Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Study gives 50-50 odds Lake Mead will dry up by 2021

The largest man-made reservoir in North America and the source of 90 percent of Southern Nevada's water supply could be sucked dry by overuse and climate change in 13 years or less, a new study warns.

The report unveiled Tuesday by the University of California-San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography places Lake Mead's chances of running dry by 2021 at 50 percent, better than your odds of winning at any casino.

According to Scripps researchers, there is also a 50 percent chance that reservoir levels will fall low enough to shut down power generation at Hoover Dam by 2017, and a 10 percent chance the lake could be dry by 2014.

But the study's co-author, Tim Barnett, said those doomsday dates aren't as important as the overall message.


Most Popular Stories
  • SEX IN LIBRARY! SAY IT AIN'T SO
  • NORM: Dara Torres' ex still seems bitter
  • NORM: Curtain falls on flying body parts
  • NORM: Health put little damper on Carlin
  • SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES: As rates rise, exec pay soars
  • EXCOMMUNICATION: Mormons expel LV man
  • Officer in deadly crash held; tests reveal marijuana in blood
  • TAKEN FOR A BUS RIDE
  • LAUGHLIN RIVER RUN MELEE: Fugitive biker surrenders
  • A Well-Earned Break



  • "The point is this is coming in 10 years, not 20 or 30 or 40. We're looking it in the face now," said Barnett, a research marine physicist who wrote the paper with climate scientist David Pierce.

    Their work is the latest -- and among the most specific -- in a line of studies predicting drier conditions and mounting water shortages across the Southwest as a result of climate change.

    The peer-reviewed paper titled "When Will Lake Mead Go Dry?" will be published later this year in the journal Water Resources Research.

    More than 20 million people, including nearly everyone in the Las Vegas Valley, depend on water from Lake Mead.

    The study assumes that by 2050 the Colorado River will experience a 10 to 30 percent drop in the amount of runoff it receives from snow that falls and melts on the western slope of the Rocky Mountains.

    If that occurs and water use continues at its present level, the chances become "vanishingly small" that Lake Mead and its upstream twin, Lake Powell, will ever refill, Barnett said.

    But not everyone agrees with his conclusions.

    Terry Fulp is area manager of Boulder Canyon Operations for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, which oversees water deliveries and hydropower output at Hoover Dam.

    Fulp puts the chances of Lake Mead running dry at almost zero, namely because the federal government and the seven states that share the Colorado would never let that happen.

    "In my lifetime, I don't expect to ever see it," he said. "It isn't in anyone's interest to see Lake Mead drained down to dead pool."

    Southern Nevada Water Authority officials declined to comment on any of the report's specific findings because they have yet to read the document.

    Generally speaking, though, authority spokesman Scott Huntley said the paper raises some important issues.

    "I think that same concern is shared by all the states in the Colorado River system. That was really the genesis for the shared-shortage agreements that were signed by the secretary of the Interior and the seven states in December," Huntley said.

    Those new guidelines spell out a series of increasing shortages each state must take as Lake Mead falls toward a surface elevation of 1,000 feet above sea level.

    It also requires another round of negotiations among the seven states as the lake approaches the 1,025 mark. From those talks will come "a more difficult plan" for managing the shrinking river, Huntley said.

    Farms will almost certainly bear the brunt of that second round of shortage talks, since 80 percent of the water diverted from the Colorado goes to crops, not cities.

    "It's not just urban conservation that's needed. We need to conserve it across the spectrum of all water uses," Huntley said. "The problem is one that is going to strike very, very hard at agriculture in California and Arizona."

    Barnett said the shortage guidelines actually prompted the Scripps study because the new rules for the river failed to address the impacts of climate change.

    As a result, the agreed-upon shortages will buy water managers no more than a couple of years, he said. "It's going to do nothing."

    Fulp said a panel of climate scientists did weigh in on the guidelines before they were signed. The problem is with the climate change models themselves, which range wildly when it comes to the river, he said.

    Some models point to increased flow, while others predict runoff to decline by as much as 40 percent.

    Rather than "just pick a number" to represent the impact of climate change, Fulp said architects of the new shortage guidelines opted to plan for a general increase in the variability on the Colorado.

    Ultimately, he said there is nothing new about the findings in the Scripps study. Such "doom and gloom" predictions have been circulating for years now.

    "Given his assumptions, I won't quibble with his conclusions," Fulp said of Barnett. "I think the real question is, are these the right assumptions?"

    The surface of Lake Mead has dropped almost 100 vertical feet since 1999. It now stands at 1,117 feet above sea level, its lowest level since 1965, when water was withheld upstream to fill Lake Powell for the first time.

    Without new turbines, Hoover Dam can't generate electricity once the reservoir drops below 1,050 feet.

    Elevation 895 is considered "dead pool," when the water is too low to be released through the dam without the use of pumps.

    Roughly 2 million acre-feet of water would remain in the lake at that point, but only the Southern Nevada Water Authority would have access to it thanks to a new intake pipe now being planned.

    The so-called third straw, slated for completion in 2012, will draw water from the old river channel at the deepest part of the lake.

    "This probably underscores why we need to be in front of the state engineer like we are today, asking permission to draw upon unused, available supplies of groundwater that are separate and apart from the Colorado River," Huntley said.

    Authority officials are in the midst of a two-week state hearing on their plans to tap groundwater across Eastern Nevada and pipe it to Las Vegas.

