Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Porter challenger Daskas drops out of U.S. House race

Family concerns cited; Titus considering run







Democratic congressional candidate Robert Daskas abruptly withdrew from the race for Nevada's 3rd District on Monday, citing "family considerations."

Daskas, a former prosecutor, had been the Democrats' handpicked candidate to challenge Republican Rep. Jon Porter in what is seen as one of this year's hottest House races in the country.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say




  • Immediately after Daskas' surprise announcement, Democrats began touting state Senate Minority Leader Dina Titus, D-Las Vegas, as a replacement candidate.

    "I'm seriously considering it," Titus said, adding that she planned to make a decision by the end of the week.

    Daskas' brief statement didn't elaborate on the reasons behind his surprise exit from a contest in which the political newcomer was thought to have a good shot at victory.

    "The Daskas campaign has every confidence that another strong, viable candidate will enter the race and unseat incumbent Jon Porter," the statement said. "Daskas thanks everyone for their support and asks supporters to stay focused on the common goal of changing our representative."

    Titus, a 20-year veteran of the state Senate, was the unsuccessful Democratic nominee for governor in 2006. She said she was "flattered" by the calls to run from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, party leaders and longtime grass-roots supporters.

    She noted that she is well-known throughout the state and in the congressional district, which overlaps a substantial portion of her Senate district. Titus also has a broad base of fundraising support from the gubernatorial race.

    "And I don't think anybody works harder than I do, so if I do it, I'll do it all the way," Titus said.

    In the gubernatorial race, Titus beat Jim Gibbons by 2 percentage points in the 3rd District.

    Titus lives just outside the 3rd District but recently bought a retirement home and shares a family vacation home within the district. Federal candidates are not legally required to live within the districts they represent.

    Titus would have to give up her Senate seat to run for Congress at a time when Democrats see great opportunity to take the majority in the upper house of the Legislature. Republicans currently hold the majority by one vote.

    Titus said that would be a factor in her decision.

    "I'm going to make this decision fast," she said. "...If I'm going to do this, I have to do it gangbusters because I'd be starting late."

    Titus was one of several Democratic stars originally sought to run for the seat, but she turned it down.

    Democrats' prospects have gotten markedly better since then, with the comparative voter registration for the two parties going from nearly even to a sizable Democratic edge.

    There are now 22,559 more Democrats than Republicans in the district, according to the Clark County Election Department, an advantage of 5.8 percent of the total registered voters. The 3rd District incorporates mostly suburban areas of Clark County.

    Porter aide Matt Leffingwell said the congressman was ready to fend off any challenge.

    "Jon Porter has a record of success, a substantial fundraising advantage and a history of winning tough races," Leffingwell said. "Whoever the Democratic nominee is will start with zero dollars in the bank. Nevadans are worried about electing more Democrats when all the Pelosi Congress has achieved is higher taxes and weaker domestic security."

    Porter currently has more than $1 million on hand in his campaign account.

    Daskas had raised $453,213 through March 31, according to the Federal Election Commission. He cannot simply turn it over to another candidate, although he can ask his donors to redirect their contributions.

    Under FEC rules, Daskas also could donate the funds to charity or to national, state and local party committees. Any contributions out of the campaign fund to other candidates would be subject to state or federal limits.

    Another Democrat, accountant Andrew Martin, has been running for the nomination for several months. A spokesman, Vin Gopal, said Martin's campaign would continue despite the apparent lack of interest from the party establishment.

    "We've knocked on hundreds of doors and made thousands of phone calls and raised hundreds of thousands of dollars," Gopal said, although he acknowledged most of that money has come from Martin's personal funds. Martin has collected less than $100,000 in donations from others.

    "If Dina Titus does enter this race, that would change things drastically and we would have to take a second look at everything," Gopal said. "But Andrew will be the nominee. Mr. Daskas dropping out doesn't change anything."

    In Washington, the head of the Democratic Party's campaign arm for the House immediately began talking up Titus.

    "Dina Titus would be an excellent candidate with unparalleled experience and support from people in Nevada's 3rd congressional district," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

    Some Democratic leaders have never stopped carrying a torch for a Titus candidacy, one party official said.

    Democrats also sought to recruit Clark County Commissioner Rory Reid and former Assembly Speaker Richard Perkins, but were turned down. Daskas was later persuaded to run and quit his job prosecuting some of Clark County's highest-profile murder cases to do so.

    Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., "is of course disappointed that Robert is not going to run, but he is confident the state party will find a candidate that will run a successful campaign and win the election in November," spokesman Jon Summers said.

    Reid believed Daskas "was a good candidate. He thought he was doing a good job and was laying the foundation for a competitive campaign," Summers said.

    The National Republican Congressional Committee on Monday signaled that Gibbons' preferred line of attack on Titus, the notion that she is a tax-happy liberal, would resurface if she runs for Congress.

    "Dina Titus has a long record of raising taxes on the people of Nevada. Surely she doesn't want to drag that record out again," NRCC spokeswoman Julie Shutley said. "Also, two losses in a row would ruin her career in politics."

    University of Nevada, Reno, political scientist Eric Herzik agreed that Titus' reputation would precede her in the race.

