Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


State high court denies pursuit of death penalty

Clark County district attorney's arguments rejected in 2005 murder-for-hire case

CARSON CITY -- An effort by the Clark County district attorney's office to seek the death penalty in a murder-for-hire case involving the son of a former owner of a North Las Vegas strip club was rejected Thursday by the Nevada Supreme Court.

In the case involving Luis Hidalgo III and Anabel Espindola, facing trial in the slaying of Timothy Hadland, the court found that the act of solicitation to commit murder is not a crime that can be used as an aggravating factor to seek the death penalty.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: When live news shots turn bad
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • The court rejected another aggravating factor the district attorney's office had sought to use in the case. With no aggravating factors left, the court rejected the notices of intent to seek the death penalty filed by prosecutors.

    Hidalgo III is the son of Luis A. Hidalgo Jr., the former owner of the Palomino Club on North Las Vegas Boulevard. Espindola is the longtime girlfriend of Hidalgo Jr.

    Hidalgo III and Espindola are charged with murder in the May 2005 shooting of Hadland, a former Palomino employee, who was slain near Lake Mead.

    Authorities allege the defendants hired two men to kill Hadland, possibly because he was bad-mouthing the club to cabdrivers who might bring customers to the business.

    The aggravating factors were sought based on charges of solicitation to commit the murders of two alleged witnesses to Hadland's death. They would have been applied during the penalty phase assuming a jury had returned guilty verdicts on the charges.

    But the court said that solicitation to commit murder, although it solicits a violent act, is not itself a felony crime that can be used to seek the death penalty. The solicitation counts were proposed to be used under a provision for crimes involving the use or threat of violence.

    "Obviously, the nature of the crime petitioners allegedly solicited is itself violent," the court majority said.

    "But this does not transform soliciting murder into threatening murder within our view of the meaning of the statute."

    Chief Justice Bill Maupin disagreed that the solicitation counts could not be used as aggravating circumstances to seek the death penalty. A crime of solicitation to commit murder does involve the communication of a threat of violence to another person, he said.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Moblyw wrote on December 28, 2007 07:56 PM: MONEY TALKS!

    Hey out there! Nothings changed! In Nevada if your connected, or have cash flow, you always get a better deal, then the other guy!


    tm wrote on December 28, 2007 12:36 PM: death penalty,death penaltty. to anybody who kills. what wrong with our laws. tm


    miguel raiz wrote on December 28, 2007 10:59 AM: Every Judge that voted that "solicitation to commit murder" cannot be a factor to ask for the death penalty should be voted out of office. The logical end of soliciting murder, is murder: would they be happier if the plot suceeded, and there was a corpse? What is wrong with these people? Only Justice Maupin got it right. Vote the bums out!!!