Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

News
Mar. 29, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

New city hall on the agenda

Council to hear details Wednesday

By ALAN CHOATE
REVIEW-JOURNAL

Click image for enlargement.

Las Vegas leaders next week will revisit the idea of building a new city hall -- in fact, they could even approve spending money to start designing the $150 million project.

City Council members have given early indications that they like the project, but said they're also cautious because the city's budget is stretched tight and is likely to remain so for at least the next two years.

An indication of their support for the project could come as early as Wednesday, when the council considers a $2.7 million architecture contract for initial design work.

"Nobody realizes what kind of strain we're in better than I do," said Mayor Pro Tem Gary Reese.

Most Popular Stories
  • MOUNT CHARLESTON: Four die in plane crash
  • Two couples died in crash
  • NORM: Steve Wynn goes for mega-yacht
  • FAMILY SERVICES: Three visits preceded boy's death
  • NORM: Kirshner works on big Vegas project
  • NORM: Playboy models in state spotlight
  • Body of diver who jumped off 90-foot Lake Mead cliff found
  • NORM: Barkley is miffed by debt publicity
  • NORM: Playboy 'coed': Dad's OK with it
  • NORM: Elvis fan club will have star its way



    • Still, he added, "it may be a good opportunity to build one ... I want to keep the door open, so that I can definitely look at it."

    In February, the council accepted a report identifying a 2.8-acre plot on First Street between Lewis and Clark avenues as the best site for a new city hall. The property is now home to the closed Queen of Hearts casino and a couple of apartment complexes.

    As proposed, the new city hall would be part of an ambitious set of deals involving five blocks of office and retail space around the Queen of Hearts site, a new casino in nearby Union Park and new development on the existing city hall site.

    But for now, the City Council has a couple of straightforward questions to answer, Councilman Larry Brown said.

    "Is it the right opportunity, and is it the right time?" he said. "We would be remiss if we did not look at this. I personally think it's the right thing to do."

    On Wednesday, council members will hear details about a proposed deal with Live-Work Las Vegas LLC, which owns the Queen of Hearts site and four adjacent blocks.

    Live-Work Las Vegas would build the new city hall and surrounding buildings and the city would essentially be an anchor tenant in that development.

    In exchange for the Queen of Hearts land, Live-Work would receive a parcel in the 61-acre Union Park, which the city owns. Plans call for the company to build a 1,000-room hotel-casino there.

    Brown said he was surprised to see that item on the agenda because the city is leaving positions vacant, trimming part-time employees and closing more recreation centers on Sundays to save money.

    "That's a question mark," he said.

    He and Reese said they hadn't been briefed yet on that contract and declined to comment. Other council members and Mayor Oscar Goodman did not respond to requests for comment Friday.

    City spokeswoman Diana Paul said the contract is on the agenda in case the council decides to proceed with the project.

    "If the council decides to move forward on Wednesday, the contract will allow the city to move forward with the design so that construction is not delayed for another month," she said.

    The report on the city hall site estimated that construction costs could escalate as much as $1 million a month.

    As for building the proposed 251,000-square-foot building, Reese and Brown stressed that the initial cost would be borne by Live-Work Las Vegas. The city would pay it back either by leasing the space or buying it once the new city hall is complete.

    "It's a new financing option that literally defers not only the initial cost of construction, but also defers the initial risk of construction," Brown said. "I don't think we're in a financial position to take that risk."

    Reese said the project is "part of a jigsaw" and "part of the key to downtown."

    "If someone's going to build it for you, you have to look at it," he said.

    "We wouldn't have to pay anything for a couple of years, and hopefully by then the economy will come back. But we can't wait until then to decide if we're going to build it."

    Contact reporter Alan Choate at achoate@reviewjournal.com or (702) 229-6435.



    Leave Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    endrun wrote on March 29, 2008 06:23 PM: "We wouldn't have to pay anything for a couple of years, and hopefully by then the economy will come back. But we can't wait until then to decide if we're going to build it."

    Perfect..how 'bout if we put off paying the good ol boy's salary for a couple of years..maybe he'll develop a liver condition and we wont have to pay him at all.


    Eddie Winemiller wrote on March 29, 2008 05:20 PM: If Oscar & Company want to expand City Hall & Drive traffic to Fremont Street, Why not take over the boondoggle that is Neonopolis (which the taxpayers already paid for) and put the City Offices there.
    There are plenty of open & empty offices, lots of storage space. Vendors could even open some restaurants which would keep the employees in the building at lunchtime. The Mayor Pro Tem could even move his barber Shop there.
    Sounds like a win-win to me.


    David Huntington wrote on March 29, 2008 03:15 PM: Other council members and Mayor Oscar Goodman did not respond to requests for comment Friday

    Another scam in the making. What a bunch of crooks we have running our government.


    Anthony wrote on March 29, 2008 12:45 PM: At least they have the sense to let someone else build it - if the Regional Justice Center taught us anything its that government should never try to build anything itself, rather let some private company build the building and then buy it from them. Even if they make 10% profit, its cheaper than if the govt screws it up.


    Rodman wrote on March 29, 2008 12:29 PM: Budget shortfall, state cutting funds, casino revenue/taxes down, employees getting laid off ( but thats probably ok, there seems to be an excess) services being cut and these CLOWNS want to build a new city hall. Oscar is bound and determined to create an edifice to himself. What do you say we forget the new city hall and just name the alley behind the 4 Queens after Oscar and call it quits???


    tim wrote on March 29, 2008 07:38 AM: how do these people get elected? they all agree the moneys not coming in,yet they want to build themselves another palace.it never ends.


    William Bonzy wrote on March 29, 2008 07:05 AM: Let's see now., "Nobody realizes what kind of strain we're in better than I do" said Gary Reese. Then adds, "it may be a good opportunity to build one, I want to keep the door open, so that I can definitely look at it" Is this Barber nuts? Go cut some hair Gary. Sheesh!!!


    Bobby V. Luker wrote on March 29, 2008 05:50 AM: Yep, good idea, let's spend that 3 million right now. No problem, we can just raise taxes, let people go without eating, to pay for it. Who cares if our economy is so bad many people can't make ends meet? Throw that money away. Again, election time is coming, vote all encumbents out of office. We can show the politicians there is such a thing as term limits, and tht term limit is our vote