Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


DOE probing prohibited documents in database

It's not clear just what problem is

WASHINGTON -- Department of Energy internal inspectors are investigating DOE document-handling within the Yucca Mountain program, according to a federal official.

It has not been made clear what was being investigated.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • U.S. HIGHWAY 95 CRASH: Longtime LV officer mourned
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • NORM: At last, Ripa gets her wedding cake
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • ANOTHER SOMBER DAY: Fourth officer in short span dies




  • The probe was disclosed in a recent report circulated within the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    The NRC hosts the electronic library of Yucca Mountain documents that are pertinent to the Energy Department's bid for a license to build a nuclear waste repository in Nevada.

    A Jan. 25 report from library administrator Dan Graser said the NRC was informed the Energy Department inspector general was investigating the discovery of "prohibited access, non-official business documents" submitted by DOE for the database.

    Contacted Friday, Graser declined to discuss what was found or what was being investigated.

    "As far as I know, it is still ongoing within the DOE IG office," Graser said of the probe.

    A spokeswoman for Inspector General Gregory Friedman said she would not confirm or deny the report.

    Ward Sproat, director of the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management that runs the Yucca project, said Monday he was unaware of any document investigation.

    Sproat said he met with Friedman on Thursday on other matters, "and he mentioned absolutely nothing about it."

    The electronic library, called the licensing support network, contains more than 3.5 million documents pertaining to the proposed nuclear waste repository about 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

    Attorneys for the state of Nevada have complained to the NRC that the database is "enormously bloated" with multiple copies of documents, empty e-mails, clearly obsolete content and employee personal e-mails.

    Graser said the investigation is unrelated to that content.

    "It is none of that stuff," he said. "Those are not the sorts of things the inspector general investigates."

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or (202) 783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    ron wrote on February 21, 2008 12:33 PM: This is quite a piece of journalism. The second sentence says: "It has not been made clear what was being investigated." This is followed up by several mentions of people who were unable to comment or were unaware of the issue. And so the story goes on for 14 paragraphs, with not a shred of content introduced! Impressive writing, and fascinating reading.