Rogers, county officials defy Gibbons on budget cut lists - News

PRINT THIS Popular

Oct. 30, 2007
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Rogers, county officials defy Gibbons on budget cut lists

By ED VOGEL
REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU

CARSON CITY -- University system Chancellor Jim Rogers and Clark County government officials snubbed Gov. Jim Gibbons on Monday as they refused to submit lists showing where they would cut their budgets.

Rogers followed through on his pledge not to send the administration a list showing how he would reduce spending for the Nevada System of Higher Education, which is funded by the state, by $64 million.

Most Popular Stories

NORM: When live news shots turn bad

NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage

NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act

NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms

Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair

NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area

Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'

Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back

LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June

Official: Fatal gunshot in back

And the county did not prepare a list of how it would cut spending on child welfare and juvenile justice, which is partially funded by the state, by $3.6 million.

Gibbons asked selected state agencies three weeks ago to prepare priority lists on how they would trim their budgets by 5 percent, or a combined $184 million, if asked to do so because of lower than anticipated tax revenues.

Agencies faced a 5 p.m. deadline Monday to send the information to the governor.

Clark County was asked by state Health and Human Services Director Mike Willden to trim its spending.

Gibbons told Willden to prepare a plan to reduce total Health and Human Services spending by $80 million. That was the largest cut request made by the governor.

A spokesman for Health and Human Services declined Monday to release a copy of its cut list.

Gibbons spent Monday touring military bases in California with state Homeland Security Chief Rick Eaton, and could not be reached for comment.

Melissa Subbotin, Gibbons' press secretary, emphasized that the governor is only considering possible cuts at this time, but that he expected all agencies to prepare the cut lists.

If an agency doesn't, then the administration will have no choice but to make the cuts itself, she said.

"We will evaluate the university system budget," she said. "We will look at the funding increases they received last session and proceed with what reductions may be necessary. We are all in this together and we should work together."

A law passed in June requires the Board of Regents, which oversees the university system, to obey any financial directives made by the governor, but there is no penalty for ignoring such requests.

Rogers said he recognizes the governor has the power to reduce the system's budget as he sees fit.

"I can't stop them from doing that," he said. "But I am not going to be a part to shutting this system down in any way."

A legislative source said the administration could force Rogers to make cuts by simply reducing the amount of the checks it prepares to cover system expenses. That way, Rogers would have no choice but to cut spending according to his own priorities.

Clark County Commission Chairman Rory Reid echoed Rogers' comments in a letter sent to Gibbons.

"My fear is that any response would imply that such cuts are necessary or acceptable," he said. "While Clark County is more than willing to participate in a dialogue with you and legislative leaders about the future of these programs, we believe strongly that they should be one of the last programs to be cut, rather than the first."

Gov. Kenny Guinn did not receive such resistance to his directives when he cut state spending in 1999 and after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

"That's because he talked to people ahead of time," Rogers said.

Unlike Guinn, Gibbons just made an announcement of what he expected state agencies to cut, the chancellor said. That occurred at a meeting of his Cabinet three weeks ago.

The governor spared public education, the prisons system and public safety agencies from any possible budget cuts.

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, said he considers the university system as important as public education. Raggio also said child welfare and mental health spending should not be cut.

He and Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, both said the economy could rebound and it may be too early to make reductions.

Raggio suggested Gibbons prepare a cut list plan that legislators could consider during their Nov. 14 Interim Finance Committee meeting.

If he needs to reduce state spending, then Gibbons should look at delaying the start of his educational empowerment program and the expansion of full-day kindergarten programs, Raggio said.

Subbotin said the administration will wait several days or longer before deciding where to make state government budget cuts. Officials want to secure additional data to verify whether gaming, sales and other tax revenues continue to drop before making actual budget cuts, she said.

The cuts are under consideration because sales and gaming tax revenue fell nearly $35 million below projections during the first three months of the fiscal year that began July 1.

Most of the decline has been blamed on the slump in the residential home sale market.

