Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


NEVADA SUPREME COURT: LV lawyer files to face chief justice

It's Christensen vs. Gibbons

CARSON CITY -- Chief Justice Mark Gibbons has an opponent in his bid to win re-election to the Nevada Supreme Court with the filing Friday of Las Vegas attorney Thomas Christensen for Seat D.

Christensen was one of three candidates to file for two seats on the Supreme Court on the last day to seek judicial office.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • U.S. HIGHWAY 95 CRASH: Longtime LV officer mourned
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • NORM: At last, Ripa gets her wedding cake
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • ANOTHER SOMBER DAY: Fourth officer in short span dies
  • Surgeon agrees to plea deal in medical malpractice fraud case




  • Las Vegas attorneys Kris Pickering and Nancy Allf filed for the seat being vacated by Justice Bill Maupin, who announced Jan. 8 that he would not seek re-election after his term expires at the end of this year.

    The filing against Gibbons means both of the Supreme Court seats up for election this year will be contested.

    Christensen, a personal injury attorney, could not be reached for comment. He ran unsuccessfully in 2006 for the seat held by then-Supreme Court Justice Nancy Becker. Becker lost to challenger Nancy Saitta, who currently sits on the court.

    Gibbons, an advocate of open government, said he will run on his record of accomplishment during his past five years on the court.

    "I will present my case to the voters," he said.

    Gibbons, 57, is seeking his second term on the court. He won his first Supreme Court term unopposed in 2002. Gibbons had previously served as a judge in Clark County District Court. He first won election to District Court in 1996.

    The two filings for Maupin's seat on Friday make it a four-way race.

    In addition to Pickering and Allf, Las Vegas attorney and previous high court candidate Don Chairez and Washoe County Family Court Judge Deborah Schumacher also have filed to replace Maupin.

    Allf was a finalist to replace retiring Clark County District Judge Joseph Bonaventure Sr. in 2007, but was not picked by Gov. Jim Gibbons.

    Allf, who could not be reached for comment, is with the firm of Parsons, Behle & Latimer in Las Vegas.

    Pickering, 55, is a partner in the Morris Pickering & Peterson law firm in Las Vegas. She was admitted to the Nevada bar in 1977. She earned a bachelor's degree from Yale University and a law degree from the University of California at Davis. Her area of legal practice is in civil litigation.

    "I think I have the experience and qualifications," she said. "I've practiced law for 30 years. I would do a good job."

    Pickering, who grew up in Reno and graduated from Reno High School, decided to file after Maupin announced his intention to step down after his term ends this year.

    "I'm not a politician; I'm a lawyer," she said. "I think I would bring a lot of commitment, energy and integrity to the job."

    Chairez, 52, a former Clark County district judge, ran against Maupin for the Supreme Court B seat in 2002 but lost. He has run for other posts as well, and worked successfully to get a measure on the ballot in 2006 to restrict the ability of governments to take private land through eminent domain. The constitutional amendment will be on the ballot again this November for a second and final vote.

    Chairez also is planning to file another constitutional amendment dealing with judicial reform for the November ballot. Among other changes, it would require judges to disqualify themselves from cases if they had received campaign contributions from the involved parties, and would let voters decide on judicial replacements instead of letting the governor make such appointments.

    Schumacher, 52, has served as a District Court judge since 1997 when she was appointed by then-Gov. Bob Miller to the Family Division. She was twice elected without opposition.

    Before taking the bench, Schumacher was a partner in the statewide law firm of McDonald Carano Wilson, where she specialized in commercial and real estate litigation, bankruptcy and business law.

    The Legislature moved the filing date for court seats to January from May as a way to reduce the influence of campaign contributions in judicial elections.

    Court candidates who end up unopposed will be prohibited from soliciting campaign contributions, a change from past practice. The new rule will not be in effect for the two Supreme Court races.

    Contact Capital Bureau reporter Sean Whaley at swhaley@reviewjournal.com or (775) 687-3900.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    fyi wrote on January 19, 2008 12:55 PM: U.S. Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, DC 20530-0001
    Criminal Division

    Office of Enforcement Operations, Director, 202-514-6809

    Public Integrity Section, Chief, 202-514-1412

    'The Public Integrity Section oversees the federal effort to combat corruption through the prosecution of elected and appointed public officials at all levels of government. The Section has exclusive jurisdiction over allegations of criminal misconduct on the part of federal judges and also monitors the investigation and prosecution of election and conflict of interest crimes. Section attorneys prosecute selected cases against federal, state, and local officials, and are available as a source of advice and expertise to other prosecutors and investigators. Since 1978, the Section has supervised the administration of the Independent Counsel provisions of the Ethics in Government Act.'


    oh my god wrote on January 19, 2008 12:33 PM: If we are going to consider an ambulance chaser for chief justice..noel gage still hasnt been convicted, he is at least qualified based on the court's track record for bypassing the law.


    John Galt wrote on January 19, 2008 10:38 AM: Though I am in agreement in principle with Don Chairez, he needs to open up and read the Constitution. He will find that the chief justice is empowered to recall to duty any justice or judge not defeated in an election. If he Shepardizes the appropriate clause, he will find a supreme court administrative rule limiting the powers of the chief justice to make temporary appoints and that such appoints are subject to the approval of the full court.

    Don, it is NOT the governor who appoints recalled judges. The governor endorses the temporary commission (a piece of paper filed with the secretary of state)-- a mere formality, which may be leading to your confusion.

    Don, be a good lawyer and do a little reading before you do any writing. Then try to no longer be such an embarrassment.