A divided Las Vegas City Council voted to put the kibosh on short-term housing rentals Wednesday, but it's not clear that the ban will prevent homeowners from renting to weekend or weekly visitors or whether that's even what the council wants to stop.
What is clear, however, is that large numbers of people have been renting their homes to visitors in violation of bans in Henderson and Clark County, and existing Las Vegas laws are habitually violated as well.
On a 4-2 vote, the council prohibited rentals of less than 30 days in residential zones.
The measure is aimed at "party houses" that bring the free-for-all, all-night-long debauchery of the Strip into single-family neighborhoods.
But several people told the council Wednesday that the impact will be much broader, bringing down retirement incomes and potentially worsening an already stormy home foreclosure picture.
That's the concern of Councilman Steve Wolfson, who voted against the new ordinance though he originally co-sponsored it.
"The way this bill reads in its proposed fashion is too broad," he said. "We need to narrowly draft this statute so that it targets the people we're after. Why pass a law now and worry about everything else later?"
But Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian said the city needed an enforcement tool against houses that cause chronic problems for neighbors.
"I can understand the pain some of you are feeling right now," she told the ordinance's critics. "I'm not against looking at it further, but I want to have a vote today."
Two areas of city code already applied to short-term rentals, said City Attorney Brad Jerbic.
Rentals of less than 30 days are subject to a 2 percent room tax, and owners of those properties must have a business license to rent them. City staff weren't aware of anyone obtaining the needed license, nor of anyone cited for noncompliance.
"We probably have hundreds or thousands of local property owners ... who are breaking the law," Wolfson said.
"Probably," said Jerbic.
The new ordinance gives the city a more direct way to penalize property owners. It's a "blunt statement" that properties in a residential zone can't be leased for terms of less than 30 days, Jerbic said.
The new law probably won't stop business, said Michele Pombo of Southwest Management Group. Her Web site has three pages of houses in the Las Vegas Valley that are advertised as available for short-term and corporate rentals.
"I'm going to write a lot of 31-day paperwork," she said, noting that she has regular clients who've booked as far ahead as 2009 -- and that none of her tenants has ever warranted police intervention.
Local mortgage broker Robert Turner said people are managing to keep up with their mortgage payments by renting space to visitors.
"What we're talking about here is survival of the fittest," he said. "There's going to be a whole 'nother run of (foreclosures)."
Henderson and Clark County already had short-term rental bans. Enforcement is complaint-based, meaning sites that don't annoy the neighbors usually don't get in trouble.
That flummoxed Councilman Larry Brown, who joined Wolfson in voting against the ordinance.
"This whole industry of the vacation rentals is a part of the market -- an illegal part of the market," Brown said.
"I think the focus of our actions should be a better means of enforcement of the existing code. ... It's hypocritical to sit here and say, 'We know you're doing things illegally, but don't worry.' "
Contact reporter Alan Choate at achoate@ reviewjournal.com or (702) 229-6435.