Subbotin said budget analysts want to see data on real estate transfer taxes.

"They are probably looking at this as we speak," she said.

Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or (775) 687-3901.

Share & Save

Leave Your Comment	11 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Please enter your name Name: Please enter your email Email: Please enter a comment COMMENTS : (word count limit is 300) You have reached the maximum number of words allowed Current Word Count: Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background. Rodman wrote on October 30, 2007 09:04 PM: UNLVSTUD. As far as having an uneducated work force we got em, they are called illegal mexican immigrants. Bob B. wrote on October 30, 2007 06:53 PM: UNLVStud -- its not a question of the funding or even whether some or all of the electorate agree Rogers and Raggio. It is about the functioning of government, and the authority of petty administrators such as Rogers to at once refuse to do his job and still keep that job. As a part of Roger's job, he is required to respond to the Governor's request for a list of possible spending cuts equaling a 5% reduction of the overall budget -- just a list of potential cuts which are possible if such an overall budget reduction becomes immediately necessary to the welfare of the State of Nevada -- a request which Rogers has absolutely no authority to refuse. Rogers' job is structured such as to remove oversite for the higher education from isolated administrators such as himself, and to prevent such administrators from abusing the office and holding the higer education system hostage to their whim. Rogers should be fired for what he is presently doing, and while you may believe he is justified in doing so because you like his reasons today, UNLVstud, what happens if you do not like it tommorrow? The university system is subordinate to the demands of the executive branch and is to be responsive to our elected officials. Rogers flouts those obligations in order to hold the university system and the entire state hostage to his political views, and does so during a state of economic considerations that may require immediate action by not only the Governor, but the legislature, as well. Rogers potentially endangers the welfare of the state as a whole by preventing such immediate action by refusing to provide the information required of him as a part of his job. Fire him. UNLVStud wrote on October 30, 2007 04:13 PM: Good for Rogers and Raggio for standing up for education in this state. Of course, other people would rather have an uneducated work force rather than joining in with Rogers and Raggio's call to allow the universities to keep the pittance they receive from the state. I'm sure these people that complain about all the money spent on education in this state, and the job Rogers is doing, will need a nurse to take care of them in the future. I'm betting those people will also want a nurse that went to a fully funded, top rate institution, rather than the inverse. Herb wrote on October 30, 2007 03:19 PM: Rogers should be FIRED for refusing to submit the lists. Bill Raggio should switch parties and become a Democrat. He is the ultimate RINO and a traitor to Republican values. DC wrote on October 30, 2007 02:19 PM: If people had any idea how many 6 figure managers work at the Department of Family Services + year end bonus's from $5000 - $20,000 per year it would make your stomach turn consider what a lousy job they do. DaveR wrote on October 30, 2007 01:53 PM: What the hell is Gibbons doing in California visiting their bases for? Checking on how his earmarks are working out? Bob B. wrote on October 30, 2007 12:46 PM: Jim Rogers has no discretion as Chancellor to simply refuse a directive from the Governor, plain and simple. He should be immediately terminated regardless of his elitist political views as he is an administrator. Rogers was a poor choice for the job in the first place and the University of Nevada will continue to suffer under his administration. cas127 wrote on October 30, 2007 12:18 PM: "That's because he talked to people ahead of time," Rogers said Ah, yes - openness in government. Clearly Diamond Jim Rogers prefers the stained, sprung sofa in the back room for his political assignations... cas127 wrote on October 30, 2007 12:14 PM: ""I can't stop them from doing that," he said. "But I am not going to be a part to shutting this system down in any way." Shutting down? A possible cut after how many years of compounded increases? Let's just put Rogers' face on the front of the Luxor (he clearly thinks he is a pharaoh) and invite his arrogant *ss to leave the state. This in the intellect and attitude that earned millions? Clearly political cronyism was really behind Rogers' media empire. patte wrote on October 30, 2007 10:14 AM: To Rogers. Quit!!!!! To Rory Reid. Quit!!!! Your Democrats at work, NOT! Read All Comments