Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
News


Spending strategy criticized

Ensign bucks putting extras in bill for Iraq

WASHINGTON -- As Congress and President Bush position themselves to fight over a bill spending billions of dollars more for the war in Iraq, Sen. John Ensign said Thursday that he won't support adding $5.25 million to aid Las Vegas health officials responding to the hepatitis C outbreak.

Ensign said he wants to get the Southern Nevada Health District the money, but not as part of a war bill that he said could get complicated if earmarks are added.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • Police serve search warrant at Hell's Angels clubhouse
  • Police serve search warrant at Hell's Angels clubhouse
  • Study urges Nevada and nine other states to take care in handling economy
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Cada wins World Series of Poker championship
  • Cada wins World Series of Poker championship
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • With that, the Nevada Republican is siding with the president in a looming spending battle. Bush has demanded lawmakers approve $108 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan but nothing more for other priorities.

    While planning to provide financial support for U.S. troops, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and fellow Democrats also are considering billions of dollars for road construction and repairs and other economic stimuli.

    Reid backs federal aid to the health district. He said Thursday that "it is not going to make it any easier" to obtain the funding if Ensign is not on board.

    Ensign said in a separate interview, "We are trying to keep the supplemental bill clean. We are looking to do this in a responsible way."

    He added: "You start adding things, you know what happens. It becomes a Christmas tree."

    Ensign said he has asked the Department of Health and Human Services to find money in its budget that could be directed to Las Vegas so that Congress would not have to spend "and add to the deficit."

    "These are huge agencies," Ensign said. "There is money out there that is unspent."

    He has received no response yet from the department.

    Ensign's position is consistent with his reputation as a fiscal conservative. But on the matter of the massive health alert that has hit close to home, his stance was criticized Thursday.

    Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said the local funding "should not be held hostage by political gamesmanship."

    "It is more than appropriate to make this request part of a funding package designed to address emergencies and other pressing needs including funding for our troops," Berkley said in a statement. "While others may want to sit on their hands, I am not willing to wait another nine months or longer for these funds."

    It's not clear when, or if, lawmakers will consider other appropriations bills before the fall elections.

    Rep. Jon Porter, R-Nev., supports adding Las Vegas health funding to the war spending bill, spokesman Matt Leffingwell said.

    But Porter's vote will depend on how the bill addresses Iraq, Leffingwell said. If Democrats add troop withdrawal provisions, for instance, Porter would vote against it.

    Aides to Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., did not respond to a message seeking his views.

    Signs of Ensign's reluctance to back the Las Vegas spending surfaced earlier this week when he did not join Reid in recommending it to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

    In response to a Reid invitation, officials from the Southern Nevada Health District asked for $3 million to pay for the blood tests of 15,000 uninsured and under-insured people who were patients at the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada.

    Another $1.4 million was requested for follow-up testing and vaccinations for persons who test positive for HIV or hepatitis.

    Nearly seven weeks ago, 40,000 letters were sent to former patients of the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada by health care authorities because of unsafe injection practices at the clinic. The patients were urged to be tested for blood-borne diseases, including hepatitis C, an incurable, potentially fatal condition that attacks the liver.

    Other funds would support the health district's hepatitis help line and pay to organize patient records seized by authorities during searches of the endoscopy center and its sister facilities in the valley.

    Reid also requested $21 million on behalf of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the federal agency that has assisted Southern Nevada authorities.

    Some of those funds would steer into the agency's work in Las Vegas, including genetic mapping to determine whether infections could be traced to problem clinics. Other funds would initiate awareness campaigns to avert future disease outbreaks caused by imprudent health procedures.

    The agency also seeks $3.5 million to "incentivize" the private sector into fast-tracking research and development of safer medication packaging such as single-use-only syringes, according to officials who have seen the request.

    For some of the proposed CDC programs, the new money would amount to a down payment. Congress would be asked to spend more to keep the projects going into future years.

    Ensign said he had reservations about the agency's request. The CDC might have sensed an opening and built a wish list.

    "I just don't want the CDC to pile on," he said. "I am looking into this more carefully."

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    dwc wrote on April 18, 2008 10:42 AM: Desai and Manthei were board members of the same bank. Manthei still is. Nice find on the "Keep Our Doctors in Nevada" link. Something really stinks and it's not just an endoscope.


    Report abuse

    Allen Gettelfinger wrote on April 18, 2008 09:24 AM: Why is there no demand for the funding of testing and follow up care being made on the assete of those responsible for this situation?


    Report abuse

    Kevin wrote on April 18, 2008 08:14 AM: Isn't it ironic tat Dr. Rudy Manthei is looking to buy two of these failed clinics?

    It was reported that these clinics had very small amounts of malpractice insurance relative to the large number of patients.

    Wasn't Dr. Rudy Manthei the prime guy behind lowering medical malpractice awards in Nevada just a few years ago?

    Oh, yes he was: from the RGJ:
    "The bitter fight in 2004, marked by twisted statistics and emotional hyperbole, pit doctors against trial lawyers -- and the doctors won.

    But four months ago, a three-year shield that prevented the Legislature from touching the voter-imposed law expired.

    But those who organized the Keep Our Doctors in Nevada initiative that created the caps, cautioned against a knee-jerk reaction to what they agree is an unacceptable breakdown in patient protection.

    "If you think having a higher cap would have changed the behavior of any of these physicians, I'd think you're wrong," said Dr. Rudy Manthei, a Las Vegas physician who was chairman of Keep Our Doctors in Nevada. "You're always going to find somebody who thinks they can get away with it. It's not a matter of money.""

    What a crazy world! Who could fault you if you thought the whole thing was a macro business plan?


    Report abuse

    BR wrote on April 18, 2008 07:50 AM: Hang in there Senator Ensign. Our current health care scare was caused by a few greedy and unethical doctors. The leading culprit is Dr Desai. He and the others have a lot of fiscal resources. Make them personally bear the costs of testing and any necessary care of those who test positive. They can also pay for organizing those records since originated them. All other elements mentioned in this article are just boondoggles thrown into the war appropriations bill by Dingy Harry to put pressure on GWB. It's part of the old earmarks game.

    I understand and appreciate your stand on this matter, Senator Ensign.


    Report abuse

    Dave L wrote on April 18, 2008 07:27 AM: To: STEVE TETREAULT, Reporter
    RE: "Ensign's position is consistent with his reputation as a fiscal conservative."

    Please disclose your GOP operative registration. As many people are aware, when Congress was controlled by the Republican Party, every supplemental bill to pay for the wars was larded up with pork and Ensign voted for them (I believe he had numerous pork projects of his own).

    In FY 2008, Ensign has sponsored or co-sponsored some $235,000,000 in earmarks. (congresswatch)

    He's had some good legilsation, but don't call him a fiscal conservative; he's no more that than a blonde woman!


    Report abuse

    Bobby wrote on April 18, 2008 06:49 AM: Thank God we have Ensign, just too bad he can't control Reid and Berkley. Reid can still do a lot of damage from now till 2010, whne he's up for election.