Incredulous wrote on April 01, 2008 06:40 PM: I heard on TV that now that the three doctors the Governor tried to oust are staying, that they have told the Governor, as well as Legislative Committee members to "forget it", in terms of the malpractice complaints against local doctors going back up on the BME website.

So much for informing the consumer. Once again, if you need serious medical treatment, go to Utah or California.

Joe wrote on March 30, 2008 07:46 PM: Gibbons is a joke. Not a good one either.
More than 100 people a day are testing positive for Hepatitis but of course there is no way to prove that Doctor Death is the reason. Yeah, right.

Nothing will be done regarding this issue until tourism starts being affected. Sad, but true.

Dear interesting wrote on March 30, 2008 07:34 PM: It's time the balance of power on the medical board leaned towards the patients. Who better to understand the effects of a bad doctor than someone who has been hurt by one.

We all know that doctors have the portion of their brain that allows them to care removed while in medical school. It's part of the class on live medical experiments. (You're just too eager to please your professors to stop and ask, why are we doing this?)

interesting wrote on March 30, 2008 03:53 PM: Oh, and JB, you're right, I am a doctor. But I'm not "into hurting people." My patients are usually overweight smokers who are diabetic and hypertensive all on their own. They can blame their PCP's all they want but no one prevents them from exercising, changing your lifestyle and taking their meds but that's the last thing they want to do. I don't have to be "into hurting people", because you guys do that to yourselves on a daily basis without my help.

interesting wrote on March 30, 2008 03:38 PM: I am just confused. Everybody on this board believes that it is not objective and fair to have doctors on the medical board because they will support fellow doctors in their decisions. So, isn't having people affected by malpractice on the board just the complete other end of the spectrum? Won't they just support anybody who brings up a suit against a doctor whether it is justified or not? How is that any better? Why not have people without conflicts of interest?

Vegasbaby wrote on March 30, 2008 02:12 PM: nothing never changes. it's vegas baby!

real property real profit wrote on March 30, 2008 02:10 PM: Who owns that building on Shadow Lane? I've heard you can work out some pretty good deals in that area.

WhatsWithThatGibbonsPicture... wrote on March 30, 2008 11:53 AM:


In that picture above of Idiot Jim, it looks like he's about to verbally eviscerate someone, then lost his train of thought.

Or, he's in a staring match with his wife.

No, he's in a staring match with the Coldwell and Banker portraits.

Actually, that picture is the avitar the Devil uses for his blog entries.

JB wrote on March 30, 2008 11:41 AM: "interesting" is obviously a doctor who is into hurting people. AllsNotWell is onto something.

I'm not the JB who agreed with AllsNotWell.

LV resident wrote on March 30, 2008 11:17 AM: This will just be another case of Dr's protecting Dr.'s...and at the patient's expense. The three should have been removed; they were well aware of Desai's methods and practices and chose to keep quiet. All Dr's concerned, including these three, will eventually walk away from their shameful and criminal practices; only their patients will suffer. It is obvious, despite their claims of concern for patient safety and their holier than thou attitudes; their objective is maintaining their positions on their lofty pedestals...while continuing to fill their pockets. What an embarrassment to Las Vegas and the state of NV.

Read All Comments