Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Critics pounce on Clinton after immigration comments

An off-the-cuff comment Hillary Clinton made in Las Vegas on Thursday has ignited a national firestorm.

Answering a shout from a man in the crowd who said, "I'm married to an illegal woman," Clinton shot back, "No woman is illegal," grinning as the packed Mexican restaurant at which she was speaking exploded in cheers.


Most Popular Stories
  • Planet Hollywood fined for Prive nightclub's actions
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Doctor recalls trip to Jackson's suite
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Hamptons given $96,000 in gifts
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • A bad night at the Minxx during NBA weekend
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • That comment, reported in Friday's Review-Journal, caught the attention of the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs and the Drudge Report and led to nearly 1,000 angry comments on the newspaper's Web site.

    To put the remark into context, Clinton did add, after a pause, "... and no man, either." She then explained her position on immigration.

    But anti-illegal immigration activists weren't upset because of sexism, but because of the implication that those who cross the border illegally aren't lawbreakers. Many demanded an explanation.

    Clinton, a spokeswoman said, meant that she "believes you can be tough on the issue of illegal immigration without being mean-spirited about the human beings involved."

    The spokeswoman, Hilarie Grey, noted that Clinton's position is to secure the border in addition to treating current illegal immigrants humanely.

    "It simply isn't true" that there aren't illegal immigrants, said Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, an anti-illegal immigration group. "We have immigration laws, and yet we have government officials who have sworn to uphold the laws of this country saying if somebody violates them, they make an exception to the rule of law."

    Mehlman's group was one of the main forces in derailing a bipartisan immigration reform bill that passed the U.S. Senate but was killed in the House of Representatives in 2006. The measure failed after a massive grass-roots campaign fueled by talk radio jammed congressional phone lines and e-mail in-boxes.

    The group is nonpartisan and has targeted Republicans who fall out of line with its message just as harshly as it has Democrats.

    "Illegal alien is a legal term," he said. "It describes somebody who violates our immigration laws. You can apply the law to people without showing disrespect to them as human beings. Illegal immigrants should be treated with human decency, but we still need to enforce immigration laws."

    Politicians, Mehlman said, don't understand the anger of average Americans on the immigration issue, anger that crosses party lines.

    "On a gut level, we have millions of people getting away with not playing by the rules while we are expected to play by the rules, so there is a sense of unfairness," he said. "But this also directly affects a lot of people who work for a living, or have kids in school, or rely on social services."

    He added, "I'm sure the children of people Hillary Clinton hangs around with, their kids aren't sitting in classrooms where half the kids don't speak English and nobody's learning anything."

    The episode illustrates the inflammatory nature of the immigration debate as well as the degree to which it hinges on issues of semantics.

    Though immigration is a red-hot issue nationally, it will be spotlighted in the run-up to Nevada's Jan. 19 caucuses, established partly to give Hispanics a voice in the presidential nominating process.

    Las Vegas Democratic activist Tony Sanchez, head of the IMPACTO political action committee of the Latin Chamber of Commerce, said of Clinton's comment, "Good for her."

    Sanchez said he doesn't like it when people are referred to as illegal. "A person can't be illegal," he said. "You can be undocumented. You can not have your papers. You can be noncompliant. But to call people 'illegals' is meanness."

    Sanchez said Clinton shouldn't be portrayed as a radical illegal immigrant-coddler for a few compassionate words. "She didn't say to open up the borders," he said. "She was responding to a crowd that wanted to hear that, and I happen to agree with her."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or (702) 387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 90 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    dresden wrote on January 17, 2008 01:51 AM: The 14th Amendment was not meant for illegal immigrants, Mark, it was meant for children of emancipated slaves. The 14th Amendment is being abused by those who come here illegally. Illegal alien law breakers should be deported back to their home country, along with any children they've had while they're illegally squatting where they don't belong! Anchor babies are just a bad excuse for bad behavior. No more anchor babies!!!


    mark hough wrote on January 16, 2008 02:12 AM: Immigration in our legal system is termed as a civil matter. This is absolutely nonsense. When our country deports mother's and father's who have U.S citizen born children, in my clear opinion this criminal on our part. We have violated the rights of the U.S citizen born child by seperating the mother or father of that child. Plain and simple.


