Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

News


State seeks more time for Yucca review

WASHINGTON -- Nevada officials have requested more time to prepare challenges to the U.S. Department of Energy's license application for a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The 30-day period for filing license contentions should be extended to 180 days, attorneys argued in a motion filed this week with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The expected application will top 8,000 pages and include about 100,000 pages of supporting references and associated environmental studies. The application filing is expected next month.

The 30-day clock to challenge the application starts ticking after NRC staff decide to docket the application. That decision would be expected in the fall.


Most Popular Stories
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas
  • NORM: Cruise the object of a twin crush
  • Durango teacher accused of sex acts with student



  • "Reviewing the (license application) will be a monumental task, unlike one that any potential NRC party has ever faced," attorneys said in the motion, filed Monday. "The 30-day period is grossly inadequate."

    State officials have estimated they might prepare a record 250 to 500 challenges to the science research and engineering designs for the repository, as well as the Energy Department's program management.

    Some challenges probably will be consolidated or dismissed by NRC administrative judges before being heard, attorneys have acknowledged.

    Nevada's five-member congressional delegation added its support of the extension request in a letter sent to the NRC on Wednesday, saying more time to review and respond to the mountains of material would be "in the interest of fairness and good public policy."

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 0 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count: