Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

News


CORRECTION, 11/20/07 -- A front-page graphic in Thursday's Review-Journal inaccurately described the members of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's family who died in a car crash shortly after Biden was first elected to the U.S. Senate from Delaware. Biden's first wife and infant daughter were killed.

DEMOCRATIC DEBATE: POLITICAL LIMELIGHT
























Photo by John Gurzinski.

It's fight night in Las Vegas.

The jabs will fly. The contenders will duck and weave. They hope they land their punches and don't leave with too many bruises.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Phelps galpal gets exposure on Web
  • NORM: Robin Gibb in airport standoff
  • NORM: Web site shows life of Mazzeo
  • NORM: Britney-LV buzz hard to nail down
  • NORM: Wynn coveted cathedral's land
  • DOUG ELFMAN: Comedian says his arrest a joke
  • Las Vegas police use saturation strategy to cool 'hot spots' of crime
  • 2-year-old boy dies in dog attack
  • Fresh-faced trio wows throng of youthful fans at MGM Grand
  • DOUG ELFMAN: Cab, limo drivers take pulse of tourists



  • The action begins at 5 p.m., when the Democratic presidential candidates gather at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, for a nationally televised debate that thrusts Nevada into the political spotlight more than ever before.  

    "The whole world will be watching Vegas Thursday night," said CNN's Wolf Blitzer, the moderator of tonight's debate. The network's reach extends to 240 countries and territories worldwide.

    Tension is in the air as the race for the nomination comes down to the wire.

    The candidates' criticisms of each other have intensified, and their rhetoric has ratcheted up. The millions of political junkies who'll tune in tonight are expecting big drama.

    "It's coming at a critical moment in the run-up to the January contest," said political expert Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. "The candidates are primed to attack, and they need to. If they're ever going to make their case for themselves and against their opponents, it's now."

    Las Vegas is guaranteed to be more than just a backdrop for this national event.

    Blitzer and panel members Campbell Brown and John Roberts, also of CNN, plan to include questions about Western concerns, and in the second hour of the debate, all of the questions will be asked by locals.

    A handpicked pool of about 100 undecided Nevada Democrats will occupy a special section of the audience, where CNN's Suzanne Malveaux will call on them to put their concerns directly to the candidates.

    With hundreds of members of the national and international media descending on Las Vegas for the debate, Nevada's new prominence in the political process also will be on display.

    Nevada Democrats and Republicans are scheduled to have presidential nominating caucuses on Jan. 19, before most other states will have voted. In previous elections, Nevada partisans weighed in too late in the nominating process to have much effect on the results.

    Democrats in particular hope to gain an advantage in the West with the early contest, which they say will give a bigger voice to Hispanics and union members, who aren't well represented in the traditional early states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., argues that winning over Western voters will be the key to the 2008 election.

    "If you want to win the presidency next year, you have to win the West," he said in a conference call this week, pointing out that in addition to the Nevada caucus, the Democratic National Convention will be in Denver in August.

    "Our state will be the first test of (the candidates in) the West, the first test of real diversity," Reid said. "I love Iowa. I love New Hampshire. But Iowa has few people and no diversity. New Hampshire has no people and no diversity. ... We want people coming to the state of Nevada to understand that we have what America's all about."

    Underscoring that they are making a big play for Nevada, all of the Democratic candidates will head from the debate to Paris Las Vegas, where the Clark County Democratic Party is having a sold-out fundraising dinner.

    The eight candidates will each have seven minutes to address the hundreds of party activists, most of whom will be precinct captains in the January caucuses. While the debate is aimed at a national audience, the Jefferson Jackson dinner plays to a local one and could be the candidates' best chance to win over caucus voters in the county that is home to three-quarters of the state's Democrats.

    How the dinner audience responds to the candidates' messages will be scrutinized for clues to how they're being received by this key constituency, Sabato said.

    And because the candidates will be fresh from the debate stage, there could be some fireworks as they bring with them leftover energy and tension.

    The debate and the Nevada contest are both seen as Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., versus everyone else.

    A new Nevada poll released Wednesday reinforced that Clinton enjoys a vast lead in the Silver State. Clinton had the support of 51 percent of likely Democratic caucus-goers in the survey, conducted between Friday and Tuesday for CNN by Opinion Research Corp.

    Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois trailed with 23 percent, while former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina had 11 percent. No other candidate had more than 5 percent of the vote in the poll of 389 voters, which carried a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.

    Clinton has led every Nevada poll by double digits. Polls in Iowa and New Hampshire have been closer. Blitzer said the race should by no means be seen as a foregone conclusion.

    "You never know," he said, pointing out that former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean had a seemingly insurmountable lead in polls just weeks before the 2004 Iowa caucuses, where he was toppled by Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts. "Poll-wise, it's hard to know who's going to show up, and people make up their minds near the end.

    "This is not a done deal yet by any means. This is still a serious campaign. The issues are really significant. There are significant differences between the Democrats, and differences between the Democratic field and the Republican field."