    Dresden wrote on January 14, 2008 06:46 PM: Hey Ivan, my name isn't Billy Bob and neither are the other millions of American "citizens" who are fed up with illegal immigration. Comprehensive Reform is code for amnesty. Why should these law violators jump to the front of the line ahead of people who have waited 10 years or more? And if you knew your history, you'd know that the 1986 amnesty was a total failure. I guess repeating the same thing is a good idea, huh? You hand illegals citizenship and another 20 million come rushing over the border, just like after 1986. And stop with the racist nonsense. This has nothing to do with ethnicity, it has to do with enforcing law so overburdened taxpayers who are sick of picking up the tab can get some relief. 30% of prisons are filled with illegals, billions of dollars to educate their children, billions more to pay for their health care (emergency rooms aren't clinics for illegals), and even billions more in food stamps, housing assistance, and other social and welfare programs. I'll tell you what, why don't you and your liberal friends pay for all this waste, huh? Oh, but I forgot about the increased violent crime, ID theft, overcrowded classrooms, uninsured driving accidents...nevermind. Even if you pay for them, they still need to go! Get a clue Ivan!


    Billy Bob wrote on January 14, 2008 05:52 PM: Eat me Ivan


    USA Citizen wrote on January 14, 2008 04:25 PM: I think it is important to have a Civil discussion about immigration regardless what part you are on.

    I agree with Clinton to secure the borders. I tend to be more conservative on immigration even though I am a Democrat.

    Whether to refer to these people as "undocumented" or "illegal" should be discussed. There is also a major culture clash going on that I don't think a lot of citizens appreciate. it's almost as if "they" being "undocumented" or "illegal" really don't want to integrate with out culture and it creates these third world areas. I am afraid that Hillary Clinton who to me is the best suited might lose the presidency to someone like Mitt Romney because of this and that would be a tragedy in itself. Mitt Romney's anti immigration stance while popular also has a mean spirit about it.


    Ivan wrote on January 14, 2008 10:25 AM: Why do people keep quoting FAIR leaders? They are racists-the modern day version of the KKK!!!
    Newsflash to all the Billy Bobbs in America: a comprehensive immigration reform is a matter of when, not if. And it is the right thing to do. Republicans will find out in November that their disgusting attitude toward anybody who isn't a white-anglo-saxon-protestant is a loser in a diverse America. Rove told them so-alienating LEGAL Latinos will make sure that the GOP is the permanent minority party in our caountry for decades to come!!!


    bat guno wrote on January 13, 2008 06:45 PM: funny just a few 20 or 30 yrs ago i worked picking beans peas fruit put up hay built fences all this stuff these dumbos claim we wont do the difference is at the time i did it it paiiiid fair money.
    as one of our past southern gentlemen once said if i had known things would turn out this way i would have picked my own cotton. not much change in the last 100 yrs or so.....


    brown wrote on January 13, 2008 03:15 PM: Undocumented worker needs to finish his/her schooling.
    Alien: adj. 1. foreign; strange 2.of aliens. n. 1. a foreigner 2. a foreigh-born resident who is not naturalized 3. a hypothetical being from outer space.
    Any person in the USA without proper paperwork is an Illegal Alien. Without naturalization or citizenship, any person who is here with proper documentation is a guest and/or visitor. Once that documentation expires, the guest/visitor status is no longer, and the person becomes an illegal alien.


    Brownie wrote on January 13, 2008 01:25 PM: How about "Dirtnaps"?


    Jarod wrote on January 13, 2008 01:23 PM: How about "dirtnap"?


    Read All Comments