Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


Monorail ridership climbs in 2007

But tally isn't enough to help line break even

The Las Vegas Monorail Co. saw more than 7.9 million riders walk through its turnstiles in 2007, up about 900,000 from the previous year, according to figures released Friday.

Yet, even with the increase in ridership, the monorail did not generate enough money to break even.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway




  • In the past three months, the monorail has brought in nearly $77,000 a day in farebox revenue and seen an average of nearly 22,000 riders daily, both down from the previous quarter. Ridership dropped more than 250,000 from the third quarter to the fourth quarter of 2007, from about 2.23 million to 1.98 million.

    With an average fare of $3.57 collected per passenger, the monorail would need a daily average of about 34,454 riders to generate the $123,000 in daily revenue required to balance the monorail's budget, according to a 2006 estimate by Fitch Ratings, a New York City-based credit ratings firm.

    Since opening to the public on July 15, 2004, the $650-million, four-mile line with seven stops on the east side of the Strip has failed to turn a profit.

    The monorail has yet to match its 2005 performance, which saw 10.2 million riders pass through its turnstiles.

    November was the ninth straight month the monorail topped a daily average of 20,000 riders. In December, it dipped to a 19,157 daily average.

    Ingrid Reisman, vice president of corporate communications for the company, said, "The Las Vegas Monorail Company experienced an increase in year-over-year ridership for the fourth quarter of 2007 of more than 21 percent. We will continue to work hard to promote the Las Vegas Monorail, which will become increasingly critical to mobility in our busy resort corridor."

    The monorail is trying to obtain financing to build a half-billion dollar extension to McCarran International Airport, which officials hope will increase ridership and turn a profit for the company.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    ths wrote on January 20, 2008 01:09 AM: Who do you think pays for all the buses in town and on the strip? Who do you think is going to pay for a rapid bus line from Henderson to NLV.

    Who do you think pays for subways in LA, or light rail in San Diego? Tax payers. A fact is most mass transit even needs tax payers to subsadize their daily operating expenses and never pay a dime back for its construction costs. In truth if this was tax payer dollars it might of been a more complete line that what we see today. Mile for mile it is one of the most successful lines in the way of revenue and riders.


    Report abuse

    LittleBird wrote on January 19, 2008 08:21 PM: ths,
    I don't think evryone forgets, most of us probably didn't know they they made any kind of profits. Everything I have heard and read was the system is running in the red and pulling money out of a pretty good sized slush fund (as you would) to keep out of big financial trouble. Bombardier gets paid by the Las Vegas Monorail Company.
    Nearly everything you hear from the media is always been on the negative side. I turly do hope they go to the airport. Then everyone but the cabbies would be happy, they would still get some of the pie,just not all of it. That would take a lot of traffic away from McCarran to the Strip. Everyone benefits, some a little better than others. It never will be a local commuter unless it goes somewhere. I'm just glad it's private money and not our tax money, I haven't got the right to comlain about how they operate, as it's not my nickel.


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on January 19, 2008 05:20 PM: Why does everyone forget that the Monorail does make an operational profit, what this means it makes more money on average then it costs to operate the line on a daily basis. What it is not covering is its original construction costs.

    The fact that it covers its daily operations is a success compared to many other publicly funded mass transit lines that are more extensive and cannot cover its daily operational costs. Yes it could of been better running down the main strip. As well the Double Duece has taken away ridership as that is a tourist ride with great views, but it does not move fast.

    The RTC should front the money to connect to the airport before it tries to squeeze a dedicated bus line onto the strip and makes a bigger mess then it is now.


    Report abuse

    LittleBird wrote on January 19, 2008 03:03 PM: Sal Sagev,
    It's obvious it's not the Operations team (Bombardier),doesn't that just leave the Las Vegas Monorail Company (managment)?


    Report abuse

    Sal Sagev wrote on January 19, 2008 02:07 PM: I used to work for the monorail and trust me when i say its not the Operations teams fault. The problem lies with the advertising/casino deals that are struck. ridership will vary dependent on the conventions that are in town. Next step would be to authorize the airport line. Its the only way to make ridership go up and maintain a steady stream of customers.


    Report abuse

    douglas wrote on January 19, 2008 08:54 AM: with "glass sided" monorail cars, the tourist-photographers would have had phenomenal views directly toward the sphinx, volcano, lion's head, t.i. ships, eiffel tower, bellagio fountain, venetian facade, ny-ny coaster/skyline, and whatever "faces" the new joints would present.

    many joints already use rear, porte coucheres for taxi & limo access.

    best might be that as a pedestrian mall with mebbe only two "traffic lanes", the joints fronting the strip could regain [buy back from the county ?] depth of a lane or so, extending their premises. each joint could have at least a sidewalk cafe or small entertainment venue. kinda like the champs elysee or via veneto with continuous sidewalk cafes, bistros, "sideshow" presentations of their inside attractions. "showgirls" selling tickets. venues like the display bartenders at harrah's. cars that can be won, and so forth.

    joints could "comp" or include with room rates, a/some "day pass" for both the monorail and smaller, surface, theme park style trams if the trams weren't otherwise free anyway. thus a tourist could view each joint in a monorail trip or two. even little old ladies would have such a convention credential holder on a lanyard during their stay. they already have those players' cards on tethers.

    strip employees could park at some "park & ride" lot off the strip and use the monorail to get to work.

    and each "stop" could be a carpeted, mostly seamless entrance to a joint. the joint would have a small, remote check-in stand. thus the tourist would retrieve baggage at mccarran or primm, wheel the luggage on carpet from the carousel, right up to that hotel check-in stand... strip or downtown. kinda like the tomorrowland hotel at disney. with aging population, long walks have to be eliminated.


    Report abuse

    Marc D wrote on January 19, 2008 08:05 AM: the idea that the monorail wasn't run down the middle of the Strip was ridiculous.

    I have seen stories in this paper where it was reported that the county wants to run a dedicated bus lane down the middle of the Strip now.

    these ppl seem hell bent on keeping up the status quo with bad idea after bad idea and no one ever seems to care about all the idiotic ideas.

    the monorail should have been laid out to run straight down the strip with feeder lines running east and west up the major cross streets so locals could use it to get to work and have tourists riding the main line to get up and down the actual strip.

    the main route should have run from the airport from the very beggining and could have been extended to the downtown area after it started showing a profit,which would have happened on day one with that route instead of the silly waste of money and time that the current route represents.


    Report abuse

    douglas wrote on January 19, 2008 07:39 AM: from day one, the monorail should have connected the airport with downtown, via the strip. instead, the size two hats decided to route the line so as to be little more than an eyesore. the "scenic" route includes views of loading platforms, dumpsters, rooftop air conditioners, employee parking lots, skid steers, building materials.

    the east side only route makes the monorail worthless for west side of the strip venues. and because the stations are more than a block on foot, east of the lv blvd sidewalk, it's easier to walk between a couple of the joints rather than to use the monorail, even it it were free.

    instead of the 1800 palm trees, perhaps the route might have been in the center median of the strip, connecting to those pedestrian overpasses. las vegas blvd south could have been made a pedestrian mall with only theme park trams, licensed pedicabs, and emergency vehicle access.

    when the county started the pedestrian overpass construction, the joints sued to prevent siting one in front of their properties. when the joints figured out that those overpasses funneled foot traffic into competitors' joints, they sued the county, demanding that an overpass be sited in front of their joints.

    no doubt the taxi-limo clique opposed the airport connect. the 12 step mayor should have engineered the extension to downtown instead of the furniture mausoleum. that downtown extension would have equated the downtown joints access to that of the strip venues.

    when fremont street was first restricted to one way traffic, then vacated in favor of the pedestrian mall, there were lots of complaints. would anyone want it to return to vehicular traffic ?

    hopefully the imbeciles in charge will at least provide sufficient footprint at the airport to merge with whatever surface tram/monorail/maglev device that'll serve the primm airport.


    Report abuse

    Balto Bob wrote on January 19, 2008 07:11 AM: Vic is probably right.
    I visit Vegas 3-4 times a year. Extending the Monorail to the airport would be a good idea. Should cut down on street traffic between the Airport and the strip. But,I don't see many investers willing to take on the risk.


    Report abuse

    LittleBird wrote on January 19, 2008 07:10 AM: Looks like the monorail needs some new management. Why do they (management) have such high exspectations of doing something that they have not been able accomplish in the past? They need to trim the fat, and from the looks of it, they should start with the failed management.If it is only getting ridership from The alleyways of the strip, nothing will change that until it goes some place else,ie., airport or down the strip. Until they do that, the failed system will remain the same, with fat managers getting fatter, and eventually the monorail to nowhere will fad off in the smog of the valley.


    Read All Comments