Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


PROJECT CALLED 'BOONDOGGLE': Opposition heard to water pipeline

Las Vegas input mostly favors plan

Lincoln County officials, tribal leaders and federal agencies have dropped their protests to a proposed pipeline that would feed groundwater to Las Vegas from eastern Nevada.

But don't mistake that for widespread support for the project.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • The Southern Nevada Water Authority's pipeline network still faces loud opposition from rural residents and environmental activists.

    That was evident on Friday, when critics got the chance to weigh in on the plan at a state hearing on the Lincoln County segment of the pipeline.

    "I've been here all my life, and I resent Las Vegas coming up here and making decisions for us that are going to affect our daily lives," said Caliente resident Dorothy Woodworth Ray.

    Dr. Tom Sanders in Ely called the pipeline "the biggest public boondoggle this country has ever seen. It's going to make the Oklahoma Dust Bowl look like it never happened."

    Harlan Arnold, who used to measure snow accumulations for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in the mountains around Ely, said Southern Nevada has enough water to meet its current needs.

    "They want this water for future development. It's a real estate game," he said.

    A number of people called on the water authority to abandon the pipeline and pursue desalinated Pacific Ocean water.

    Authority officials plan to do both, but they claim a large-scale desalination effort is too complicated and expensive to address the community's water needs in the short term.

    Delaine Spilsbury said the water being sought in Lincoln and White Pine counties exists only in "the mystical underground lake in Ms. Mulroy's water dreams," a reference to water authority chief Pat Mulroy.

    "What foolishness prompts a person to try to take water from a dry lake?" she said.

    The Nevada Division of Water Resources accepted the input from the site of its hearing in Carson City and by video link from Caliente, Ely and the Sawyer Building in Las Vegas.

    State Engineer Tracy Taylor, who leads the division, will use testimony from the hearing and other information to decide how much groundwater, if any, the authority should be allowed to pump from three Lincoln County aquifers.

    The authority is requesting a total of 35,000 acre-feet of water -- enough to supply almost 120,000 homes -- from Cave Valley, Dry Lake Valley and Delamar Valley, which lie in Lincoln County.

    The water would be pumped to Las Vegas through a pipeline extending into White Pine County, some 250 miles away. The project is expected to cost well over $2 billion and could begin delivering water by 2015.

    Lincoln County dropped its official protests to the project in 2003, when commissioners there signed a water-sharing agreement with the authority.

    More protests were dropped this month when the authority struck deals with the Moapa Band of Paiute Indians, National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Bureau of Indian Affairs.

    Under those agreements, the authority agreed to a host of monitoring and mitigation measures designed to the protect the environment.

    The input from Las Vegas was very different. Nearly all of the 35 people in attendance said they favor the pipeline. Danny Thompson from the AFL-CIO and Andy Fegley from the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce said the water is needed to fuel the valley's economy and, by extension, the economy of the entire state.

    The two men submitted letters of support for the project from various unions, developers, and prominent valley leaders including Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman and Jim Rogers, chancellor of Nevada's university system.

    Launce Rake from the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada was one of only two people to speak out against the project from Las Vegas.

    "In all my work as a reporter and now an activist, I have yet to meet a single independent scientist who has looked closely at these plans and who doesn't think they will have a significant, deleterious impact. Not one," said Rake, who used to cover water issues for the Las Vegas Sun.

    The water hearing began on Monday. The authority is expected to wrap up its testimony early next week, and environmental attorney Simeon Herskovits will present the opposition case after that.

    The hearing is slated to conclude Friday, but it might wrap up early. The state engineer will accept written public input through Feb. 29.

    Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean @reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0350.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    From Rural Nevada wrote on January 17, 2009 08:46 AM: "The input from Las Vegas was very different. Nearly all the 35 people in attendance say they favor the pipeline." Well, DUH, why not favor something that only has benefits for you!!! Screw the rural counties as they are expendable??? Well, this "project" still has a long way to go as we in the rural counties are NOT going to go down without a fight.


