Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

News


Criminal citations set in Harrah's remodeling

On Friday afternoon, when many Las Vegans were scurrying home for a carefree weekend, Clark County's building division delivered 17 criminal misdemeanor citations for problematic remodeling work at the Rio and Harrah's Las Vegas hotels.

"We received the notices in the middle to late afternoon. We're just now reviewing them, so I can't comment any further than that," spokeswoman Marybel Batjer said early Friday evening.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Phelps galpal gets exposure on Web
  • NORM: Robin Gibb in airport standoff
  • NORM: Web site shows life of Mazzeo
  • NORM: Britney-LV buzz hard to nail down
  • NORM: Wynn coveted cathedral's land
  • DOUG ELFMAN: Comedian says his arrest a joke
  • Las Vegas police use saturation strategy to cool 'hot spots' of crime
  • 2-year-old boy dies in dog attack
  • Fresh-faced trio wows throng of youthful fans at MGM Grand
  • DOUG ELFMAN: Cab, limo drivers take pulse of tourists



  • Batjer is a vice president of Harrah's Entertainment, the gaming company that owns the two hotels as well as a warehouse that received an 18th citation. That property, 3665 W. Twain Ave., housed Roman Empire Development, a remodeling subsidiary that Harrah's Entertainment shut down earlier in the week.

    Reached after the end of the business day, county spokeswoman Stacey Welling said 13 citations involved Harrah's on the Strip and four involved the Rio. The two hotels in the past several years underwent remodeling projects that either took place without permits or inspections, or resulted in some substandard work.

    Because most county personnel were already gone from the job, Welling said she could not obtain copies of the citations, which are public documents, but should be able to release them Monday.

    Because of the late hour, Welling said, she could not get the names of parties identified in the citations. But they are individuals as opposed to business entities, she disclosed.

    The county has said its fire department will also issue citations in connection with the remodeling projects.

    Welling did not know when those citations will come out. "I know the departments were working with their respective district attorneys," she said.

    UNLV professor William Thompson, who has written widely on the economic impacts of gaming, said Friday he is baffled by the turn of events involving Harrah's Entertainment, which has been reported to be the world's top gaming company in terms of revenue.

    "The hard word is 'criminal,'" said Thompson. "It's hard because that means intent. That connotes a prosecutor thinks there was intent and Harrah's did it knowingly."

    Thompson, a faculty member in the department of public administration at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, admitted he has no special knowledge of the events beyond what he has gleaned from the media. "My initial reaction was, they were sloppy. When you say criminal, it crosses a new line."

    Fire investigator Terry Taylor, from Northern Nevada, said he believes the legal concept of "strict liability" applies to violations of the building code and other safety codes.

    Under strict liability, intent does not matter, only actions, according to Taylor. His view of case law is that when regulatory laws -- such as those that govern traffic flow or building construction -- are violated, it's presumed that the responsible party knew what the law is.

    He cited the hypothetical example of a movie theater owner who may not be present, or even know, when an employee wrongly chains a public exit door shut. That owner can still be held liable for the subordinate's actions in violating fire codes, according to Taylor, who has served at different times in his career as a deputy state fire marshal in Nevada and California. He has credentials to testify in state and federal courts in Nevada and California.

    Contact reporter Joan Whitely at jwhitely@reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0268.



    Leave Your Comment 24 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Gayle Nasby Diggons wrote on December 28, 2007 09:33 AM: This is very sad news about my cousin. I live in MO. and the news has just reached me from the family grapevine.
    I never thought Michael would do something like this, but it seems the facts are there. He will be in my prayers, but the fact remains "if you play you pay"...I hope justice is done..


    Fred Frazzetta wrote on December 18, 2007 12:58 PM: truth:

    We seem to be polarized on the issue of safety and if in fact the rooms are now safer than they were before being fixed. Are you saying that the repairs that have been made thus far at both the Rio & Harrah's Las Vegas Hotels were not needed? I am sure that Mr. Loveman & the in-house attorneys that Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. employs would have put up some sort of fight if that was the case, but again this is only my humble opinion. I am willing to agree to disagree with you. I will point out that some of the violations that were found by the Clark County Building Department & Fire Department were considered major violations as reported by the news media. Furthermore, I have emails from Roman Empire Development employees that state that they were not conducting their projects in the safest of ways. There are witnesses to that fact as well. The simple fact of the matter is this: I filed a complaint that I believed to be true 10 months before I was fired from Harrah's. I have documentation to prove that I contacted numerous personnel within Harrah's to try to remedy this situation, and not one person helped. I have a document in my possession that is signed by Harrah's management personnel giving me permission to contact any agency that I thought was necessary to resolve my complaints...and I did!

