Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

News


Yucca delay may spur interim storage

Nuclear waste piling up at plants

WASHINGTON -- State legislators are adding their voices to those who have grown impatient at slow progress in establishing nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain.

The National Conference of State Legislatures is expected today to recommend the government identify one or two sites where used nuclear fuel can be stored temporarily until the proposed repository 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas is built and until fuel recycling can be made available.

The policy change at the group's spring meeting will allow lobbyists to urge Congress to redirect a portion of the money in a $20 billion Yucca construction fund into a near-term alternative. Under the group's scenario, radioactive waste would be stored in hardened casks lined up on concrete pads for not longer than 25 years.

The conference becomes the second national organization this year to recommend steering high-level waste into temporary storage while the Department of Energy attempts to overcome a decade of delay to advance the Yucca project.


Most Popular Stories
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas
  • NORM: Cruise the object of a twin crush
  • Durango teacher accused of sex acts with student



  • The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners adopted a similar policy in February. The Nuclear Energy Institute is recruiting communities interested in hosting such a storage complex.

    Assemblywoman Kathy McClain, D-Las Vegas, said the shift toward interim storage might benefit Nevada leaders who have fought the Yucca repository.

    "We ought to be able to make it work for us," McClain said at the group's meeting. "I think it increases the chances that they might find an alternative in that 25 years."

    A subcommittee adopted the policy Friday.

    Since the vote was unanimous, it will be added to a fast-track agenda for approval at the final conference session, said John Heaton, a state representative from New Mexico.

    The new policy was propelled by legislators from New Mexico, Maryland and Maine who argued nuclear waste piling up at power plants in 35 states needs to be removed and taken somewhere if not Yucca Mountain right away.

    The issue is most pressing at 10 sites where reactors have been shut down but nuclear waste remains and requires costly protections, said Deborah Simpson, a Maine representative.

    "We can no longer sit back," said Sally Jameson, a member of the Maryland House of Delegates. "We have to try to make a path forward possible."

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    dave wrote on April 30, 2008 10:59 AM: There is a interim storage facility already part of the Yucca Mountain project. A sensible person would advocate that this facility be built and utilized ASAP.

    What do the legislators from New Mexico see in nuclear waste that Nevada doesn't? Could it be economic benefits??

    Wake-up Nevada!


    michaele freitag wrote on April 26, 2008 02:54 PM: i am no longer a las vegas resident, but i lived there from 1980 thru 2006 and all that time the government was trying to shove the screw nevada bill down our throats.... nevada doesn't have nuclear power, so why should they have to take waste from states that should have thought about the waste problem before they opened their plants.. why should nevadans have to take other states nuclear waste, we have children,communities,churches and families just like every other state..its not just a gambling mecca and
    i still get incensed when i hear it refered to as "sin city" it was the town i raised my children in and 2 of my grandchildren still live there, how many of you would like your family exposed to nuclear waste..