Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

News


City to review its operations

LV officials say revenue unlikely to grow as it has in recent years

The Las Vegas City Council ordered a top-to-bottom review of city operations Monday following another bleak hearing on city finances. The overall message was: Even when conditions improve, the rosy days of recent history aren't likely to return.

"The 'Happy Days Are Here Again,' when we see them, will be different from the happy days we've seen for the last eight years," Mayor Oscar Goodman said. "We're going into different times.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • AIR MARSHALS: Uncivil Aviation
  • CITYCENTER CONSTRUCTION SITE: Safety issues raised
  • LAKE LAS VEGAS: Bankrupt project still alive
  • SOUTHERN NEVADA ECONOMY: Analysts' projections sour
  • Wynn, 'known prostitutes' in tussle, LV police captain says
  • JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Judge denies charges
  • JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Judge faces accuser
  • NORM: Restaurateur tells his side of 'setup'
  • Boyd Gaming suspends construction work on Echelon project
  • NORM: Vegas ties abound at Beijing Olympics



  • "We may very well be entering the era of moderate revenue that will force us to reconsider how we do business as a city."

    The nationwide economic slowdown has shown up in collections of the consolidated sales tax, known as the "c-tax," which makes up a little more than half of Las Vegas' operating income.

    The city trimmed expenses this year by $18.5 million to make up a budget shortfall, a deficit that is expected to be about $40 million next year and $46 million in 2010.

    Although overall city revenue is expected to grow over the next few years even as the c-tax founders, expenditures are projected to grow faster. A large part of that growth is employee salaries and benefits, which include contractually required increases and rising health care and retirement costs.

    The budget cuts -- estimated at $20.6 million in future years and largely achieved by holding positions vacant -- will remain in place to help meet the future shortfalls, and the city has reserves to draw on.

    Finance director Mark Vincent also recommended creating a $30 million "stabilization fund" to cover costs in the 2010 and 2011 fiscal years.

    The money would come from trimming or deferring capital projects, delaying the replacement of some electronic equipment and vehicles and diverting some money from other uses.

    "It solves our problem in '10 and '11 and pushes it out to '12 and '13," Vincent said. "That gives us a chance to plan for that."

    The move also gives the economy time to recover, he said, and if all of the stabilization fund is not needed, the money can be returned to the original expenditures.

    When the recovery comes, though, Las Vegas is not likely to see the kind of heady revenue growth of the past few years.

    The c-tax growth alone was often above 10 percent in 2003 through the beginning of 2007, and in some quarters in 2004 and 2005, it approached 20 percent growth.

    Much of that was fueled by real estate sales and related spending. Economic analyst John Restrepo told the council Monday that the city simply does not have any room left for the kind of growth seen over the past decade.

    Vincent said that future city revenue growth would be in the single digits, perhaps around 6 percent or 7 percent a year.

    That forecast was behind Goodman's call for a "fundamental review of city operations, programs and services" over the next six months.

    He said he wants a prioritized list of potential cuts and the amounts they would save, and he also directed city staff to review employee benefits to see whether savings and reductions could be negotiated in future contracts.

    "Our revenues are down, but nevertheless expectations for services are high," Goodman said. "Our revenues are no longer sufficient to sustain the level of services we have had in the past."

    City spokesman David Riggleman said the benefit review could include items such as the annual cost-of-living increase -- perhaps tying the increase to an outside measure like the Consumer Price Index instead of setting a fixed figure.

    About 90 percent of city workers are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and while terms vary, annual increases usually include a step increase of 5 percent and cost-of-living adjustments of 3 percent or 4 percent.

    Contact reporter Alan Choate at achoate@reviewjournal.com or (702) 229-6435.



    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    nvkorruption wrote on April 02, 2008 04:42 PM: nvkorruption wrote on April 02, 2008 01:39 PM:
    Hey...how much does it cost to pay for cleaning up the smut passed out to even kids on the strip by the illegals?

    Word is that the reason the cops dont mess with the illegals is that there is juice behind it.

    Nevertheless...how much does it cost taxpayers to pay for cleaning up the smut trash on the strip?


    CAS127 wrote on April 01, 2008 02:57 PM: "budget cuts"

    Stop playing the crooked pols' crooked game.

    If they insist on ever more absurd annual budget increases, I absolutely refuse to call any reduction in their demented fantasies a "cut".

    Save the word "cut" for when *spending* goes down - not when economic reality fails to adhere to politicians' authoritarian spending fantasies.

    Why do we let these ****bags frame the debate and establish the definitions (which bear no resemblance to the real-world definition of words)?

    Any curiosity about why people are fleeing the mass media and destroying "journalism's" lucrative little oligopoly?

    Could it be because you hacks have been retailing the pols' economic BS for decades?


    Bob wrote on April 01, 2008 09:40 AM: The cops have tons of money and now that everyone is paying that high cop sales tax, there should be enough for everyone. Everyone has to sacrifice including the police budget.
    Get a clue to where you money is going.


    ths wrote on April 01, 2008 07:01 AM: Collective bargaining can hurt a city in the long run. A 5% and 3% to 4% raise totals out to a 8% or 9% raise.

    I am a very accomplished person who works hard in what I do and the company I work for has a raise scale from 0% to 5%. If you get a 0% raise you are at risk of losing your job as you are under performing your basic duties. If you get a 5% raise as I was able to accomplish then you are highly exceeding your job expectations.

    Most raises range from 2 to 3% and the city should look at performance based raises. Only performance based raises will ensure we retain the best and lose the dead weight.