Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

News


$150 MILLION BUILDING: City Hall plans win support

Council unanimously backs downtown building projects

Las Vegas officials lined up behind plans for a new City Hall, saying Wednesday that the building and other planned developments related to it would remake downtown with little upfront cost to taxpayers.

City Council members acknowledged the current economic picture, however, and the fine line they must walk in pursuing a big-ticket building project while the city is cutting services and holding positions vacant to make ends meet.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • AIR MARSHALS: Uncivil Aviation
  • CITYCENTER CONSTRUCTION SITE: Safety issues raised
  • LAKE LAS VEGAS: Bankrupt project still alive
  • SOUTHERN NEVADA ECONOMY: Analysts' projections sour
  • Wynn, 'known prostitutes' in tussle, LV police captain says
  • JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Judge denies charges
  • JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Judge faces accuser
  • NORM: Restaurateur tells his side of 'setup'
  • Boyd Gaming suspends construction work on Echelon project
  • NORM: Vegas ties abound at Beijing Olympics



  • A combative Mayor Oscar Goodman said that when the bill comes due for the $150 million building, it will be money well spent.

    "It couldn't be spent better," he said. "This isn't going to be an ordinary City Hall. This is going to be a civic center.

    "I can't see any reason why we shouldn't go through with this. This is a no-brainer. I don't believe anybody's at risk on this one."

    The council backed him unanimously in approving a preliminary agreement with Live-Work Las Vegas LLC, which sets the stage for the ambitious set of projects to go forward. A final deal will be before the council next month.

    Even Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, who earlier was the lone vote against pursuing a new City Hall, supported the idea Wednesday.

    "I am now viewing this issue somewhat differently," she said.

    Tarkanian said her research had changed her mind, as well as an economic presentation on Monday that encouraged the city to use its assets -- namely, downtown real estate -- to spur economic development and job creation.

    The new City Hall would be a 251,000-square-foot building on the block of First Street between Lewis and Clark avenues. The 2.8-acre parcel would have room for future expansion.

    "I don't feel we need a new City Hall right now, but we will need one eventually," Tarkanian said.

    The proposal has many intertwined parts.

    Live-Work Las Vegas would build the new building, with the city projected to move in, and start paying rent, in 2011. Business development director Scott Adams estimated the annual rent at $10 million. But for the first five years, $8 million a year of that would be deferred, leaving $40 million plus interest due at the end of that period.

    Some or all of that could be covered by the sale of the existing six-acre City Hall site, along with 12 neighboring acres the city owns next to the highway, or the city could bond for the amount or roll it into the existing lease, Adams said.

    Las Vegas would essentially be an anchor tenant for a five-block office/retail development along First Street, where Live-Work would build an additional 1.3 million square feet of space over several years.

    "City Hall is a must-do project for this thing to work," Adams said. "They will transform those five blocks."

    In exchange for the ground under the new City Hall, Live-Work would receive a parcel in the city-owned Union Park development on which it would build a 1,000-room casino-hotel. When that's online -- about the time the deferred lease period is over -- tax revenue from the new resort would cover about half the annual City Hall lease payment, Adams said. The city would also have the option of buying the new City Hall.

    The Live-Work development includes a new transit station for public transportation, relocating the existing station on Stewart Avenue. That, in turn, opens up property next to the Lady Luck casino, which is being redeveloped by a separate company.

    Adams said the projects would inject an estimated $4.1 billion in investment downtown, eventually generating $16 million to $20 million in additional tax revenues a year and creating 13,400 jobs.

    That's "impressive," said Councilman Steve Wolfson. But, he noted, "anything can happen," and wondered what risks existed for the city if the dominoes didn't fall as expected.

    Adams said the main risk is that the casino-hotel won't get built, which would reduce the number of jobs created and the amount of new revenue for the city. But he insisted the city would still see benefits even without the new resort. And, he noted, the city would still have a parcel of land approved for unrestricted gaming.

    Hanging over Wednesday's discussion was the city's current financial picture. The economic downturn has hit city revenue hard, with officials cutting $18.5 million from this year's budget while staring down the barrel of an expected $40 million deficit next year.

    Knight Allen, a professional investor and longtime government spending watchdog, said city leaders were showing symptoms of what he called an "insider mentality."

    "It's a disease. They get into government, and they're into the upper echelons of Enron," Allen said.

    "They're already talking about slower growth for Las Vegas," he said, and yet the council is willing to take on a large, long-term obligation.

    While Allen gave the city credit for its successes in Union Park, he predicted "they're going to get their building, and we're going to get reduced services."

