echoscanr wrote on January 17, 2008 01:01 PM:
Harry is a bumbler, really brutalizes and stumbles around alot when he's speaking. He needs to be in the high school english again. I sure hope he doesn't decide to run for office again. If so, we need to place him in the crosshairs and retire him to that little eatery in searchlight.

Michael Ray Thompson wrote on December 26, 2007 06:56 PM: I really hope that Governor Gibbons' poll numbers go up before election day. The Democrats have launched an all out frontal assault on his character. They recruited that lady saying that then-candidate Gibbons sexually harrassed her during the campaign. The Democrats had nothing then, so naturally they devised that Hollywood scheme that Gibbons was a notorious sex addict. In normal, non-political life, that accusation would have gone nowhere. The news media let Bill Clinton off the hook with Paula Jones and Jennifer Flowers, but they are determined to hang Jim Gibbons.

Hugh Haynsworth wrote on December 22, 2007 11:42 AM: I just saw some one-on-one polls for president. I was really hoping for a view of how Paul is doing in your state. Some Ron Paul sites claim that he can win your state. What is interesting is, you don't even ask if anybody in the state knows who he is?

Ron Paul is only the candidate with the best fund raising this quarter, and the largest fund raiser for a single day.

Some of your TV news competitors have acknowledged his existence by giving him lengthy interviews. I think one commentator even said he was going to win Nevada. Wake up and see exactly where he is in your state polls.

David Tracy wrote on December 12, 2007 12:08 AM: When I look at the photo of Sen. Reid that the RJ provides for this article as of 11:58 P.M. Tuesday, December 11, he does look like doo-doo. Similarly, so did the RJ's large photo of Hillary on Monday, December 10.

As if close up photos, especially non-complimentary ones (you should see the one on my driver's license) are an indicator of the likableness of a candidate. But the RJ propagandists know that they do, so that's why the Reid and Clinton photos are ugly: to short-circuit your analysis of their respective positions in comparison to the libertarian and ultra-right-wingers' arguments. RJ chief Sherman Frederick et. al. would have you vote for anyone besides Reid or Clinton (the people whom they feel most threatened by).

The guy responsible for the RJ's shading on Harry's neck and the accentuation of the lines on Hillary's face knows who signs his paycheck.

Have you seen a really ugly picture of a good old Republican on this Web site lately?

'Nuff said.

skunked wrote on December 11, 2007 08:02 PM: He is the majority leader alright.



The leader of the majority of the good ole boys.

Lenny wrote on December 11, 2007 05:40 PM: Dennis 1944,

"I didn't know he owned it."

Have you checked the BLM land swaps??
His buds sure do. But he says it was good fo Nevada. I think it was better for his buds.
Google "Dirty Harry Reid"

Lee wrote on December 11, 2007 05:29 PM: Kell, WAKE UP ! it is not about what !side of the aisle you sit on anymore. I think people are starting to realize, Republican and Democrats have blurred the lines. I am Republican, but I think they are just as bad as Democrats. Our so called, "represenitives" in Washington could care less about us. All they care about is maintaining power and staying elected. They tell you what you want to hear during elections then ignore you until the next elections. It is time for the people of this grand ole country wake up and take it back. What is it going to take, I do not know. But we can not continue on the course we are on now.

Lee wrote on December 11, 2007 05:22 PM: Reid is a wimp. Put a dress on him and you could not tell the differnce. Thank God he can not get anything done in the Senate. No telling what kind of trouble this country would be in if he could. What an embarrassment to the state of Nevada. Let's get rid of this clown and send someone who has a little backbone.

oldlawdawg wrote on December 11, 2007 05:05 PM: The approval rateing for Harry actually seems high to me -- 41%? One wonders whether that number will fall like a rock as more people register to vote in the next 11 months before the elections (the poll was taken of registered voters, a factor which skews all polls during this period of a presidential election year as more Democrats are registered to vote for early caucuses than are Republicans, who often don't even bother with the primaries before registering, let alone some new "caucus" program).

As a moderate who regularly votes with little regard to party affiliation, I have voted for Reid in the past, but now not only regret it, but resent Harry for lying by placing Nevada and the nation in the backseat to his relentless, hardcore partisan bickering and gridlock. I am now convinced that Harry has to go, and can find extremely few Nevadans who think well of him at all, including devoted Democrats who will vote for him anyway. Harry has unequivocally demonstrated that he will use his power as Majority Leader not for the benefit of Nevada and the nation, but as a partisan bully-pulpet for the Democratic Party. Nevadans who buy into his inevitable re-election rhetoric to the contrary, or claims that he can now focus on Nevada since the presidential race is over, will get taken for a ride. If Harry's focus shifts to anything at all,it will be to corruption and graft in the promotion of his huge real estate ventures in which he and his developer cronies have enormous financial interests. I would not be a bit surprised if scandals come to light between now and his re-election which force him to "retire," even before he helps Rory to a higher,possibly national,office. HARRY'S GOT TO GO!

GOD wrote on December 11, 2007 04:55 PM: This poll reiterates what we already knew... Crazy Harry Reid is on his way out.

Crazy Harry Reid represents special interest and his liberal puppeteers who are pulling his strings --- HE CERTAINLY DOESN'T REPRESENT NEVADA!!!

Read All Comments