Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


SEX ABUSE CASE: Juror misconduct cited

Web research ruled inappropriate, but did not affect verdict

A member of a jury who privately researched pornographic Web sites during a sexual abuse trial in August committed juror misconduct, a judge found on Friday.

But District Judge Jackie Glass denied a new trial for former Kesterson Elementary School teacher Mark Zana, saying the juror's misconduct did not impact the decision in the case.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • On Aug 13, the jury found that Zana, 40, sexually abused three of his students by putting his hand down the shirts of two former students and encouraging one student to dig in his pockets for candy. He was also found guilty of six felony counts of possession of child pornography. He was acquitted of six other similar counts.

    Defense attorney Tom Pitaro had requested a new trial, arguing that three jurors who conducted independent research outside of the trial had prejudiced the entire jury.

    "None of us know how it affected the ultimate verdict," he said.

    Pitaro had also questioned an expert during the trial who stated it is impossible to tell the ages of females on pornography Web sites found on Zana's computers and that some sites depict women over the age 18 who have a more youthful appearance.

    Several weeks after the verdict, a juror told Glass' staff that a fellow juror had done independent research, which that juror discussed during deliberations.

    Glass hauled the jurors back to court in October. After questioning each separately, she said Friday she learned that one juror had tried to look on his home computer for the Web site the expert had discussed.

    All of the jurors were cautioned multiple times not to conduct independent research of any kind during the trial.

    Two other jurors said they conducted their own experiments by trying to determine ages of young women at a church and at a mall.

    Glass found those two jurors were exercising their common sense and had done nothing wrong.

    The juror who researched the pornography sites had committed misconduct, but Glass determined that any information he had gleaned from that experiment was "vague and ambiguous."

    "I didn't find that the average hypothetical juror would be influenced by what that juror did," she said.

    Prosecutor Tom Carroll had argued the juror who did Internet research told the judge and attorneys during questioning he did so to argue his belief that Zana was innocent, which was not prejudicial to the defendant.

    "The juror didn't research Mark Zana. He didn't go out and look for background information," Carroll said.

    After the hearing, Pitaro said he plans to appeal the decision to the Nevada Supreme Court.

    Zana will be sentenced Dec. 20.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Lisa wrote on December 02, 2007 12:54 PM: Jury misconduct is jury misconduct...lets not forget a JURY let OJ get off the first time around...NOT A PERFECT SYSTEM. Smile and say cheese for the cameras Judge Jackie Glass!


    Beth wrote on December 02, 2007 06:14 AM: Mark Zana once again is being "railroaded" by the system! This should have been a mistrial! Those jurors didn't so their job and neither did Judge Glass!! She's more interested in getting her highlights retouched for her "15 minutes" with O.J.'s than giving a man a fair shake!


    RCOLE wrote on December 01, 2007 09:50 AM: Sex abuse is sex abuse punish him for his crimes, it seems the jurors were trying to help him, by investigating common judgements