    "There are some clear things to bring up against Dina Titus, some clear negatives," he said. "But this is as hard a race for Porter as it was before."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 16 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Gavin wrote on April 29, 2008 05:05 PM: John Porter has run against a bunch of nobodies his entire career. The one time he did run against someone well known and respected, Shelley Berkley in 2000, he was soundly defeated. This guy is one of Bushes biggest lackeys. I think Dina Titus could crush him in a head to head matchup because she would be the first candidate to challenge him for this seat with any experience, donor base, and name recognition. Add to this the fact that theres now a 22,000+ democratic voter advantage in this district, I think Dina Titus is the best chance to defeat him, especially given the late start that any democratic candidate tapped will face. Titus has the network, support and work ethic to "hit the ground running" and build a campaign that can stand up to the machine Porter has built through being a bush cronie and representative of the casinos, not the people. The proof is in the pudding, below is a list of his top four contributors in 2006. After looking at these numbers its hard to argue that Porter represents the actual everyday people of his district.

    Top Four Contributors to Jon Porter (R) During the 2006 Election Cycle

    Donor-Amount (US Dollars)

    1. MGM Mirage- $ 51,200

    2. Station Casinos- $ 40,900

    3. JA Tiberti Construction- $ 36,000

    4.Harrah's Entertainment- $ 35,225

    Source: Center for Responsive Politics
    (contributions are often given through PACs of the gaming industry or these corportations, as well as employee and ownership contributions)


    Report abuse

    Ernest wrote on April 29, 2008 02:07 PM: No doubt he was told to drop out by the dummyrats. They want someone well known to run against Porter. I'm not a fan of Porter, due to some of his votes the past two years. I would have voted for Mr. Daskas, but I will not vote for Ms. Titus. Porter will win again.


    Report abuse

    Cat wrote on April 29, 2008 01:12 PM: For whatever reason Robert decided to withdraw from the congressional race,I would believe it had nothing to do with any inability to unseat Porter! I respect Robert as a man who has displayed sincerity and integrity and also among the few that know the true meaning of trust!I also like Dina Titus Dina is knowledgeable warm and will also stand up for her constituents. Porter has played dirty politics as he often has to be reminded as to who he represents and that is the people of CD3 !When push comes to shove Porter will play the same game with Andrew Martin that he did with 3rd generation Nevadan Tessa Haven Porter will continue to act like the spoiled child that he is. May the best Democrat win


    Report abuse

    nevada wrote on April 29, 2008 12:47 PM: "There are some clear things to bring up against Dina Titus, some clear negatives," he said. "But this is as hard a race for Porter as it was before."

    Because incumbents suck........

    Vote them all out and focus on the future for the people of nevada.


    Report abuse

    Typical County Dems wrote on April 29, 2008 12:14 PM: In another article, Reid said this situation is not the fault of the Democratic party.

    I call BS!

    If anyone does just a cursory look at elections past...you would notice that there are seats that go unchallenged every cycle. The Dems in Nevada have done nothing to reach out to community leaders, activists, or just plain concerned citizens to get them to run or participate in the electoral process.

    If the party would get their act together and actually reach out to REGISTERED DEMOCRATS WHOSE CONTACT INFORMATION THEY HAVE ON HAND (other than to ask for money for their favorite candidates) then the party would have an extremely deep list of candidates to choose from.

    Instead, the Dem leaders sit back and do nothing.

    Was Daskas dropping out a surprise? Yes.

    Is it Daskas' fault that the party does not network with enough community leaders to have a deep potential candidate list? NO...THAT IS ALL THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S FAULT.

    Let's see how the party can blow another excellent chance of winning in 2008.


    Report abuse

    nvkorruption wrote on April 29, 2008 11:56 AM: RussBBinVegas@aol.com

    Actually..it isnt about republican or democrat in Nevada. Its not aboiut raising taxes.

    Its about Nevada elected officials have nothing to show for the money they get but conflicts of interests and corruption.

    The people of Nevada who pay their taxes and elect these creeps (in good faith) get screwed.

    Its time to stand up and stop the pattern and practice of corruption at the expense of Nevada families.

    It appears that the only time they appear to be serving the best interest of the people is when they are under federal investigation for corruption ...and at election time.

    Look at the numbers...across the board, there is nothing to show for what any of these officials have done.

    Why should anyone who has been in office in Nevada be elected or re-elected?

    One would have to be an idiot to want more of the same.


    Report abuse

    RussBBinVegas@aol.com wrote on April 29, 2008 11:30 AM: Why do you Republicans endlessly wail about Democrats "raising their taxes" when in fact your beloved Republican politicians SPEND just as much (on war & tax cuts for the wealthy) but BORROW it, which is just as bad if not worse than taxing. Don't you Repubs have children? Their America is going to be impoverished, thanks to BushCheney profligacy & irresponsibility & massive debt.


    Report abuse

    Summerlin Res wrote on April 29, 2008 10:53 AM: Dina please do all of us here in Nevada a big favor and not run. I have had enough of you. I don't my taxes being raised.
    Dingy Reid is all that Nevada can handle.
    But on the other hand another loss would ruin your career. So I guess it would be fun watching you lose again!!!


    Report abuse

    endrun wrote on April 29, 2008 10:47 AM: Good!!! Now we need to make sure that Bill Kephart doesnt get elected judge.
    The district attorney's office is a snake pit that needs to be cleaned up and an end put to the corruption in the judicial/justice system in Nevada.

    I could say more but its preaching to the choir.

    Dont vote for incumbents, Harry ties, or former DA's


    Report abuse

    Joe C. wrote on April 29, 2008 10:47 AM: If you people really want CHANGE, vote for someone who is nether a member of the Republican or Demecratic party. Nether party is going to repesent the people.


    Read All Comments