Comments (2) | Add a comment
10 Questions allows voter, candidate interaction
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Aug. 6, 2010 | 2:42 p.m.
Political candidates have a history of answering people waving microphones or fat contribution checks first and everyone else last.
Now everyday Nevadans have a new way to get the attention of candidates seeking the top political offices.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Personal Democracy Forum, in association with Google and YouTube, are providing a new tool that will let people ask their own questions and give candidates time and space to provide in-depth answers.
The project, with funding by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, is an online forum called 10 Questions. It collects questions via the Internet, lets people vote to determine which questions they most want answered, and encourages candidates to respond.
"We have a culture that glorifies sound bites over substance, and we are trying to get beyond it," said Daniel Teweles, 10 Questions project leader for the Personal Democracy Forum.
The project covers campaigns in 11 states, with the Nevada version posted at www.lvrj.com/politics/10questions/html and covering races for U.S. Senate, governor and the Third Congressional District.
People have until Sept. 14 to post questions, either by writing them or uploading video. During that time, readers and viewers can vote on the questions they most want candidates to answer.
On Sept. 15 the top 10 questions will be posted. Candidates will have until Oct. 15 to respond on the site.
Review-Journal Editor Thomas Mitchell said the 10 Questions forum is a chance for readers and candidates to delve more deeply into the issues than newspaper, television and radio coverage can accommodate.
"We're putting on our website more political information than ever before," Mitchell said. "Electrons are virtually free, newsprint is not."
Tonya Carpenter, director of new media development for the Review-Journal, said the newspaper website is a good place to link to the forum because it receives heavy traffic from people interested in politics and campaigns.
The website, Carpenter said, receives more than 10 million page views per month from approximately 2 million unique visitors.
"Our partnership with 10 Questions provides us an opportunity to allow our readers to interact directly with the candidates who seek to represent them," Carpenter said. "We value openness and access, and this affords us yet another avenue to achieve that goal."
Currently 10 Questions includes spots to post questions to the Democratic and Republican candidates in the top three Nevada races, but Teweles said minor party candidates in those races could be added.
"The end goal is really to provide for a more robust democracy," Teweles said. "If it is someone who has a real stake in the election and is making a go of it, we will absolutely feature them."
During the 2008 election cycle, Personal Democracy Forum entered into partnerships with The New York Times editorial board and MSNBC, ventures generating nearly 150,000 votes on videos with questions for presidential candidates.
Media partners for the 2010 incarnation include the San Francisco Chronicle, the Miami Herald and Politico.
Stephen Bates, a professor of journalism at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said 10 Questions forums are a chance for people who want more than they can learn from the daily news but in a format that isn't controlled by a campaign.
"The press seems to be kind of consumed by horse race journalism and scandals," Bates said. "Anything that gets more issue information out there is terrific."
Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Latinos don't want to be living on an entitlement check the rest of their lives. They want to get "ahead" in life and it can not be done on a welfare or unemployment check Harry. Your "Progressive" agenda sounds good to people but in the end, they are slaves to the state/government. You are a fool!
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-how-could-any-hispanics-vote-gop
My comment concerns the "Making Homes Affordable program" by the President and Congress. As you know it was designed to help homeowners that are upside down in their loans. Well, No One has checked up on the banks that are making and redoing these loans, i.e., Chase, Bank of America and many more. In my case they lowered my payment from $1,520.00 to $845.00 at the last change. Then when the loan was done they raised the payment to $1,275.00. This is a savings true, but they took my loan amount from $210,000.00 to $225,000.00. I believe under the program that they were to forgive the interest and penalties. Well, my house is currently only worth about $135,000.00 max. No one in congress or any of our government agencies are checking on these banks that are suposed to be doing good for the general public that helped bail them out. I also wonder what happened to the $6,500.00 that they got for redoing these loans, because I cannot find out anywhere that it was used on my loan. Are these "Fat Cat" bankers ripping off the general public and the government two and three time for the same thing. They may be padding their balance sheets and lining their pockets at the expense of us all, the public and the government. They are some of the same ones that got us into this mess and had to be bailed out by the government and the general public at large. If they are lining their pockets, then they need to be held responsible. Return the money to the homeonwers and the government with the same type of penalties and interest to both that they applied to us all. They should not take us twice for their errors in judgement.