    Critics of the multibillion-dollar project argue that the water cannot be removed safely from rural Clark, Lincoln and White Pine counties -- areas that are just as susceptible to drought and climate change as the Colorado is.

    Barnett said his findings cast doubt on the ability of Las Vegas, and the Southwest as a whole, to grow at anywhere close to the present pace.

    "You have to ask yourself, do you have the water? This is where the word sustainability comes in," he said.

    "Smarter people than me will have to give you the answer to that. I can at least raise the question."

    Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal.com or (702) 383-0350.



    Leave Your Comment 36 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Get Real wrote on February 15, 2008 01:42 AM: Walk Away is right on. Throw in some solar panels along the way to help generate the energy requirements and can the morons who think a multi-billion dollar pipeline to drain underground water is the solution.


    Gene Richards wrote on February 14, 2008 07:45 PM: On the 50-50 odds Lake Mead will dry up by 2021 article.
    The Lake Mead Recreation area should be changed to the Lake Mead Disaster area single handedly created by Pat Mulroy just to satisfy the greed of the developers in the area. Will she ever stand up and say that’s enough. The people in this valley does not deserver this. Will Ms. Mulroy still be here when the rest of us are scratching for water? I doubt it. She will probable pack up and leave with the developers. She should have, at very least try prevent this from happening to the people in this valley. She never lifted a hand to prevent this situation.
    Are we in this situation because of the militia millionaire developers greasing the palms of our irresponsible representatives??? They have known the lake was not going to last with the rapid growth in the valley for past 20 to 30 years. They kept trying to tell us we’re in a drought, but believe it or not people, we live in a desert.
    Boulder City is the only city in the area that stood up the developers and put a moratorium on their city. To bad the repetitive of Henderson, Las Vegas, and No Las Vegas weren’t responsible enough to do the same for the residents of the valley.
    What are we going to do now? Stand by and wait for the SNWA drain water from another area and put it in the same situation we’re in?


    Walk Away wrote on February 13, 2008 11:44 PM: Scripps Institute is very credible and if they say there's a 50% chance we're at T-12 years right now and 10% chance we're at T-6 years, then we need to jack our gaming tax to be 50% of national average (increase of 25%) and use the money to build a canal going to our own DESALINIZATION PLANT located off the coast of Seal Beach. Yes, we can build a monorail along side the canal at the same time and it would run right through the new Anaheim Resort Corridor (aka Disneyland/California Adventure). The new financial partners in City Center have the blueprints for the plant and if we're really 6-12 years from having to relocate 3 million people, then EPA will grant us a waiver.


    TimeRanger wrote on February 13, 2008 11:12 PM: "John wrote on February 13, 2008 08:16 AM:
    lake mead was at its highest ever level in 2000..."

    John, you better send your crystal ball out for cleaning - Mead hit 1229 feet in '83 - that is when there was a SOLID 6 feet of water going over the spillways.


    tim wrote on February 13, 2008 05:38 PM: does anybody think this study might have been made with a little help. maybe something to do with the pipeline our so called leaders want? its possible.


    D-Day wrote on February 13, 2008 04:12 PM: A dry Lake Mead would be awesome! Just think of the stuff you'd find on the barren floor. Wallets, jewelry, all kinds of crap that fell off boats and sunk. Hell, I'm sure their is a few bodies floating around out there too. I hope to get their first when it happens!


    Roc Doc wrote on February 13, 2008 03:14 PM: I think this is just another scare-tactic shot-in-the-dark guess at the future based on intentionally dire assumptions. We've been in a 10-year drought, and when it's over the lake will refill. They have not attempted to remove the drought from the equation, but simply assume it's part of a long-term "global warming." Baloney. This kind of drought comes around periodically, and always ends. Big deal. This one is already on its way out. Beware the fearmonger.


    Tom wrote on February 13, 2008 02:39 PM: Even now, electricity generation at Hoover Dam is throttled back in an effort to conserve water. Since less water is flowing through the inlets, some of the generators are just sitting idle and not being used. That difference in kilowatts has to be made up by running the coal-fired generators longer and harder, and that adds to global warming. Once you realize a typical coal-fired generator burns 10,000 tons of coal a day, equal to 100 coal cars a day, you can begin to understand the inter-relatedness of these complex issues.


    the dodger wrote on February 13, 2008 02:18 PM: I'm sure there ase people who will dispute this report but to me it is just another warning sign that this city is going down the toilet. How many negative things have to happen here before people realize the future of this city is in jeopardy. We have a massive buildup of homes for sale, yet continue to allow builders to build more. We base our economic stability on a gaming and tourism industry that doesnt give a hoot about the residents who live here. So let's keep building and not enforcing water restrictions and take our chances, yeah go idea.


    Steve wrote on February 13, 2008 01:59 PM: Timeranger,

    Thier model is based on he assumption that the annaul snowpack will be 20-30% under average. Also, this study did not include any potential "ear-marking".

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20080213-9999-1n13mead.html

    "On a positive note, snowfall along the river system has been recorded at 128 percent of normal this year, which will add 3.5 million acre-feet to Lake Powell and Lake Mead if the rest of the season stays bountiful, said Roger Patterson, who tracks Colorado River issues for the Metropolitan Water District"

    I'm simply trying to state that the data for this year has already flawed thier data model. There are other models out there that actually show increase in water flows.


    Read All Comments