Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


YUCCA MOUNTAIN: DOE lays off 63 workers

Almost all site activity stopped




WASHINGTON -- The Department of Energy on Monday disclosed it was dramatically scaling back at Yucca Mountain, laying off dozens of workers and shutting down nearly all activity at the nuclear waste site in response to deep budget cuts.

"The tunnel is closed for all intents and purposes," DOE spokesman Allen Benson said. Barriers may be placed at the mouth of the 25-foot-diameter exploratory tunnel that represented more than a decade of activity at the nuclear waste site 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • DOE officials described a new round of layoffs as a "restructuring" forced by budget shortfalls and a way to conserve money. They told members of Congress that they will continue to work in Las Vegas offices to move forward in building a construction license for a waste-handling complex and underground repository.

    But officials did not rule out other layoffs and delays, including possible decisions to put off plans to file for a license by the end of June.

    "We are still evaluating what this latest reduction does to us," said Jason Bohne, a spokesman for Bechtel SAIC, the project's managing contractor. "The site is the first real impact and we are looking to see what else."

    The Yucca repository, envisioned to store 70,000 metric tons of highly radioactive material, originally was planned for a 1998 opening. But a long series of DOE missteps, budget cuts engineered in Congress by Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and legal challenges by the state of Nevada have contributed to years of delay.

    Sixty-three workers on the mountain ridge were told Monday they were being laid off, project officials said. They include 27 union metalworkers, electricians, miners and pipefitters, and another 36 people in administrative, environmental safety and health and property management positions.

    DOE officials maintained research needed for licensing has been completed at the site, and the remaining workers were performing largely maintenance tasks. The job cuts are DOE's first response to budget cuts totaling more than $100 million for 2008.

    More than 80 jobs were eliminated in earlier rounds of budget cuts last year.

    DOE was given $386.5 million for this fiscal year, a 22 percent reduction from the Bush administration's request to stay on target. Managers say they are marshalling whatever money they have left to prepare a construction license application.

    Bohne said the site is not being closed, "but it is being greatly reduced." Fewer than 10 DOE caretakers will monitor the site's access to water and electricity and take air quality readings as required by state permits. Security guards will be provided by the Nevada Test Site.

    "We are not just locking the gate and walking away," Bohne said.

    Reid said the cutbacks signal a continuing spiral for Yucca Mountain.

    "I am disappointed that people have to lose their jobs, but this is what this is all about," Reid said.

    "The only number that will make me happy will be zero" as far as Yucca Mountain spending, the senator added.

    Reid said the Bush administration "is playing a game" by characterizing the layoffs as a measure to conserve money for licensing. DOE should shore up safety studies with whatever money it has left, he said.

    Bob Loux, a leading repository critic and executive director of Nevada's Agency for Nuclear Projects, said DOE had little choice but cut back "and I don't think things get any better for them."

    In its upcoming session, Congress is likely to be distracted by presidential politics and unlikely to pass an Energy Department budget, Loux said. The failure to pass a budget until the final week of this year's session contributed to DOE's woes.

    "Until DOE makes up its mind what it is going to do about filing and defending a license application this was probably the only thing they can do in the short run," Loux said of the layoffs.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Mike wrote on January 12, 2008 09:37 AM: This is a classic example of government waste that will never be accounted for. regardless of which side of this debate you happen to land on, the government has already spent well over $10 billion of taxpayers money, that will never be put to good use, because of political machinations in Washington. More $$$ down the proverbial hole. Hey, it's not congresses money, why should they care.


    Paul Sanchez wrote on January 09, 2008 03:58 PM: Geologist N.M.- The project is asked to assume our civilization doesn't exist to manage the waste in the future... any reasonable scientist would not try to predict the myriad variables past 10,000 yrs but are forced to. Pitfalls of the project are self-fulfilling policies imposed on the project created by politicians. The "other" nuclear repository opened in SE New Mexico in 1998. It was oppposed by Clinton/Richardson and then opened during their tenure - the politicians and their hired guns are wagging the public's tail. This is our legacy and our generation's responsibility. To bad the Journal puts a negative bias on everything they print...no wonder everybody is misinformed. Look around the world guys. Even Japan has to do something and they have nowhere near the stability Yucca Mtn has. Geez. P-


    JJ wrote on January 09, 2008 06:27 AM: Thank you Harry Reid for destroying more jobs & having no thought about this country's energy needs. Let's see, you don't want Yucca Mtn to store nuclear waste so you must be against nuclear power plants as well, & you don't want coal power plants because of the pollution...but I'm sure you'll have a good explanation for NV residents as all their energy bills continue to increase...


    Scientist wrote on January 08, 2008 12:01 PM: For years we heard politicians say "let science decide the issue," and all along it has been determined by political posturing. As a former insider, I know the science says the repository should be built.

    Bob Loux and cohorts are nothing short of hired assassins, their target being the YMP. Not one of their claims has passed muster in the scientific community, and the people of Nevada should be outraged at their tremendous waste of taxpayer money. Remember that the YMP is funded by nuclear power ratepayers, not taxpayers.

    The "mismanagement" by DOE has been cosmetic, not substantial. The only problems have been in paperwork. The conclusions of panel after panel of experts has demonstrated the science is good.


    Roger wrote on January 08, 2008 08:55 AM: Good deal. More nails in the coffin for this terrible idea...