Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

News


Panel considers budget cuts, mental health care

Two weeks ago, Stuart Ghertner, director of the Southern Nevada Mental Health Services, was told to find a way to fix what ails the state's mental health system.

His idea was to create a community-based psychiatric emergency response center that would be the designated facility to provide medical clearance for the mentally ill, thus alleviating the crowding of emergency room beds.

The concept is being used in several other states including Arizona, where Ghertner worked before coming to Clark County.

It was one of several ideas about how to safely divert people from ERs that was presented Tuesday to the Legislative Committee on Health Care.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Larson tells a tale of dating Clooney
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • HENDERSON FATAL SHOOTING: Witnesses rebut police
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING IN HENDERSON: Witnesses testify woman had knife
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery



  • But Ghertner's proposal is merely an idea at this point, one that's being pitched by a division facing significant cuts in funding. And since no one knows the costs associated with such a system, officials are hard pressed to say whether it will ever become a reality.

    Carlos Brandenburg, director of the state's Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services, told the committee his department will lose $51 million in state funding should Gov. Jim Gibbons' maximum proposed budget cut of 8 percent become reality. That figure includes about $13 million in federal matching dollars, Brandenburg told the committee during a lengthy meeting dedicated almost entirely to mental health care.

    Brandenburg couldn't say what services within the division are possibly on the chopping block. But, he said, "I'd be remiss if I didn't say all options are on the table.''

    One option worrying committee members, as well as Southern Nevada mental health officials, is the loss of 22 beds scheduled to open Jan. 1 at the old psychiatric facility along West Charleston Boulevard. Southern Nevada is already set on Dec. 31 to lose 20 to 25 psychiatric beds from West Care, a nonprofit entity that serves indigent and low-income Nevadans and is providing the mental health agency with beds.

    West Care, like Ghertner, proposed a system that would create facilities where mentally ill patients can receive medical clearance outside a hospital setting.

    Brandenburg's news, in addition to a report by Dr. Leslie Dickson, professor of psychiatry at University of Nevada School of Medicine on shortages of psychiatrists, problems with recruitment and the overall emergency room problem, was unwelcome news to committee members.

    "It is completely unacceptable to cut $51 million from mental health," said Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno,

    "I'm really, really afraid mental health is going to suffer as it did in 1991,'' she said. "We're not happy about this. ... Our most vulnerable are going to be the ones to suffer.''

    Dickson and Sen. Joe Heck, R-Henderson, said Las Vegas Valley emergency rooms are on pace to see between 11,000 and 13,000 mental health patients this year. Only about 20 to 30 percent of them will ultimately be transferred to Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, Dickson said.

    Under Ghertner's plan for medical clearance, the psychiatric emergency response center would include crisis intervention, time limited interdisciplinary evaluation and treatment, on-site resources to support continued recovery, discharge with treatment recommendations and referrals to outside resources.

    The goals of the center are to provide structure and support to stabilize the person in crisis, assess the individual's psychiatric needs and to provide a full range of safe psychiatric emergency services, Ghertner said. More importantly though, the psychiatric emergency response center would shore up acute care beds now being taken by Legal 2000 patients. Legal 2000 is a statewide system used to initiate involuntary commitment of someone who is considered a danger to himself or others.

    Heck, who was in support of this plan, called it an idea that has floated around for years but which has never come to fruition. He said providing medical clearance outside of an emergency room setting is crucial to solving the mental health crisis in Southern Nevada.

    "The impact on the hospitals is tremendous,'' he said while showing the committee a Web-based tracking system used to monitor patients being admitted into area emergency rooms. Around noon Tuesday, roughly 46 patients were at area hospitals on Legal 2000 holds, Heck showed. The most, 10, were being held at UMC.

    "If you take 30 percent off the top, you already have made a big impact,'' Heck said, referring to the number of patients who need to be placed in a psychiatric facility.