    Report abuse

    WaterSource wrote on February 10, 2008 06:11 AM: Nevada & SNWA have refused to investigate a new fresh water Source that can TRIPLE Nevada's water resources and at the same time SAVE the SNWA maybe as much as a BILLION Dollars !

    It is simply not necessary to risk destroying the ground water resources and the environment when there is a viable ALTERNATIVE that has been GUARANTEED to yield ONE MILLION acre feet each year of fresh water for Nevada without harm to the environment or the water rights of anyone, anywhere !

    Nevada & the SNWA would rather DIE (Deny, Ignore & Evade) than communicate with someone who can lead them to ample fresh water.

    The same can be said for those who oppose SNWA's pipeline ! They too have been duly notified that such a vast natural resource does in fact exist and should be investigated as an alternative...or at the very least, as a stand-by alternative should the expected damage occur !

    Nevada is a gambling state....does anyone in authority care to make a bet that the Source is real ? If so, communicate....if not continue with your plans to "rob Peter to pay Paul" !

    Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) waterrdw@yahoo.com


    Report abuse

    Vegas Vic wrote on February 09, 2008 05:18 PM: Thompson has put his useless 2 cents worth in before and it's still the same garbage. Las Vegas doesn't need to pump the rural counties dry to exist as it is now. The developers want the SNWA Goon Squad to back them up on the "growth" of Las Vegas. We don't need growth. We need regulation of growth. If the water we currently have isn't enough to support more people, then it's time to limit or restrict growth. Instead, Mulroy and her SNWA Goon Squad, along with some union puke think it's better to destroy the rural counties. Their reasoning? There aren't that many people living there.


    Report abuse

    WaterSource wrote on February 09, 2008 04:32 PM: The Boondoggle is that neither side will investigate a NEW SOURCE that has been GUARANTEED to yield ONE MILLION ACRE FEET of FRESH WATER each year for Nevada without damage to the environment or the water rights of anyone, anywhere ! Can SNWA guarantee the same ? An insurance policy backed up with fresh water might be a thought...

    NV chose a long time ago to have pity parties, wring their hands in despair and proclaim, “woe is us” rather than communicate with someone who can lead NV to a legitimate NEW fresh water SOURCE.

    Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) waterrdw@yahoo.com


    Report abuse

    outlander wrote on February 09, 2008 09:13 AM: What happened to my comment? It was under 300 words.


    Report abuse

    outlander wrote on February 09, 2008 09:11 AM: A consideration I'd like to hear about more often is the difference in recharge, when the water is used locally for crops, livestock, wildlife, even lawns and gardens and golf courses, as compared to the much lesser recharge rate when so much water is piped away to an even hotter desert in Las Vegas. Where's the catchment basin going to be? Vegas, I assume. Open air? Into Lake Mead.
    As Dean Baker and others have reported, springs are already drying up with agricultural pumping. Yet agricultural pumping discharges the water back into the ground, especially with the newer sprinkler systems. A portion returns to the water table. Wouldn't happen at all if it's piped to Las Vegas.
    Going through Lincoln County on 93, the open air reservoir and greening up landscape, being watered by sprinklers of the wrong kind, is an example of bad practices, optimizing evaporation. I wonder what's happening to the wells and springs in Caliente, Alamo, and Panaca, among others?
    Driving up the California coast, I noticed that many of the vegetable crops were not only sprinklered low to the ground, but tented.
    It's appalling to me that our federal land and native peoples agencies have made deals with Las Vegas. Las Vegas won't honor those deals if the expected water 1) isn't there, 2) isn't recharged at the usual rate, and SNWA 3) can't afford to stop taking the water, once they have it, and 4) adverse environmental effects are too severe to be mitigated by the measures SNWA has a agreed to.


    Report abuse

    2zero wrote on February 09, 2008 07:58 AM: Hey the SNWA will "host" a monitoring site.....the fox (Pat) will protect the hen house. When Las Vegas is dependent on the water do you think for a second that anyone will plug the pipe when birds, snakes and cows are dead? By then it will be too late....for all the money SNWA spends promoting the environmental bent it is supposed to have (The Springs Preserve) how ironic the Springs are dry and "the meadows" that were once "las vegas" are gone!!!!