    I do agree with you about Mr. Loveman not being incompetent, and knowing what to say to the media...that is why they employ really good attorneys just for this type of situation. I can tell you this, Marcellus McRae and Daniel Weiss the attorneys from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher California are top attorneys...money well spent for upper management's protection.


    truth wrote on December 17, 2007 03:56 PM: Like I said before, NO ONE is any safer because of you. You know it, I know it, and so do the now unemployed. And I'd be willing to bet I don't sound so stupid to most of the people that worked on all of these projects. No, I don't think Mr. Loveman is incompetent but he knows what to say and have published by the press.
    Merry Christmas Mr. Frazzetta.


    Fred Frazzetta wrote on December 16, 2007 06:31 PM: Sto-PM:

    How can you say that I caused this mess? Mike Nasby, Tom Adams, & Mike Whitehead made multiple choices not to pull permits on their remodel projects, even though they knew that they were required to do so by law. Even the other licensed contractors that were involved in these remodels failed to pull permits as required. The law was broken, but to be honest if they had done the work to code it would have been forgiven & forgotten by now. It is the simple fact that they left the rooms in an unsafe condition that has gotten them in the trouble that they are in. It is interesting your suggestion that Upper Management at Harrah's had knowledge of these illegal activities...do you know first hand that this is the case? I am asking you this because if you do I know some people that would like to talk to you, those that come to mind are: the Clark County Building Department, the CC Fire Department, the attorneys working for Harrah's, and of course Joan Whitely. I strongly encourage you to come forward with the information that you have and help resolve this issue once and for all. If you have light to shed on this do so...

    The facts thus far clearly show that I have told nothing but the truth, and this has been confirmed by the Clark County Building Department, including Virginia Valentine, County Manager; the CC Fire Department; Penta Construction, and even Gary Loveman, the CEO/President of Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. confirmed it in his memorandum which he issued this past week. The very issuing of the Criminal Citations confirms that my allegations were found to be true. I rest my case Harrah's willfully broke the law as evidenced by their illegal actions.


    Fred Frazzetta wrote on December 16, 2007 04:15 PM: truth:

    Do you realize how stupid & ignorant you sound? Probably not...it is people like you that allow things like this to happen. What kind of drugs do you do - criminal charges were filed not because of what I have said, but because of what they found once the walls were open. Seeing I had nothing to do with the actual physical inspections or the investigations maybe you should start accusing the Clark County Building Department, the Fire Department, all the Clark County Commissioners, and the RJ of all being in my pocket. That's right I orchestrated the whole thing and I have paid everyone off. The guilty ones that are at the direct center of this Mike Nasby, Mike Whitehead, Tom Adams, Leon Vermillion, and George Kirkwood have not spoken many words...I haven't heard them deny one allegation. To those bright enough to put 2 + 2 together this speaks volumes. If they are so innocent then they have nothing to worry about do they, but both of us know along with most of Las Vegas that this is not the case.

    The improper renovation "incidents have been the most disturbing issues I have faced in my five years as CEO," Mr. Loveman said in a memo to all employees Wednesday. It's the job of senior management "to ensure that ethical standards are never sacrificed in pursuit of deadlines or profits." The improper work "may have jeopardized our most precious asset," Mr. Loveman wrote, "the confidence and trust of our guests and employees. ... In the future, all renovation work will be conducted by outside contractors." Enough said...I suppose Mr. Loveman is also: ignorant, vindictive, a liar INCOMPETENT and one of my good sheep. If you ever find the courage...we would love to know your name...


