Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

News


Nuke industry seeks storage sites

Yucca uncertainty prompts campaign

WASHINGTON -- With uncertainties swirling around the proposed Nevada radioactive waste site, the nuclear industry has mounted a campaign to court communities that might be willing to host interim storage of its used fuel.

Officials with the Nuclear Energy Institute are meeting with governors, state legislators and other elected leaders, including those in states where nuclear waste has remained for years at decommissioned power plants, NEI executive Marshall Cohen said Friday.

Talks are moving forward with two or three communities, and more sites are expected to show interest, said Cohen, NEI senior director for state and local government affairs.

Cohen did not identify the communities during a presentation but said some were among the 11 sites that at one time volunteered to host a nuclear waste reprocessing plant for the government. Those were in New Mexico, Washington, Idaho, Illinois, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio and South Carolina.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Larson tells a tale of dating Clooney
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • HENDERSON FATAL SHOOTING: Witnesses rebut police
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING IN HENDERSON: Witnesses testify woman had knife
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas



  • In the next month or so, he said, NEI will guide local leaders on a nuclear plant tour focused on showing them how utilities are keeping spent fuel stored on above-ground pads and in steel and concrete casks, similar to how an interim storage site would be configured.

    "We are going to take them to interim storage, to walk around it, touch it, taste it, talk to the people who run it," Cohen said.

    After that, "if they still want to talk and get serious, then we can start looking at putting things on the table."

    Cohen spoke at a conference of the Energy Communities Alliance, local governments that interact with Department of Energy laboratories and former weapons plants.

    The NEI campaign underscores the industry's determination to show progress on removing spent fuel from reactor sites, an issue that could slow the proclaimed "renaissance" of new nuclear power plant construction.

    It also reflects the industry's shift on the much-delayed Yucca Mountain Project. Where once burial in the proposed Nevada repository was held up as the solution for thousands of tons of spent fuel piling up in reinforced containers outside reactors, now NEI advocates a broader policy that also includes advancing nuclear fuel processing and interim storage.

    "What we are willing to do is put an entire industry behind the effort," Cohen said of locating volunteers to hold onto nuclear waste until it can be moved to Yucca Mountain or to a reprocessing plant.

    If NEI can recruit one or more volunteer sites, "it can be very, very helpful in the long run for the utilities to be able to answer the inevitable question, 'What about the waste?'" Cohen said.

    "We can say short term we have a path to interim storage and long term we are going to have other things happen in the country," he said.

    Energy Department leaders have discouraged talk of interim nuclear waste storage, where potential hosts are expected to run into legal, technical and political challenges like those that confronted the consortium that tried to establish a storage site on the Goshute Indian reservation in Utah.

    Ward Sproat, director of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, has testified to Congress that by the time a temporary storage site is located, built and opened for business, Yucca Mountain would be close to finished.

    "They are much better judges of the timetable than us, but we think it makes sense to move on this," Cohen said in response on Friday.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or (202) 783-1760.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Impeach Harry wrote on February 26, 2008 08:09 AM: Vic: Ronald Reagan undid Carter's ban on reprocessing... Bill Clinton re-established it... And then, George W. Bush canceled the ban again.

    At this time, pursuing reprocessing in the private sector is a matter of economics. (Although, the Gov't does have some things brewing behind the scenes...)

    Pluto Boy: Wake Up!!! As if Oil is a "fair" industry to the taxpayer. We need to increase the use of nuclear to get away from foreign oil. GNEP is only a start to energy independence.


    Pluto Boy wrote on February 24, 2008 07:31 AM: We are geared up in South Carolina and ready to fight plans to dump spent fuel here. The whole GNEP proposal is nothing short of a scheme by the plutonium industry to rob money from the tax payers, as been the case in every country which uses reprocessing. It's an industry that can only survive with massive subsidies by big government; private industry won't put up a penny for this failed and dirty technology.


    Vegas Vic wrote on February 23, 2008 03:10 AM: There wouldn't BE a need for a large storage facility if Congress would have gotten off its inflated rear end and negated President Carter's ban on building breeder reactors. France and several countries in Europe have been using breeder reactors since 1967 to process the spent fuel rods from their reactors. Out of 100% of the waste coming in, only 4% remains as waste. The other 96% is returned to the reactor facilities, fully "revitalized" and ready to continue generating electric power. If the United States had built breeder reactors, there would NOT be the need for a huge central storage facility. The miniscule amount of waste could be retained at the generating facility.