Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


POLITICAL NOTEBOOK: Hitler quip misread, aides say

Likening Nazis' 'big lies' to utilities' tactics draws ire

In putting the coal-power industry in the same sentence as Adolf Hitler, Harry Reid didn't mean to suggest the utilities are as bad as the Nazis -- just that they act like them.

"I never said they were as bad as Hitler," the senator said in an interview last week. "I said what they're doing is creating the big lie that coal is clean, and that's not true. That (tactic) goes back to the Nazi era, and I'm not saying they're following anything to do with the Nazis, but that's where it started."


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • The topic was raised by a comment Reid made to the Las Vegas Sun in a piece that was posted on the newspaper's Web site on Tuesday.

    The Nevada Democrat said the industry was making its case on the basis of "the old Hitler lie: when you say things long enough, people start believing them."

    Hitler, in "Mein Kampf," accused the Jews of telling falsehoods so outrageous that people figured they had to be true, because no one would make up something so outlandish. He said this clever tactic was more effective than "little" lies that people could easily discount.

    Colloquially, the phrase is often used to mean what Reid said it did, that repetition can create the appearance of truth. But by invoking Hitler specifically, he threatened to trivialize the horrific events of the Holocaust, said Phyllis Friedman, Nevada director of the Anti-Defamation League.

    "Once again, a public figure has inappropriately invoked the Nazis to make a political point," she said. "This is offensive to the victims of the murderous Nazis and debases the currency of political discussion. Whatever the passions of politics and policy, it is important for officials to avoid these comparisons, which obscure the difference between genocidal behavior and mere political differences."

    At the same time as Reid and his aides were insisting his remark was an innocuous, factual historical reference that only the wildest imagination could possibly consider inflammatory, they went into overdrive behind the scenes, perhaps practiced by now in reacting to their boss putting his foot in his mouth.

    Within hours of Reid being asked about the Hitler remark, Reid staffers provided a reporter with names and phone numbers of Reid-friendly Las Vegas Jewish leaders and suggested they be interviewed.

    In case that wasn't proactive enough, a Washington-based spokesman for AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, dialed the newsroom himself to recite a prepared statement.

    "Harry Reid is a true friend of the pro-Israel community and a real leader on issues important to a strong U.S.-Israel relationship," Josh Block said. "Senator Reid's longstanding and extremely warm relationship with the Jewish community in Nevada and the pro-Israel community nationwide is a testament to his commitment to the values that bind America as a nation."

    Asked to comment on Reid's statement about Hitler, Block said he didn't know what Reid had said. He'd just heard the senator needed defending.

    FAILURE TO LAUNCH

    Continuing Political Notebook's behind-the-scenes look at media management, a news conference last week provided a good lesson in how not to roll out a campaign.

    A representative of Democratic candidate Andrew Martin, who is seeking the nomination in the 3rd Congressional District, left a message on this reporter's voice mail that there would be a campaign launch event in front of the Lloyd D. George Federal Building downtown (which is not in the district).

    The message said a press release was going out to inform the media of the event, scheduled for noon Wednesday. No call-back number was left.

    No press release ever arrived, but a Review-Journal photographer arrived at the appointed time and place nonetheless. Martin is considered a long shot against Robert Daskas, who has the backing of the Democratic establishment, but he has put together a substantial campaign operation and the paper wanted to treat him fairly.

    Alas, there was no news conference to be found at noon Wednesday in front of the federal building.

    Reached later in the week, Martin's campaign manager, Joe Bifano, insisted the event had been held. Bifano said he stood in front of the federal building for less than five minutes, but gave up when "nobody from the media was there." Martin, he said, had been down the street in a coffee shop making campaign phone calls.

    In any case, Martin put out a press release last May announcing the "launch" of his campaign. Bifano said last week's event was meant to call attention to Martin's candidacy in advance of Saturday's Democratic county convention, at which the campaign operated a booth.

    Martin also spoke at the convention, which ended up being called off because of irregularities. But he received so little attention that the crowd didn't even take notice when he criticized the man he hopes to run against in the general election, Rep. Jon Porter.

    "You're supposed to boo," Martin instructed the crowd when he got no reaction to the name.

    According to the Federal Election Commission, Martin has collected about $56,000 in donations. Bifano said Martin, an accountant, has also put about $80,000 of his own cash into the effort.

    Just three of the donations to Martin, not counting his own, have come from Nevadans. Bifano dismissed the idea that might indicate a lack of local support.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball @reviewjournal.com or (702) 387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 21 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    BC wrote on February 26, 2008 07:14 AM: Don't waste a vote? That's priceless!!! What gives you the idea I'm liberal, conservative, or otherwise? How about painfully pragmatic, fed up with the 2 party system, and willing to cast a vote to prove it? If another 3rd party candidate declares his/her candidacy, I'll investigate them. But until then, I'll vote, and not for either party! If more people were brave enough to do so, the house of cards would crumble.

    WHY DON"T YOU NOT WASTE YOUR VOTE?????


    tim wrote on February 25, 2008 05:57 PM: the dems should talk about saying something long enough, its all about wmd,s its all about wmd,s.............


    David Johann wrote on February 25, 2008 05:41 PM: Wanna know one of the biggest Big Lies ever told? Big, I mean BIG! Two words:

    "Clean Coal."


    UNLVStud wrote on February 25, 2008 05:17 PM: Why aren't more people outraged about Big Coal wanting to destroy our environment and our State?

    Tons of water we don't have is needed to run these plants. The carbon they emit is cleaner than decades ago, but it's still hurting the environment. Coal is not the solution.

    Incentives need to be developed to make solar, wind, and geo-thermal power more readily available. Long-term, sustainable energy is what is needed.

    Big-Coal is the self-serving obstructionist to these emerging technologies. Why invest in the future when you can make huge profits doing more of the same environment polluting it always has.

    Hooray for Harry!


    Don't waste a vote wrote on February 25, 2008 03:41 PM: There is no way Nader is a liberal, he knows he won't win - he splits the vote.


    BC wrote on February 25, 2008 10:56 AM: It's all a big lie. Civilized society, political correctness, war on terror, compassionate conservative, progressive leadership, global warming, good government, the list continues ad infinitum.

    The truth as I see it is, we're all animals, not some self-anointed godlike benevolent creatures. The good need very little government. The bad is patently un-governable. When we forget this simple fact, we get what we have now- the ugly. And all sorts of characters vying for our attention in their attempts to attain glory- that is, our consent to their governance.

    For the first time, I'm considering Ralph Nader for president. For not only his true distance from "special interests" but his distance from partisanship. Take that R/D party card, fold it up, stick it someplace you'll forget, and send an independent to Washington to do our bidding until he's either corrupted or martyred. Just once, to see what happens. It might actually be interesting.


    2zero wrote on February 25, 2008 10:01 AM: "clean coal" or "black lung"?
    Coal is what bad kids get at Christmas. Next you will be buying "pristine petroleum"...idiots!


    Russ wrote on February 25, 2008 08:05 AM: Man what a bunch of idiots. Harry isn't half the self serving, dictatorial moron that Bush is. Thank God is destruction of the United States and his self serving reign is nearing its end.


    David Johann wrote on February 25, 2008 08:03 AM: Stop picking on Nevada Power and big coal, Harry!

    Leave Nevada Power and big coal al-o-o-o-o-ne!


    Jiim wrote on February 25, 2008 07:41 AM: I bet Harry can relate to Hitler.


    Read All Comments