Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


EASTERN NEVADA PIPELINE: Water rights hearing set

Agency seeks right to tap three watersheds

Southern Nevada Water Authority officials will make their case for more water to fill their pipeline across Eastern Nevada at a state hearing that convenes Monday morning in Carson City.

The authority wants state permission to pump more than 11.3 billion gallons of groundwater a year, enough to supply almost 120,000 homes, from three watersheds in central Lincoln County.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • The water would be carried to Las Vegas in the same pipeline the authority plans to build to tap Spring Valley in White Pine County, some 250 miles away.

    The hearing begins at 9 a.m. Monday at the Nevada Legislature building and will be broadcast live over the Internet. It is set to last two weeks and will determine how much water, if any, the authority should be allowed to pump from the three basins.

    Cave Valley, Dry Lake Valley and Delamar Valley lie in a north-south line bracketed by U.S. Highway 93 and state Route 318. The northern one-third of Cave Valley is in White Pine County.

    The authority will argue for the right to pump about 3.8 billion gallons annually from each valley.

    Opponents of the project will try to prove that groundwater cannot be removed without damaging the environment and economic interests in the area.

    The final decision will fall to State Engineer Tracy Taylor, who administers water rights statewide as head of the Nevada Division of Water Resources.

    In April, Taylor granted the authority the right to pump at least 13 billion gallons of groundwater a year from Spring Valley. His decision came after a contentious, two-week hearing in 2006 that drew pipeline opponents from White Pine County, neighboring Utah and elsewhere.

    Less acrimony is expected at next week's hearing.

    Many of the parties that originally were expected to protest the pipeline project have reached side agreements with the authority, including Lincoln County, the U.S. Department of Interior, and most recently the Moapa Band of Paiute Indians.

    Friday has been set aside for public comment. Comments will be logged in Carson City and through video link from the Sawyer Building on Washington Avenue near Las Vegas Boulevard and locations in Caliente and Ely.

    Written input will be accepted through Feb. 29. Taylor's ruling will come out sometime after that.

    It has taken the state engineer's office months to rule on previous groundwater applications of this kind.

    Under the authority's current timeline, groundwater from Eastern Nevada should be flowing from taps in Las Vegas by 2015.

    Construction of the massive pipeline network that will deliver that water could begin late next year and cost more than $2 billion.

    Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean @reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0350.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Roger wrote on February 04, 2008 08:59 AM: Hopefully the cost of raping the rural areas will go up so much, that Mulroy and her group of prostitutes will fail on this. So far they have been able to strongarm everything they want.

    Write some letters. At least SNWA will know that they are universally hated. Let them know how bad they are. Here is their contact info www.snwa.com/html/forms/about_contact_form.html


    Report abuse

    bida wrote on February 02, 2008 07:04 AM: Greed trumps logic every time in Las Vegas and when you have a town run by ignorant city dwellers they have no concern for the rural areas or environment that's what you get. Unfortunately, the water district has more money than common sense at their disposal and a simple solution such as stopping the growth or even slowing it down is never considered. Of course they are quick to blame our political leaders for just doing their bidding.
    Common sense anyone? Quick now before Pat and the Rustlers have us showering on alternate days.


    Report abuse

    Elyite wrote on February 02, 2008 06:48 AM: You all seem to forget that "real" people live in the areas that the SNWA is attempting to rape. We have homes, families and jobs the same as you. The only difference is that we choose to live in a less populated area. What makes you so much more important that we have to have our lives destroyed by what SNWA is trying to do? What gives them the right to suck our land dry? When does it stop? Where does it stop? Sure, the go-ahead will be given for x-number of acre feet of water, but what stops SNWA from whining that more water is needed (and they will), and requesting more and more until there isn't any more (which will most likely be approved when you have the right connections)? After you steal all the water from central Nevada, then what? Who are you going to destroy after that. And all for what? To keep Las Vegas booming? How convenient, but at what cost to rural Nevada families, and our environment. Of course, it doesn't matter, so long as Las Vegas gets what it wants and to hell with the rest of the state. By the way, if you believe the pipeline is going to cost between $2 and $3 billion dollars, you are in for a big surprise. Don't expect the rest of the state to pitch in and fund that monstrosity which will probably cost more like $10 billion. There are other alternatives which will not be explored as SNWA has blinders on and will not even investigate other alternatives. How sad.


    Report abuse

    RUSS wrote on February 02, 2008 06:19 AM: Lets see, Vegas Vic, those 120K homes probably house over 300K people. Which is 15% of the residents. Unless you and 299,999 others want to move out of the valley we will need the water. Looks like you use the same fuzzy math George Bush does when he cuts his taxes to balance the budget.


    Report abuse

    Vegas Vic wrote on February 02, 2008 03:34 AM: I don't see the advantage of the SNWA building a $2 to $3 billion dollar pipeline if it's only going to support 120K homes a year. There are 2 million people in this valley and I'm quite sure they don't all live in just 120K homes. Mulroy and her goon squad want to blow all that money to support only approximately 6% of the valley's residents. What about the needs of the other 94%?