Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

News


FRAUD, CONSPIRACY TRIAL: Gage case results in mistrial

Jury couldn't reach verdict after week of deliberating

A federal judge declared a mistrial Tuesday in the fraud and conspiracy case against personal injury attorney Noel Gage after jurors, who deliberated for one week, announced they could not reach a unanimous verdict.

Senior U.S. District Judge Justin Quackenbush dismissed the jurors in the early afternoon and, in an attempt not to taint future jurors on the case, asked them not to speak to the media. Although the judge does not have the authority to bar the jurors from commenting after they are released, the jury complied with his request.

Gage's defense team also declined comment.

U.S. Attorney Gregory Brower said he respected jurors' hard work over the five days, but was disappointed they could not reach a guilty verdict.


Most Popular Stories
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • NORM: Owner Jay-Z says 40/40 Club is fine
  • JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Panel suspends Halverson
  • Experience Ending
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas
  • NORM: Cruise the object of a twin crush



  • "We are confident in the case against this defendant and we look forward to a retrial," Brower said.

    Quackenbush will set a new trial date during a telephone conference with attorneys Monday.

    The federal government claimed Gage, 69, belonged to a network of Las Vegas doctors and personal injury attorneys who conspired with self-proclaimed medical consultant Howard Awand to inflate clients' medical costs, protect doctors from medical malpractice lawsuits and share kickbacks from legal settlements.

    They referred clients with seemingly solid legal claims to one another, keeping the scam alive and the money flowing, according to prosecutors.

    Awand is the only other alleged participant in the network to be indicted so far, although attorneys representing other doctors and lawyers mentioned in the investigation frequented the courtroom during Gage's trial.

    Awand is scheduled to go to trial in the fall.

    A Las Vegas defense attorney said the split in the deliberation room is significant. Because Quackenbush asked the jurors not to speak to reporters or attorneys on either side, it is unclear on what charges they were hung or how many jurors wanted a guilty verdict versus a decision of innocence.

    "If there are three or four on the defense side, the government doesn't like to see that," said the attorney, who asked that his name not be used. "If there is a sole holdout, Gage has a major problem."

    The attorney said if there is one holdout who prevents the jury from making a unanimous decision, it could be because that juror somehow relates or identifies with the defendant.

    The day the jury retired to the deliberation room, Quackenbush tossed out 13 counts against Gage, which attorneys said is not uncommon. The jury was left to focus on one matter: the treatment of Melodie Simon. Simon underwent routine back surgery in 2000 and ended up paralyzed after a sac protecting her spine was punctured, allowing blood to push nerves against the spine.

    She hired Gage to determine what caused her paralysis and to file a lawsuit against whomever was responsible. Gage initially told Simon that he could secure a judgment between $8 million and $10 million.

    Ultimately, Simon received a $2.3 million settlement. After attorneys fees and costs, she received $1.3 million, an amount that she testified would never cover the cost of her medical needs.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Schiess told jurors the amount of the settlement plummeted when Gage entered the conspiracy with Awand without Simon's knowledge. Schiess said Gage backed off surgeons Dr. Mark Kabins and Dr. John Thalgott, who operated on Simon, because they were "Awand's boys." Gage feared that he would lose lucrative referrals if he angered Awand, Schiess said.

    Gage's strategy on Simon's case took a sharp turn after Awand referred a personal injury case that ultimately settled for $18 million. Gage raked in $6 million from the settlement, Schiess said.

    Three days after Gage received the referral, he decided that Simon's anesthesiologist, not the surgeons, caused her paralysis.

    Schiess told jurors that Kabins waited 11 hours to perform emergency surgery when it was known that internal bleeding was causing Simon's paralysis. Thalgott, who was on a fishing expedition in Idaho, never called to check on Simon, even though he was aware of her declining condition, Schiess said.

    Gage and the surgeons' behavior made it clear they were in cahoots with each other, Schiess said. He pointed out that even though the surgeons believed they might be sued, they met with Gage without legal representation.

    It was during that meeting, Schiess said, that the three crafted a legal strategy to blame anesthesiologist Dan Burkhead.

    During depositions in preparation for trial, both Kabins and Thalgott took the stand, but Gage never asked a question about the delay between Simon's initial diagnosis and the emergency surgery.

    Thalgott testified that though the deposition took place a year after the catastrophic surgery, he never looked at Simon's records or researched what might have caused the paralysis before testifying.

    Thalgott said Awand hired attorney Robert Eglet to represent the doctors during the depositions. Thalgott testified that he knew Awand's friendship with Eglet and Gage was a positive sign.

    Contact reporter Adrienne Packer at apacker@reviewjournal.com or (702) 384-8710.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 17 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Vegas Native wrote on March 19, 2008 08:24 PM: It is ironic that the government's case has essentially boiled down to trying to prove that Gage settled Ms. Simon's case for too LITTLE! They started this case claiming that they were running up the settlement values on these cases and running the medical malpractice insurers out of business. Which is it Mr. Brower? No wonder the jury couldn't reach a unanimous verdict.


    Craig wrote on March 19, 2008 07:19 PM: They must have brought in a California jury.


    tejeda wrote on March 19, 2008 07:02 PM: This town's legal and medical issues are a complete joke. And they are so enmeshed one cannot tell who is who any longer.

    Did any doctors or lawyers in Nevada study ETHICS?


    Just Watchin wrote on March 19, 2008 06:54 PM: Hey following this story, you said it all. Wonder if they are on the Desai wagon? The feds could have a hay day at the Red Rock Country Club. From doctors, lawyers to developers that's the place to be. What do you think goes on at their neighborly pot lucks?
    $$$$$$


    $$money$$ wrote on March 19, 2008 12:03 PM: The attorney said if there is one holdout who prevents the jury from making a unanimous decision, it could be because that juror somehow relates or identifies with the defendant.

    Or, did the ONE juror get a hefty pay day?


    Money Trees wrote on March 19, 2008 11:18 AM: Be better if there could be a conspiracy case against Big Insurance! When is that going to come? See, insurers created the "money game" in America, and all they know are games and tables. Big Scam in most cases. What next, Fart Insurance?


    Following This Story wrote on March 19, 2008 11:13 AM: It's back to business as usual in Las Vegas. Awand's team of doctors, judges, and lawyers are cranking up the old machine. The absence of Venger and Thalgott will have no effect, the boys will find some new greedy surgeons wanting to pay off their med school loans and move into Red Rock Country Club. Insurers and deep-pocket defendants beware.


    Lori wrote on March 19, 2008 10:52 AM: That court room looked like a whos' who of the legal community. Many legal firms had people monitering the case. Such interest. Did the case hit close to home?


    Disgusted wrote on March 19, 2008 10:48 AM: The jury instructions were a little confusing. This in itself could have a bearing on the outcome.

    On a positive note, he will be retried and he will have to pay again to defend himself. Maybe, his attorney's billing practices match his. $$$$$$


    RJNeedsAnEditor wrote on March 19, 2008 10:31 AM: Oldlawdawg, factual accuracy has never been the RJ's strong suit. This isn't the Washington Post.

    Probably the best use for the RJ is just to leave it in a roll and use it to swat dogs who p00p on the court house lawn.


    Read All Comments