Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


DOWNTOWN CRACKDOWN

Las Vegas police effort out of step, critics say

Jaywalk or commit some other minor infraction in downtown Las Vegas and you might get a warning, or a ticket.

If you have a criminal record, though, you might go to jail.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • Though the policy has come under scrutiny and criticism because of a 2005 court case, the aggressive stance remains on the books of what's known as the "Downtown Initiative," a 4-year-old police effort to deal with chronic crime.

    "It's discretionary," said Capt. Will Minor, who heads the Police Department's Downtown Area Command, when asked if the policy is still active. "I won't sit here and tell you no."

    But he argued that something crucial has been lost in the debate over the 2005 case in which a man on parole was stopped for jaywalking, subsequently searched by police and found to have drugs. That is, an officer's discretion.

    "Anything that you get a ticket for, you can be arrested for," Minor said. "A ticket is a privilege ... it's allowing you to go free on a promissory note that you will show up in court."

    The initiative is aimed at people who "display a chronic, consistent nuisance and do not take care of business," Minor said. If that's the case, "why am I going to continue to give you that privilege?"

    State law and the Nevada Supreme Court take a more limited view of that discretion, and critics argue that the policy basically targets the poor, the homeless and the drug-addicted.

    "This is such a misguided, misdirected and ridiculous way to deal with these problems," said Gary Peck, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada. "And it's so anathema to our core values."

    S-T-R-A-T-E-G-I-C

    The Downtown Initiative is actually a bit of a misnomer, Minor said. He described it as a planning tool the department uses to take "a long-term approach to crime," and it simply became known as an initiative.

    "Typical law enforcement is a reactive business," he said. "You're victimized, you call. We come, we try to get the bad guy and put him in jail.

    "How do we stop as many of the crimes before they're committed as possible?"

    As he described it, the answer to that question involves getting officers to talk to each other, relay real-time information about what's happening on the street and coordinate better with special investigative units.

    "Our numbers are always a week behind," Minor explained. "Our math may show that crime is at 15th and Fremont. However, that was last week. ... We started focusing on 15th and Fremont, and now it's moved up to Eighth and Fremont.

    "Officers are out there every shift, every day, so what we say is, 'If you see it, make the call.' "

    The plan also came up with the acronym STRATEGIC, which contains the initiative's broad goals.

    There's "I" for "Improving quality of life" and "E" for "Excellence and accountability."

    Other letters concern actions -- "T" is "Targeting core areas," and "R" stands for "Reduce crime in traditionally high-crime areas."

    But it's the "A" in that acronym -- "Arrest habitual criminal offenders" -- that's gotten the most attention.

    A QUESTIONABLE SEARCH?

    On Feb. 23, 2005, Michael Dulin-Evans crossed a downtown street against the light, and a Las Vegas police officer called him over. Dulin-Evans complied and handed over his identification as requested.

    The officer later testified that he arrested Dulin-Evans rather than cite him because the man had a criminal record, and that's what the officer was supposed to do under the Downtown Initiative.

    The arrest included a search, and Dulin-Evans had marijuana and methamphetamine. He was subsequently charged with possession with intent to sell.

    Though Dulin-Evans' attorney filed a challenge to that search, it was never heard because the defendant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance.

    He won permission from the Nevada Supreme Court to withdraw the guilty plea. The court noted "the highly questionable nature of the arrest pursuant to the Downtown Initiative and the subsequent search and seizure."

    The court ordered new trial proceedings for him.

    PRETEXTS

    The problem with this approach is that it targets people based on their status in the criminal justice system instead of what they've actually done, said Allen Lichtenstein, general counsel for the ACLU of Nevada.

    "They're not dealing with all jaywalkers this way," he said. "They're dealing with certain people -- and that's why it becomes pretextual."

    That's lawyer-speak for "making up a reason."

    "It's not a crime to be poor. It's not a crime to be homeless," Lichtenstein said.

    "It's not a crime to have a criminal record," Peck added.

    Dulin-Evans' case is complicated by the fact he was carrying illegal drugs and was on parole, which means he could be searched if there was reason to suspect that he was violating the terms of his parole agreement.

    Whether that applied is far from clear, according to the Nevada Supreme Court.

    And while officers do have some discretion to arrest people for misdemeanors instead of ticketing them, state law and court precedent put limits on that discretion.

    If a person won't provide identification, indicates he won't appear in court, or there's evidence of other criminal activity, an arrest can be warranted.

    Short of that, though, an officer can abuse his discretion and invalidate an arrest and search if the person is taken into custody instead of cited.

    That's what the state Supreme Court said of Dulin-Evans' case: "The police officer's stated reasons for arresting and searching [Dulin-Evans] ... violated Nevada statutory law and was in excess of the police officer's authority."

    The ACLU was not part of that case, which did not challenge the Downtown Initiative directly.

    "We're exploring our options," Lichtenstein said. "Clearly we'd like to do it without litigation. That's always a last resort.

    "If they don't like the criticism that they're getting, then the remedy is to stop doing it."

    At the same time, police are proud of the crime reductions they've achieved downtown and want to keep that momentum going.

