Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

News


Feds find glitches in Yucca documentation

Quality assurance program continues to encounter snags

WASHINGTON -- Federal auditors said in a report this week that they spotted a few more glitches in quality assurance procedures for the Yucca Mountain program.

Quality assurance requires meticulous documentation of most every activity of the nuclear waste repository effort so it can be retraced. If problems are discovered, they are run through a system of corrective actions.

Auditors working for the U.S. Department of Energy's inspector general said they identified a study that was not run through quality assurance before being included in four documents related to the repository's expected performance.

While the use of unqualified material is sometimes OK, the auditors determined it was not justified in this case.


Most Popular Stories
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas
  • NORM: Cruise the object of a twin crush
  • Durango teacher accused of sex acts with student



  • In a five-page report issued Thursday, auditors said several other previously identified procedural issues had not been fully resolved.

    Ward Sproat, head of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, told inspectors the issues will be reviewed.

    In a series of reports over the years, the DOE inspector general and the Government Accountability Office have focused on weaknesses in the Yucca quality assurance program.

    DOE managers said fixing the program has been a priority and that it largely has turned around.

    The findings in the latest report "are not huge per se, but when you look at the pattern that has been documented it is clear DOE has not instilled in its workers the need for quality controls," said Bob Loux, director of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects.

    In another citation in the latest report, auditors said five questionable safety documents were processed between December 2005 and October 2006, a period when the DOE had put a freeze on while trying to fix quality procedures.

    Auditors credited the DOE for spotting the problem first. They said there was no impact because the documents were revised after being run through the new procedures.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@ stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 0 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count: