
Michael Sommermeyer, spokesman for the District Court, said Thursday that judicial executive assistants are allowed to refer individuals to lawyers for legal advice. Spoor's activity would fall under this category, he said.

When asked why tickets would be sent to a district judge, he said the judges are elected officials who sometimes receive tickets from their constituents.

He said that the public is free to send traffic tickets to judges at District Court but that it's up to the judge and staff whether they want to refer it to an attorney.

He said the practice was similar to Ticket Busters, the local legal service that advertises that it takes care of tickets."

PLEASE SEND YOUR TICKETS YOU WOULD LIKE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY FREE OF CHARGE TO EMAIL ADDRESS:

spoori@co.clark.nv.us

PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR CITATION #, NAME & ADDRESS, DATE OF CITATION AND PHONE NUMBER OF WHERE YOU CAN BE CONTACTED.

This is Ileen Spoor REAL Email Address. She will be glad to help you reduce your ticket bail amount,Change moving violations to a traffic citation and dismiss Jury Duty if you are to busy to go or simply do not feel like it.

IleenTicketBuster wrote on August 21, 2008 12:16 AM: ATTENTION: Las Vegas Residents and Anyone who has received a Ticket in Clark County.

Clark County Court Administration has stated that it is perfectly acceptable for Ileen Spoor to take moving violation and traffic tickets from the public and refer them to local Attorney's free of charge. These Attorney's will get a reduction in your Ticket fees, and will get moving violations reduced to Parking Citations.
They will also get the ticket amount reduced.

This will be all at no fee if you go through Ileen Spoor, JEA at the Regional Justice Center.

Please feel free to Email Ileen with your traffic Citation information at:

SPOORI@Co.Clark.NV.US

Please include your Citation number, date of Citation and your phone number so Ileen may contact you to obtain a copy of your ticket.

This is Ileen's REAL Email address.
She has been running this Ticket busting Service at the RJC for 8 years and Clark County is aware and states this is open to anyone in the public sector.

I will be using this service. I suggest you do as well. No more taking time off work. No more having to hire and pay for your own attorney.

She will also handle dismissing Jury Duty if you do not feel up to doing it, or you are just to busy.

Your welcome for the Email.

AbadCherry wrote on August 11, 2008 09:35 AM: Attorney's Role is to Clarify or Confuse wrote on August 08, 2008 10:12 PM:
By attempting to make Spoor "the issue," do you think Halverson's attorney is attempting to clarify or confuse?


I think the Attorney is trying to show Ileen Spoor for the FAT LYING little troll she is. I don't think he tried to make Spoor the issue at all. I think he was trying to show there is much more to this story than meets the eye of first glance.

Clearly the Attorney had some sort of documents that prove Spoor is a liar and the "Commission" would not allow him to read them or make Spoor answer questions about it.

I found it telling that when they wanted Halverson to answer questions they would say, "This is not a "real" trial so, this or that would not apply.

Yet, when Schwartz wanted to have Fatty Spoor have to answer questions regarding these tickets, he was told he could not per some court NRS something or other...

Again, to levels of justice.. one if you are massively obese and unlikable.
Another if you are just obese and are being backed by the Chief Jugde and Court Administration.

One has to wonder WHY all the hush, hush about these tickets..

WAIT... MAYBE... they want to keep our Supreme Court Judge Mikey Cherry out of it.. since Spoor said he was aware and approved her running her free "Ticket Buster" organinzation on County time. Ya think?? One also has to wonder why these Attorney's did all this legal work for free?? You don't think it's cause " BIG" ole Justice Cherry's (another Fatty) name was on the letterhead???

Way to go Justice Cherry.... Hey, got any extra Superbowl tickets??

endrun wrote on August 09, 2008 02:59 PM: 'My issue would be that the discipline should be consistent and not politically driven.'

Such could be said about sentencing and the indigent defense issue.

There is a whole other can of worms going on with that which interestingly enough dovetail with other 'color of law' and public corruption matters.

There is a lot of stuff starting to surface as a result of efforts from many directions.

