Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Judge tries his hand at one-liners, quips

Despite accusations, Del Vecchio campaigns for seat

At a recent campaign event in Las Vegas, Judge Nicholas Del Vecchio appeared to be auditioning for a spot on the "Late Show with David Letterman" instead of his seat in Family Court. He fired off one-liners and quips during his brief appearance, earning a few laughs from the dozen or so people who attended.

"I once did a Supreme Court brief for an Egg McMuffin," he said.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say




  • The attempts at humor continued.

    When one of his friends in the back of the room began talking, Del Vecchio shouted: "Are you listening? I'll hold you in contempt."

    Del Vecchio, 50, however, faces some serious civil charges.

    A former judicial assistant, who also was his stepdaughter, has accused the judge of sexually abusing her when she was 14. In a complaint filed with the Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission on Feb. 8, the woman also accused Del Vecchio of taking nude photos of her from age 14 to 16.

    When the woman, Rebeccah Murray, later worked for Del Vecchio, she said he coerced her into having sex with him when she was in her 20s.

    Other staff members also complained about Del Vecchio's behavior, saying he made racist remarks and directed a former bailiff who had a part-time job with a commercial airline to get him free airline tickets, according to the complaint.

    Those accusations haven't stopped Del Vecchio, who denies the allegations, from campaigning to retain his seat in Family Court's Department K. But he didn't address the accusations during the Feb. 23 campaign forum, hosted by Veterans in Politics and held at the Marine Corps League Leatherneck Club.

    During the event, a panel of veterans asked questions of dozens of judicial candidates. The candidates didn't take questions from the audience.

    When asked if he was a man of high morals and professionalism, Del Vecchio replied with a simple "yes."

    Steve Sanson, president of Veterans in Politics, shot back: "A short answer for a long-winded judge."

    Del Vecchio was first elected to the Family Court bench in 2000 after losing seven earlier tries. He has drawn three opponents: family law attorneys Ellen Bezian, Cynthia Giuliani and Vincent Ochoa. Bezian and Ochoa took part in the campaign event.

    Sanson later said Del Vecchio didn't want to take part in the forum if the veterans panel grilled him on the accusations. Sanson said he agreed not to ask any questions related to the judicial discipline complaint in return for Del Vecchio's participation.

    Del Vecchio's judicial executive assistant, Sharon Phelps, disputed Sanson's account. She said there was never an agreement between Del Vecchio and Sanson restricting the type of questions asked during the forum. But according to an e-mail Phelps sent to Sanson before the campaign event, she made it clear the judge wouldn't address the accusations.

    After speaking to the veterans, Del Vecchio stood outside the club with a man he identified as his bailiff. The "bailiff" wasn't wearing a uniform but was armed with a handgun and Taser.

    Del Vecchio wouldn't answer questions and had his bailiff speak for him. "He cannot speak about the situation," the bailiff said.

    Another judicial candidate facing serious charges, Elizabeth Halverson, also spoke at the campaign forum. Unlike Del Vecchio, she addressed the allegations head on.

    Halverson said she was removed from the bench because of petty personal grievances against her, not because she was incompetent.

    Sanson asked Halverson why she didn't run against Chief Judge Kathy Hardcastle. Hardcastle and Halverson are known to have a contentious relationship. Halverson once worked as a law clerk in District Court but was fired by Hardcastle.

    "I am the sitting judge in Department 23. So why would I give up my sitting seat to go after someone else over what? Petty vengeance?" she said. "This isn't about vengeance on my part."

    The Judicial Discipline Commission suspended Halverson from the bench with pay after allegations surfaced that she harassed employees, couldn't properly conduct criminal trials and improperly communicated with jurors, among other accusations. The Nevada Supreme Court upheld her suspension on Nov. 1.

    Halverson was elected in 2006. She served about 10 months before being suspended. She is being challenged by Family Court Judge Stefany Miley, who took a few shots at Halverson at the forum.

    "I know what you can and cannot do in the courtroom," Miley said. "I know who you can and cannot talk to during jury trials."

    Despite the criticism, Halverson remained upbeat after the forum.

    "All the charges are highly questionable," she said. "The public is very wise. They can see through a lot of this."

    Contact reporter David Kihara at dkihara@reviewjournal.com or (702) 380-1039.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 18 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    peter wrote on July 27, 2008 07:45 AM: These are people who have elected by the public. It is so sad, stop and think.


    Report abuse

    Casey wrote on March 01, 2008 11:10 PM: Bill, unfortunately until the case is unsealed no one will ever know what is about. So, what is she hiding and who was the friendly judge that sealed the case for her?