    Ghertner's proposal also received support from Bill Welch, president and chief executive officer of the Nevada Hospital Association, and Gary Milliken, representing American Medical Response and Medic West.

    Milliken said between November 2006 and Oct. 31, 2007, AMR and MedicWest ambulances transported 4,477 people who were on a Legal 2000 hold to an area emergency room or a psychiatric facility. Of those, 788 calls were initiated by Las Vegas police and 2,600 were initiated by hospitals.

    He said AMR and Medic West, which are the same company now, billed $1.8 million for those transfers but collected only $400,000.

    "We wrote off $1.4 million,'' he said. "We basically pay for that loss.''

    Leslie, who, toward the end of the meeting stopped Ghertner from speaking because the information he was providing was too unsettling, asked the committee whether a letter should be sent to the governor about sparing mental health from budget cuts.

    Sen. Maurice Washington, R-Sparks, vice chairman, recommended the letter contain language about keeping the 22 psychiatric beds scheduled to open Jan. 1.

    Contact reporter Annette Wells at awells@reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0283.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Nancy wrote on November 29, 2007 11:28 PM: The Las Vegas community already has a multitude of social problems. Instead of the State of NV increasing mental health resources to improve everyone's safety and overall quality of life they are decreasing resources?? Where are our priorities? Decreasing resources and access to appropriate mental health care is a disaster in the making. Watch what happens to our citizens and our community if the Governor follows through with this budget cut. Violent crimes, suicides, homicides, incarceration, poverty...all will increase. Is this what our politicians want for our community? A very sad state of affairs indeed.


    Mamamia wrote on November 28, 2007 06:46 PM: I think this funding is the most important one in the entire state budget next to education and medical care for the indigent. Mental illness is the direct cause of human suffering and most of the violence that is happening in our society. 22 beds is appallingly insufficient for the thousands of mentally ill persons who now fill up the prisons and jails, not to mention the homeless shelters and local hospitals. Wake up, Nevada, and do something worthwhile that helps the people,which is all of us,ultimately.


    Patricia C wrote on November 28, 2007 02:13 PM: These are real people with real mental ilnesses and there's nowhere else for them to go for treatment. If WestCare has a proven plan with the staff in place to implement it, why are you hemming and hawing? Would you rather have these people suffer needlessly because you can't make a viable decision and stick to it. Maybe they should camp out on your office steps or sleep in front of your homes in order to get the services that they are entitled to. Give them a fraction of the attention that you give the casinos, and you will not only be saving worhtwhile lives, but jobs as well.


    DJ2 wrote on November 28, 2007 02:11 PM: "Leslie, who, toward the end of the meeting stopped Ghertner from speaking because the information he was providing was too unsettling, asked the committee whether a letter should be sent to the governor about sparing mental health from budget cuts."

    Does anyone find that statement rather odd? When is the last time a person was told to stop speaking because the information was too "unsettling"? If an informed decision on how to manage this problem is to be made, doesn't the problem need to be fully examined and understood in all of its' ugliness?


    Misty wrote on November 28, 2007 02:01 PM: WestCare is helping to keep the mentally ill off the streets, and providing them with needed medications and counseling. Just take a look on Owens Street.


    Karen wrote on November 28, 2007 11:23 AM: Stuart Ghertner has an idea on how to fix what ails the state's mental health system. WestCare can have a community-based psychiatric emergency response center up and running in 30 days. The state will take how long, 9 months or more? What are we waiting for?


    Mary wrote on November 28, 2007 10:35 AM: Tell the state to get a grip this is not about them, but about the people with mental illness, they were not able to implement a good strategy in almost 3years, what makes them think that they are able to do it now, I am trying to understand why can’t they work along with WestCare to help take some of the responsibility of handling people with mental illness/drug problems, so far WestCare has being doing a great job, these Politicians need to get off their high house and admit that they can use the help.


    Jen wrote on November 28, 2007 08:09 AM: That's a good idea. Don't provide care for the mentally ill. See what happens. Good times.