Its interesting how these officials (Supremes, JDC et al) seem to snap to attention when investigations are going on. The problem is, is that it is so obvious its pathetic.

endrun wrote on August 09, 2008 02:48 PM: 'My issue would be that the discipline should be consistent and not politically driven.'

Such could be said about sentencing and the indigent defense issue.

There is a whole other can of worms going on with that which interestingly enough dovetail with other 'color of law' and public corruption matters.

There is a lot of stuff starting to surface as a result of efforts from many directions.

Its interesting how these officials (Supremes, JDC et al) seem to snap to attention when investigations are going on. The problem is, is that is so obvious its pathetic.

tmosley wrote on August 09, 2008 12:29 PM: Endrun; I might be able to add some facts to the posting by "Interesting".

Mosley filed similar actions necessary to continue (delay) and challenge the action by the JDC. Different Outcome. He managed to delay for three years. One delay was caused by his insistence that the members of the commission were biased against him, resulting in a new "Mosley Commission" being formed.

Ultimately the Supreme Court upheld the JDC discipline ($5000 fine and an ethics class). Mosley then sued the JDC, individually and Terry Mosley on a RICO action. (resulting in enormous legal fees. His complaint accuses the JDC and Terry Mosley of conspiracy, despite the fact that she ironically learned of the "fixed" custody hearing a year too late from the RJ news story.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/aug/06/fishing-ralston/#comments

The 17 ethics violations were far more serious and the complaint filed by the director of the JDC, Leonard Gang (not an angry woman), when he learned of the Metro Investigation. .

Dominic Gentile represented Mosley for free, yet quit on Halverson allegedly because she could no longer pay him, and later by Galatz and Pitaro.

The Chief Judge never removed Mosley even though he admitted to speaking ex-parte with a felon assigned to his court without the presence of the DA. He was allowed to stay in office for the next three years, get through another election, and continue to use his position under color of law, in order to further his own agenda with his RICO action as well as the custody case.

I presume the point is that despite the many similarities with these two judicial complaints, there is or may be a disparity of justice.

My issue would be that the discipline should be consistent and not politically driven.

endrun wrote on August 09, 2008 11:03 AM: Interesting,

We know that The Commission is bogus, but the is there a point to your post?

What was the outcome of a ruling from Nevada Supreme Court on this?

Im trying to complete the circle, but it doesnt go anywhere.

Interesting wrote on August 09, 2008 07:06 AM: State panel won'tt drop complaint against judge
Tue, Aug 15, 2000 (11:06 a.m.)
The state Commission on Judicial Discipline has refused to drop judicial misconduct charges against District Judge Donald Mosley.
The seven-member commission delayed a scheduled Monday hearing on the allegations until Mosley's attorney can appeal to the state Supreme Court after a federal judge interceded.
Mosley is accused in a commission complaint filed in March of violating the Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct on 11 occasions, including helping a friend by dismissing charges against a criminal defendant, improperly using court stationery for personal business and discussing personal business with a defendant awaiting sentencing in his court.
Mosley has denied his actions were improper.
During argument for dismissal Monday, Mosley's attorney Neil Galatz compared the proceedings against Mosley to the trial that led to Christ's crucifixion and referred to "The Federalist Papers" in challenging the legitimacy of the commission.
Besides referring to the commission as an illegitimate board that violates due process and its own rules, Galatz asserted that the commission is illegally constituted and that the case against Mosley was improperly prepared.
The commission's special prosecutor, Mary Boetsch, said there is no evidence that Mosley's due process rights were violated.
Though the panel was scheduled to begin hearings on the allegations, a federal judge had ordered the commission on Thursday to hold "a full and meaningful hearing" on the motion to dismiss the charges.
In his decision, U.S. District Court Judge Justin Quackenbush said Galatz "raised serious questions as to the impartiality of the Nevada Judicial Commission as now constituted ." He ordered hearings on the claims against Mosley delayed until the Nevada Supreme Court can rule, if it is willing, on the dismissal motion

Read All Comments