    Miley has not completed her current term in family court that she fought so hard for. It is suspected that the family court seat was just a way to get her foot in the door for this run.
    All orchestrated.

    The Rizzolo money was contributed in her campaign for family court. The name of the LLC is RicBar.


    Report abuse

    Bill wrote on March 01, 2008 09:59 PM: Casey,

    Interesting point! Thanks for bringing that to light. I do have to ask, if her court case is sealed, how can you view it? Is there a way to?


    Report abuse

    Guido wrote on March 01, 2008 07:33 PM: The Community of Las Vegas should take an aggressive step this election year and vote them all out. That's right no home run. And these Judges that are already sitting Judges and have announced their candidacy for new departments. Because those departments


    (thanks to the legislation) salaries will be higher. It's about greed not justice. Judge Miley couldn't take care of Family Court Dept. F. Check and see how many times the Honorable


    Senior Judge Terrance Marren sat in for her. I hope the District Court has a Baby Sitting service. And a nail salon close by. Her decisions are like magic. Flip your long blond hair over your shoulder and say, gee I'll get back to you on that. Doesn't much matter that your life is on hold while you wait for her decision. But, fortunately the Judges have TVs their Chambers. This so law clerks, and Secretaries can watch. And the Judge can rely on their opinions.





    Mr. Sanson please direct your group to research the candiates. Don't use the


    Newspapers or Media as a source.





    Check with the Judicial Comittee (the secret panel) to determine the number of complaints. It may be a secret!


    Or check with the NV State Bar for


    complaints. You will most likely have to dig deep to find the clean laundry.


    Report abuse

    delray wrote on March 01, 2008 02:21 PM: that sansoon is a wannabe lawyer, loser,, they guy does nothing but self promotion,,, hey sansoon how long can you live off this vet nonsense


    Report abuse

    politik wrote on March 01, 2008 01:16 PM: There is literally nothing more sickening than the state of the judiciary (particularly 8th district) all the way to the Supreme Court.
    Despite public corruption investigations into the actions of several members of the just us' (perhaps for reasons unbeknownst to them directly), the 'Discipline Committee' and corrupt officials (in conflicts of interest and collusion)..the cesspool bubbles on.

    I have to wonder where this Steve Sanson and his 'gang' is really coming from as there seems to be no real substance to the flag waving and in truth it is suspicious that anyone would endorse any judicial candidate in light of all that is going on without full disclosure as to why 'fair and balanced'

    Everything stinks where it comes to our judiciary.


    Report abuse

    Steve Sanson wrote on March 01, 2008 10:34 AM:



    New Announcement from the Veterans In Politics

    LIVE! Tuesday, March 4th from 9:00 - 10:00AM on KLAV AM 1230 Radio


    The Veterans In Politics International has been invited to announce the Judicial Endorsement Winners on the Solid Poy Hawaiian Talk Radio ”Faces of the Community” If you would like to participate, the Call in number is (702) 731-1230.

    We also would like to take this opportunity to thank all the judicial candidates that participated in the event this past Saturday.

    Each member of the Veterans In Politics wish all the judicial candidates the best of luck in their respective races.

    If you missed the event, you may also click onto these links and view and listen to the judicial interviews that were conducted on February 23rd:

    Audio: http://www.alltalkradio.net/vipjudges/

    Audio and Video: http://www.helloworld.com:80/members_myworld.aspx?ID=nevadavip&target=show

    The panel members of the Veterans In Politics that asked the questions are:

    Richard Harris
    Nicholas Starling
    Michael Lamb
    Michael Yepko
    Steve Sanson

    Thank you;
    Veterans In Politics International, Inc.
    Membership
    www.VeteransInPolitics.com
    PO BOX 28211
    LAS VEGAS, NV 89126


    Report abuse

    casey wrote on March 01, 2008 10:20 AM: Look at Mileys sealed court case before you vote. Also, ask about the money she accepted from a Rizzolo LLC

    Why would a candidate for judge take money from an LLC run by a convicted
    racketeer.


    Report abuse

    casey wrote on March 01, 2008 10:18 AM: Look at Mileys sealed court case before you vote. Also, ask about the money she accepted from a Rizzolo LLC


    Report abuse

    GOT NEWS FOR YOU wrote on March 01, 2008 10:16 AM: You think these two are bad, you haven't seen anyhting till MILEY gets in there.

    You want Halverson out? Fine, find a suitable replacement. Miley is worse than both of these two put together.


    Read All Comments