    City leaders gave two reasons for pushing ahead with a building project now: The city doesn't have to put up any money until the building's done, and the economy is expected to improve by then. And waiting to start likely means higher construction costs.

    "Yes, we are in an economic crisis," Councilman Ricki Barlow said, but, he added, "we're in a position to place ourselves in a beautiful spot.

    "We're going to take our hits. I'm willing to take those hits."

    Councilman Larry Brown said "the safe way" would be to put off making a decision.

    "Unfortunately, the more we defer decisions ... all we're doing is passing that burden on," he said. "That's the safe way. This council has not taken the safe way."

    Contact reporter Alan Choate at achoate@reviewjournal.com or (702) 229-6435.



    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Rodman wrote on April 03, 2008 02:54 PM: The spend it like you got it city commission needs to remember that at some date they will have to pay and what happends if they don't have the money?? The city pays a large portion of metros budget. Shortly metro will come calling for a sales tax increase to generate more funds. Now, if the city has money to pay for a new city hall that isn't really needed, why should I vote to increase my expenses for more sales tax for metro? Metro, the city just obligated your budget increase for a new city hall and since they have that kind of money to throw around instead of providing you with more funds, good luck; you have Oscar and his merry band to thank because you won't get my vote for an increased sales tax measure when the city is flush will money for something not needed.


    dwc wrote on April 03, 2008 02:10 PM: Well, since I'm a hendertucky resident, this doesn't affect me. But if I were a LV resident, I'd be a little ticked when the mayor said it's a no-brainer. Maybe somebody needs to brain their mayor?

    Also, no incumbents is a good mantra for several election cycles. Who cares, really, who the new guy is. After several election cycles, the cockroach network will be fairly disrupted to the point that we can start examining incumbency again. That's anice message for the politico class: "Your job is one term, and one term ONLY!"


    Mamamia wrote on April 03, 2008 11:49 AM: When are you people who pay the bills stop that nut-case Oscar"gimme-a-drink-Goodnik dictate what he wants and not what is good for the city? This guy is out of his mind with delusions of his allure and power of persuasion. O' Ye of short memories-don't forget all the other "great ideas" this bum had that fizzled into a drizzle downtown! Tell him to jump in Lake Mead, and maybe all the hot air in this guy will help raise up the water level! Ya'think?


    Mamamia wrote on April 03, 2008 11:43 AM: Open Letter to Las Vegans: Are you people as crazy as that gin-guzzling "mayor"? The entire state is in financial trouble and that goofy nutcase "gimme-a-drink-Good (for nothing!)man wants to rent space in a high falutin' place? If you people allow this, you deserve the government you got by electing this dumb-bum! Stop letting him "burn" the city!


    Helen Weils wrote on April 03, 2008 09:24 AM: Oscar and his tax and spend regime should leave. This guy has turned into
    a total idiot!


    2zero wrote on April 03, 2008 08:47 AM: I believe Oscar said it best; "this is a no brainer"! That means our city counsel is qualified on this one. Maybe Oscar's son open a brothel in the "redevelopment", that will take care of that pesky CCSD undereducated, non graduating class of 2011 (at least the girls).


    Phil wrote on April 03, 2008 08:21 AM: Fairly easy why they shouldn't.

    A walk down memory lane; Check with a former mayor, jan jones.

    Mainstreet Station

    Regional Justice Center over runs, city has courts there.

    Minami Tower:
    http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=32127

    And my personal favorite

    Florida Swamp Land purchase by the city of Las Vegas. Look that one up.


    R wrote on April 03, 2008 08:19 AM: Las Vegas city officials are guilty of Treason per NRS 196 for not upholding good morals and public decency per NRS 201. They belong in jail for how they are running this city, and I have told them this, and plan to protest the next gay parade too. Please pray JESUS takes this land back for HIM, and that we get morals and truth back into our nation before the wrath of GOD hits this place hard. Thanks so much!

    servingjesus99212@yahoo.com


    Mike Mahoney wrote on April 03, 2008 08:09 AM: Who is Knight Allen? He is a member of the Knights of Columbus, does he even have a colleg degree? Compaired to the County Taj Mahal, and HENDERTUCKY ... I mean Henderson (pop 200k-ish) whats the deal ... have any of you carpetbaggers in Sun City been to City Hall ... EVER ... LOL!! Old people ... I don't want to pay your social security ... or your medicade ... just pass away already please.


    This stinks wrote on April 03, 2008 08:05 AM: Who are the contractors involved. Who are the investors that are involved that will tell the story.

    Also, voting all incumbents out needs to be done. However, there needs to be a plan as to who should replace them. Each time we vote someone out we find out we just put one of their cronies in to replace them and it gets worse.


    Read All Comments