    While progress fluctuates, Minor can point to statistics from the first four months of 2007 and this year showing that homicides, sexual assaults, burglaries and auto thefts are down in the downtown area.

    For now, anyway.

    "The time is no more when you can simply be reactive to crime," Minor said. "Whether you want to admit it or not, we're in the middle of a recession. What happens in a recession? Crime goes up.

    "We can't wait for that. We have to be out in front."

    Contact reporter Alan Choate at achoate@reviewjournal.com or 702-229-6435.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 58 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    vp wrote on April 27, 2008 10:45 AM: Free Nevada,

    Now you've determined the police are planting drugs on these known druggies? Aren't you a paranoid freak! You sound like someone that's been arrested for possession of drugs you claim aren't yours.


    Raul wrote on April 27, 2008 01:23 AM: ACLU is famous for defending the crime in this city. They like to be on the newspaper and be notices. They critic every initiative from LVMPD, however they neither do nor give any solution to any problem. Crime record is not a problem, please ACLU be real.


    Jason wrote on April 26, 2008 11:07 PM: "A 4-year-old police effort to deal with chronic crime". Jaywalking and other minor infractions are "chronic crimes", wow, we have it great in Vegas, guess the police rounded up all the murderers, rapists, prostitutes, gangs, corrupte politicians and cops, and other such deviants and criminals. Guess that's why everyone's moving to Vegas, no harden criminals around here, cops tok care of all of that, I wonder what I get for spitting on the sidewalk for flipping some on off, 10-20 years, get real, this country is becomein more and more like a communist police state, where jack booted thugs (cops) get away with murder and the commisars dictate from thier political offices.


    Commonsense wrote on April 26, 2008 10:50 PM: Oh Brother, arrest jaywalkers but let the Dirty Doctors still run around and practice their vile and dangerous professions! Arrest those scumbags. Forget the bums and drunks! Jesus H Christ! get your priorities straight you law enforcement officals!


    Free Nevada wrote on April 26, 2008 08:39 PM: "A ticket is a privilege", huh ..including the ticket you get for giving a hungry guy standing outside of McDonalds minding his own business a $1.08 so he can go in and wolf down a double cheeseburger?

    I want drug using parolees to go to jail, but as far as an area where they bust guys who are down and out just for jaywalking, then maybe plant drugs in his pocket and send him to prison for life (or a knife in his hand and blow him away) just so the former mob lawyer who runs the place can "cleanup the town", I can't think of a reason in the world I'd want to come within 10 miles of the place and voting with my wallet is the only vote those guys seem to understand. They can have a nice clean downtown with boarded up businesses on every block.


    Brendan Perez wrote on April 26, 2008 08:21 PM: It's high time that the law was changed to forbid arrest for certain types of crimes. There's no reason the police should have the power to arrest someone for things like jaywalking, loitering, traffic offenses of all sorts, disturbing the peace, disorderly conduct, etc.

    The last two especially should be ticket only crimes as it's common for police to use these two vague crimes to arrest people for doing something they don't like. Police routinely use disorderly conduct as a reason to arrest people filming them, protestors, people who dare to have an "attitude" while stopped,etc.

    Only felonies and violent misdemeanors should be arrestable offenses.

    If the police are going to abuse their power, then that power needs to be removed. They can fight crime without arresting people for trivial offenses like jaywalking, loitering, etc.

    More importantly, how many officers are off the street and for how long, when they decide to arrest someone for jaywalking?


    Michael Ray Thompson wrote on April 26, 2008 06:07 PM: I'm all for strong laws and enforcement of those laws. Metro Police of Las Vegas cannot be trusted with strong laws. They're of the type of people who will enharently abuse authority.


    vp wrote on April 26, 2008 05:44 PM: Chilling Craig,

    I don't find it chilling at all. I'm quite okay with the scenario you described, I don't find it chilling in the least. If you're walking around downtown with a baggy in your pocket you should be arrested and charged with possession. Let's not forget that drugs are illegal. Let's be honest here, some people keep complaining about tourists being arrested for jaywalking, which isn't at all the situation. People are being questioned for jaywalking, only the criminals with drugs on them are going to jail. How can this bother decent people. Get the druggies off the streets! You wouldn't want them walking around your neighborhood!


    Summerlin Res wrote on April 26, 2008 05:03 PM: Great job Metro! Keep up the great work! I have no problems with what they are accomplishing! I don't go around breaking the law. I don't do drugs, speed or jaywalk. It is people that complain are the ones that break the law.
    The ACLU can go to Africa. There are alot of people there that need the help. If we allow the Police dept. to clean up the garbage here then tourism would go up and all of us would enjoy living here more!


    Richard wrote on April 26, 2008 04:39 PM: Arresting people for jay walking will only compoound the problemed economy downtown. Locals are a major contributor to the consumtion of goods and services provided downtown. Police presence and not police abuse causes crime to go down. Arrest a tourist for jay walking and you will never see that tourist in vegas again. Like it or not a large amount of people who contribute to a comunity who makes its living off people who drink and gamble are not the cream of the crop.


    Read All Comments