    Tonight's debate could well be a linchpin for the race, Sabato said. A debate in Philadelphia two weeks ago was the first of a dozen such events to really get interesting, with the other candidates, especially Edwards, sharpening their criticisms of a previously unshakable Clinton.

    The Philadelphia event was an object lesson in the power of debates to alter the dynamics of the race.

    "It was tone-changing," Sabato said. As such, it set expectations for tonight higher than ever before.

    "If the last one had been boring like all the others, people would still be wondering, 'Are we finally going to see some fireworks?' " he said. "Now that the race is finally broken open to a degree, people are really tuning in and getting excited."

    The question for tonight will be whether Clinton, who has acknowledged Philadelphia wasn't her best performance, will "strike back," or whether her main challengers, Obama and Edwards, can "continue their momentum" and turn it into increased support.

    Clinton, Sabato said, will be fighting the perception that she splits hairs and dodges questions rather than giving straight answers.

    "Hillary Clinton needs to take strong, definitive stands," Sabato said. "Any waffling is not going to fly."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or (702) 387-2919.



    Leave Your Comment 28 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Michael Ray Thompson wrote on April 30, 2008 08:28 PM: Hillary will not win the nomination. Barak O'bama will. He'll lose to Senator McCain in the general election. John McCain will be our next President. Democrats are idiots. Hillary is simply a biproduct of the excesses of Bill Clinton's administration. Barak O'bama is simply the wanderboy of the Democratic left. Congratualations, President McCain.


    dsudn wrote on November 30, 2007 06:08 AM: I do wonder why so much campaign coverage focuses on the horse race and the heat rather than on the issues. It makes campaign coverage seem more like Hollywood gossip rather than what it should be, in my opinion, which is a serious forum on what the candidates stand for. I don't think the voting public is served well when the majority of what they are presented by the media has to do with who got the best licks in during a debate or scored the best punches. We need more than that when deciding who to vote for.


    none wrote on November 16, 2007 07:59 AM: It was just a waste of time last night.

    Same BS, just a different day.



    NAFTA was a good ideal, it just did not work the way we thought.



    Well if it is not working why has Hillary, Obama, or Kucinch not put fourth a bill to withdraw from NAFTA? Same goes for the Republicans! Funny they all can say that it is not working, but none of them can try to fix it.



    Same with China and WTO! It is Bush, he should do it. It is not my job, do not blame me, blame BUSH! The Senate and the House spend money like it is going out of style, BLAME BUSH! (partly to blame, but not all of it) The schools are failing, BLAME BUSH! Even though, those same schools have been failing for longer than Bush has been in office.



    Oh you are acting like a bunch of Republicans by slinging mud at me. Sounds like a good way to get the Republicans to work with you Hillary.



    Get a life Hillary, as far from the public as you can, and then BLAME BUSH!


    none wrote on November 16, 2007 07:58 AM: It was just a waste of time last night.
    Same BS, just a different day.

    NAFTA was a good ideal, it just did not work the way we thought.

    Well if it is not working why has Hillary, Obama, or Kucinch put fourth a bill to withdraw from NAFTA? Same goes for the Republicans! Funny they all can say that it is not working, but none of them can try to fix it.

    Same with China and WTO! It is Bush, he should do it. It is not my job, do not blame me, blame BUSH! The Senate and the House spend money like it is going out of style, BLAME BUSH! (partly to blame, but not all of it) The schools are failing, BLAME BUSH! Even though, those same schools have been failing for longer than Bush has been in office.

    Oh you are acting like a bunch of Republicans by slinging mud at me. Sounds like a good way to get the Republicans to work with you Hillary.

    Get a life Hillary, as far from the public as you can, and then BLAME BUSH!


    Jeremy wrote on November 15, 2007 09:57 PM: I agree with Illinoisman2007, boots and bricks are all we need, for all you old school punkers, you know what I mean.


    Eric wrote on November 15, 2007 09:19 PM: They talked too fast.....


    Illinoisman2007 wrote on November 15, 2007 08:34 PM: This is pointless. Complete anarchy would solve the U.S.'s problems and is obviously the best solution.


    karen wrote on November 15, 2007 07:15 PM: The saddest moment for me, as a military wife, was seeing a grown man, a military man, there with his mommy. It is hard to believe a guy with 3 tours would allow his mommy to speak for him. It was absolutely embarrassing for him, and I imagine he needs to get out of the military, go to college, find a girlfriend, have a real relationship, and get away from his mommy.


    Karen wrote on November 15, 2007 07:11 PM: This debate was not a good reflection of Las Vegas. It is scary that people would vote for one of these idiots. The candidates never answered the Yucca Mountain question and all I heard is they are for killing babies but making sure criminals are confortable in our country.


    jerry wrote on November 15, 2007 07:05 PM: Good Lord, they are so stupid there wasn't even a feeble attempt to disguise the bias in the so called "undecided voters" questions! The woman up first read her carefully crafted attack upon Pres Bush attempting to roll it all into a Iran situation to protect her son. This was where I changed channels to watch "Blazing Saddles", and was more real than the "debate".


    Read All Comments