Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


COLORADO RIVER FLOW: Snowpack delivers on promise

Water authority spokesman says drought has 'taken the year off'

Since January, weather forecasters and water managers have been predicting a promising year on the Colorado River.

Now the bright outlook has some numbers attached to it.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested




  • According to the latest projections from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the above-average snowpack along the western slope of the Rocky Mountains could mean an extra 653,000 acre-feet of water for Lake Mead.

    As the snowpack melts in the coming months, the flow of the Colorado is projected to swell to 122 percent of normal, hastening the recovery of Lake Powell.

    Bureau officials say they now expect Powell's water level to rise more than 40 feet by year's end, allowing the reservoir on the Utah-Arizona border to send more water than usual downstream to Mead.

    The increase will mark the first time in seven years that Lake Powell has released more than the standard 8.23 million acre-feet of water through Glen Canyon Dam and into the Grand Canyon.

    It also marks the first use of new federal guidelines adopted in December to better coordinate the operation of lakes Mead and Powell.

    Though the additional water is more than double Nevada's annual share of the Colorado River, it won't be enough to keep Lake Mead water levels from dropping over the next eight months. That's because 8.9 million acre-feet of water will flow into the lake this year and 9.5 million acre-feet will flow out to supply Nevada, California, Arizona and Mexico.

    The Las Vegas Valley pulls 90 percent of its water from the reservoir, but Nevada's annual share of the Colorado is the smallest by far among the seven Western states that draw from the river.

    Instead of dropping 11 feet by the end of the year, Lake Mead now is projected to fall about 5 feet, thereby reaching its lowest level since May 1965.

    "We're certainly glad to see it's going to be better than projected," said Scott Huntley, spokesman for the Southern Nevada Water Authority. "Obviously, that doesn't mean the drought is over. It's taken the year off."

    The water level at Lake Mead has plunged nearly 95 feet since 2000.

    Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0350.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Valjean wrote on April 29, 2008 03:30 PM: this is so disappointing. I heard a while back on a local radio station that lake mead would rise about 10 feet because of the heavy snow pack. Probably the DJ got that information from the original RJ article on march 21st which stated that. I see that only about 2 weeks later, the same journalist writes in this article that Lake Mead, instead is going to still get lower, just not as much as would've happened without this snowpack. You can also find that information on the Department of Reclamation website, which is where I found the correct information first. Why can't they raise Lake Powell to 50% capacity and give us a little more water in lake mead instead?


    Report abuse

    yeah ok wrote on April 15, 2008 06:43 PM: to JR: Why let the water run through the dam. That is NOT sustainable power. Since we are in a Global warming situation its time you look at conserving water. Why have coal plants solar is free. I see you just don't get it.


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on April 15, 2008 09:46 AM: JR you must be a CA to think you conserve. I have friends and family and little to nothing of the average user is being done.

    I drive the highways and the landscaping along the sides are still being watered with high flow sprinkler heads instead of drip lines.

    So once again specifically tell me what they are doing outside of paying farmers to not grow? Also who decided to put farms in the desert?


    Report abuse

    Ray Walker wrote on April 15, 2008 09:34 AM: When full, Lake Mead has a surface of 158,000 acres. At an evaporation rate of 5 vertical feet per year, evaporation losses are about 750,000 acre feet, which is less than the 1,000,000 acre feet that the new fresh water Source can provide.

    It is rather ironic that the projected LOSS of five (5) vertical feet of water in Lake Mead this year could be ZERO (0) if the new Source was available.

    In about the same amount of time that Lake Mead is predicted to go dry by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego , the excess 1,000,000 acre feet from the non-tributary Source could be accumulated to actually keep Lake Mead FULL ! (That is only one of many options.)

    When FULL, the seventeen turbine-generators at the Lake Mead powerhouse generate a maximum of 2,074 megawatts of hydroelectric power. An average megawatt is the energy produced by the continuous operation of one megawatt of capacity over a period of one year (8,760,000 kilowatt-hours). A megawatt is worth $.05 per KW Hr X 8,760,000 = $438,000/year. Lake Mead averages 1840 megawatts = $ 0.81 Billion/year. Present worth of .8 Billion/year @ 3% interest = $ 26 Billion.

    Strange....that the Bureau of Reclamation, Nevada and the Southern Nevada Water Authority cannot investigate a new fresh water Source that when developed will preserve Lake Mead and not damage the water rights of anyone, anywhere or the environment.

    Maybe the Bureau, Nevada and the Southern Nevada Water Authority are waiting until Lake Mead and its 2000 megawatts of power are gone before they consider investigation a worthwhile endeavor for the people they serve...?

    Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) waterrdw@yahoo.com


    Report abuse

    JR wrote on April 15, 2008 08:40 AM: To ths: California, specifically LA and San Diego have immense conservation programs, similar to those in Southern Nevada and they are paying farmers to not grow crops which saves water but increases the cost of our groceries because there is less supply. Southern Nevadas main concern with the lake is that the water authorities intakes will suck air if the water continues to drop.

    To yeah ok: Of course NV should use solar, I read that if an area the size of area 51 was covered in solar panels it could supply all the power for the entire U.S. (not taking into account the natural loss through transmission). But, the energy creation by hydroelectricity is also a very sustainable resource because it doesn't boil the water or anything to make it diminish, it uses the natural flow downstream to turn turbines that create energy. So, we actually want more water to go through the dams not less because the coal plants use water as cooling ponds, that's where energy conservation can lead to water conservation.


    Report abuse

    yeah ok wrote on April 15, 2008 07:58 AM: As soon as people wake up. Go take a look at Lake Mojave. It is full. look at mead. Down 95 feet. Look at Powell Down whatever. Its not about water consumption. Its about energy consumption. Davis Dam and Hoover dam produce the most electricity on the west coast. Start conserving electricity, seek other sources, like Solar. (DUH) then mabye the lake will fill again. At the least every goverment building should have solar electricity. How about Vegas trade solar electicity for water. A trade like that and the lake would never be in a drought again.


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on April 15, 2008 07:10 AM: Lets do the math, 9.5 million acre feet used from Lake Mead, but Nevada uses less then 350,000 acre feet. We keep conserving which only allows our allowance to go further, but it will never prevent the lake from keep on dropping.

    Can someone answer to me what California is doing to conserve? If they are doing nothing then the Federal Government should step in and force them as it seems like they are the greatest threat on the lake and not Southern Nevada.