    truth wrote on December 16, 2007 09:16 AM: It’s sad to watch all the sheep jump on Frazzetta’s hysterical band wagon. Mr. Frazzetta you are an alarmist, and that’s putting it mildly. No one is any safer because of you, not employee, not patron. At some point I hope the real truth comes out about you and your ignorant, vindictive, INCOMPETENT, minions. And all you sheep out there…………. What can I say? You have no idea what’s really going on. Don’t tell me that it doesn’t matter what his motives were. In this case it does. Don’t throw out the bull about the difference between stealing a few light bulbs and endangering peoples lives, more bull. No one’s life was in danger, ever, and all the people that lost their jobs know this (including Frazzetta). Now I’m sure I’ll get the Frazzetta & Sheep hysteria machine cranking out more bull! Save it. Get a life, get a job, stop stealing from your employers. By the way, I hear there were more than light bulbs stolen. True???? Oh yeah, that would not be a queston you would not answer.


    more truth wrote on December 16, 2007 09:05 AM: It’s sad to watch all the sheep jump on Frazzetta’s hysterical band wagon. Mr. Frazzetta you are an alarmist, and that’s putting it mildly. No one is any safer because of you, not employee, not patron. At some point I hope the real truth comes out about you and your ignorant, vindictive, INCOMPETENT, minions. And all you sheep out there…………. What can I say? You have no idea what’s really going on. Don’t tell me that it doesn’t matter what his motives were. In this case it does. Don’t throw out the crap about the difference between stealing a few light bulbs and endangering peoples lives, more crap. No one’s life was in danger, ever, and all the people that lost their jobs know this (INCLUDING FRAZZETTA). Now I’m sure I’ll get the Frazzetta & Sheep hysteria machine cranking out more crap! Save it. Get a life, get a job, stop stealing from your employers. By the way, I hear there were other things stolen before the light bulbs. True???? Oh yeah, that would not be a queston you would answer.


    LV Contractor wrote on December 16, 2007 08:56 AM: Mr. Frazzetta, what were the asbestos levels?


    Sto-PM wrote on December 16, 2007 08:50 AM: Fred,
    Why are you still going on with this? The workers and management @ RED were fired, the hotel`s involved are taking corective actions and are making a commitment to ensure the safety of the public. Even Gary Loveman commended you as an employee for bringing up such infractions in his memo to the company and RJ.

    I beleive you have alterior motives ones that are of the personell nature I have read every single comment you have made and not one was for the public safety, because if it was you would have quit a long time ago. The real truth is that you were caught stealing from the company and you have a vendetta going you never once said yeah, I did it I was caught stealing did you NO!

    Really Fred all you have done is caused one hell of a mess, Mr. Nasby , Mr. Adams and Mike Whitehead were simply doing there jobs and that is taking direct orders from above, and at no time were they or the company officers ever putting the public at risk. Your just a maggate trying to make a name for himself who indulges on thinking you will capitlize on a situation you really don`t know what your talking about.

    I belive your a SPEED FREAK that stays up all night and schemes on what to say next, look at when you wrote your last blog 3:04 AM; who the hell is up that late? Fred give it up, everybody is tired of your lies, even Joan Whitely is not behind you like she was.

    Fred its 8:35 AM; your probabley asleep dreaming of your next scam, well time is running out on this one, or having nightmares about when karma is gonna get you.


    Fred Frazzetta wrote on December 16, 2007 03:04 AM: Here's a list of what Mr. Maddox got right on his inspection report:

    He sent the memorandum to the proper people. His name is correct. He went to the right Hotel, and the location of the hotel is correct. He got the name of the Towers correct. I will give him the benefit of the doubt as to the number of rooms he inspected.

    This is what is incorrect:

    The Cabana Tower was built in four phases - the fourth phase being the extension of Tower II - minor detail. He almost spelled my name right - my name did appear correctly on the original complaint on file, after six long months an easy mistake to make. I had complained about illegal remodel work which was done in all three towers from the 3rd through the 19th floors...I really don't know what got remolded. Actually, in all three towers the floors were standard rooms from the 3rd through the 19th floors per the original plans on record on the Clark County Building Department's very own public computer database - easy mistake to make after six months of obviously in-depth research done by Mr. Maddox. Phase 1 tower was the only tower which had only handicapped rooms located on the third floor...minor detail easily missed. As you can see Mr. Maddox was very thorough with his inspection as he walked 37 rooms in all, but he failed to notate in his report what rooms...I guess another oversight on his part. He does claim that everything matched the approved plans on record...which is totally false. He never identifies the Harrah's personnel that he walked the rooms with...the same ones that told him that it was just a "cosmetic" remodel. It was nice of him to give them a copy of the CC Building Code!


    Read All Comments